Student Perceptions of the Use of Multimedia for Online Course Communication

Jaclyn Krause, Laura Portolese, Julie Bonner


A great deal of research exists in the use of multimedia communications in online classrooms as a means of furthering student engagement. However, little research exists that examines the perceptions of students when such technologies are used. Additionally, it is unclear that students are likely to engage in the use of such technologies when available. This research explores the perceptions of 69 students taking both online and hybrid undergraduate project management courses. Specifically, the study seeks to explore how students experienced the use of multimedia by their instructor and classmates in both online announcements and discussions, as well as whether these same students used or would be likely to use multimedia for similar communications. Finally, student perceptions of social presence, the degree to which one is perceived as a real person in computer-mediated communication (Gunawardena, 1995), are examined. The results of the study indicate that while students overwhelming enjoy the instructor’s use of multimedia communication, they are unlikely to engage in using these technologies themselves. A discussion of these results and recommendations for further research complete this paper.


online classes; multimedia communications; social presence

Full Text:



Abdullah, M. H. 1999. An examination of social presence cues in online conferences. Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University. Dissertation Abstracts International, 60, 11.

Allen, I. E. & Seaman, J. (2014), Online Report Card: Tracking online education in the United States. Retrieved from

Beckett, G., Amaro-Jiménez, C., and Beckett, K. (2010).

Students’ use of asynchronous discussions for academic discourse socialization, Distance Education, 31:3, 315-33. DOI:

Brilleslyper, M., Ghrist, M., Holcomb, T., Schaubroeck, B., Warner, B., & Williams, S. (2012). What's the point? the benefits of grading without points. Primus : Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, 22(5), 411-427.

Cerniglia, E. G. (2011). Modeling best practice through online learning: Building relationships. YC Young Children, 66(3), 54-56, 58-59.

Canney, C. (2015). Elements that affect student engagement in online graduate courses. New England College.

Cooper, H., & Keefe, C. (September 2001). Preparation of teachers of visually impaired students via distance. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 95(9) 563-566.

Crook, A., Mauchline, A., Maw, S., Lawson, C., Drinkwater, R., Lundqvist, K., ... & Park, J. (2012). The use of video technology for providing feedback to students: Can it enhance the feedback experience for staff and students?.Computers & Education, 58(1), 386-396.

Dias, L. P., & Trumpy, R. (2014). Online Instructor's Use of Audio Feedback to Increase Social Presence and Student Satisfaction. Journal of Educators Online, 11(2).

Dixson, M. D. (2010). Creating effective student engagement in online courses: What do students find engaging? Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(2), 1–13.

Farias, G., Farias, C. M., & Fairfield, K. D. (2010). Teacher as judge or partner: The dilemma of grades versus learning. Journal of Education for Business, 85(6), 336-342.

Goldman, Z. (2011). Balancing quality and workload in asynchronous online discussions: A win-win approach for students and instructors. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7(2), 313.

Gunawardena, C. N., & Zittle, F. J. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment. American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 8-26.

Hilton, J. T. (2013). Digital critical dialogue: A process for implementing transformative discussion practices within online courses in higher education. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(4), 602-n/a.

Jones, C. (2012). Networked learning, stepping beyond the net generation and digital natives. In: Dirckinck-Holmfeld, Lone; Hodgson, Vivien and McConnell, David eds. Exploring the Theory, Pedagogy and Practice of Networked Learning. New York: Springer, pp. 27-41.

Kelly, R. (2008, August 10). Creating Trust in Online Education - Faculty Focus. Retrieved from

Kohn, A. 1999. From degrading to de-grading. High School Magazine.

Krause, J., Tucker, J. P., & YoungGonzga, S. (2015). The role of semantics in knowledge and learning transfer in online discussion forums. British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioural Science, 10(2).

Lowes, S., Lin, P., & Wang, Y. (2007). Studying the effectiveness of the discussion forum in online professional development courses. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 6(3), 181 – 210. Retrieved from

Maats, H. and O’Brien, K. (2012). The Straight-A Conspiracy: Your Secret Guide to Ending the Stress of School. 368 Press, LLC, Los Angeles, CA.

Maddix, M. A. (2012). Generating and facilitating effective online learning through discussion. Christian Education Journal, 9(2), 372-385.

Mandernach, J. (2009). Effect of instructor-personalized multimedia in the online classroom. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(3). Retrieved from

Miller, N. B. (2013). Student access of supplemental multimedia and success in an online course. American Journal of Distance Education, 27(4), 242-252.

Muilenburg, L. and Berge, Z. L. (n. d.) A framework for designing questions for online learning. Retrieved from

Mupinga, D. M., Nora, R. T., & Yaw, D. C. (2006). The Learning Styles, Expectations, and Needs of Online Students. College Teaching, 54(1), 185-189. doi:10.3200/ctch.54.1.185-189.

Online Learning Faculty Reveal Top 5 Annoying Online Student Complaints. (n.d.). Retrieved from

Pelz, B. (2004). (My) Three principles of effective online pedagogy, Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, Volume 8, Issue 3: June 2004.

Ragan, L. (2007). Best practices in online teaching: Create a warm and inviting atmosphere to build a learning community. Retrieved from

Robins, S. (2016). Discussion Bored? Create Engaging Online Dialogue-based Learning through Principles of Social Media and Effective Instruction. Perspective Understand Great Teaching - Brigham Young University (pp. 5-8). Retrieved from

Rodriguez, M.C., Ooms, A & Montanez, M (2008, Summer) Students’ Perceptions of Online-learning Quality given Comfort, Motivation, Satisfaction, and Experience. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 7(2).

Sallnas, E.L., Rassmus-Grohn, K., & Sjostrom, C. (2000). Supporting presence in collaborative environments by haptic force feedback. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7(4), 461-476

Savery, J. (2005). BE VOCAL: Characteristics of successful online instructors. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 4(2), 141-152.

Scollings-Mantha, Brandi, (March 2008). Cultivating Social Presence in the Online Learning Classroom: A literature Review with Recommendations for Practice. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, March 2008 issue.

Sung, E. & Mayer, R (2012) Five Facets of Social Presence in Online Education, Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5)1738-1747.

Tu, C., & McIsaac, M. (2002). The relationship of social presence and interaction in online classes. American Journal of Distance Education, 16(3), 131-150. Retrieved January 23, 2007, from ERIC database.

University Teaching & Learning Center, The George Washington University. (n.d.). Building community and interaction online. Retrieved from

Williams, S. S., Jaramillo, A., & Pesko, J. C. (2015). Improving depth of thinking in online discussion boards. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 16(3), 45-66,85-86

Wilcoxon, K. (2011, October 3). Building An Online Learning Community. Retrieved from


Copyright (c) 2017 Jaclyn Krause, Laura Portolese, Julie Bonner