Understanding Faculty Use of the Learning Management System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i3.1217Keywords:
learning management system, lms, cms, ngdle, facultyAbstract
The learning management system (LMS) has become a critical tool for nearly all institutions of higher education, and a driving force in online learning. According to a 2014 report by the Educause Center for Analysis and Research, 99% of higher education institutions have an LMS in place, and the LMS is used by 85% of faculty and 83% of students. This was not always the case, however. There was a time in the not-so-distant past when using an LMS was considered highly innovative. Understanding the growth and adoption of the LMS is a stepping stone to understanding how faculty may choose to adopt other technological and pedagogical innovations. This study was conducted at a large, research-intensive public university in the Midwest, which has used the same LMS for 15 years. From a small pilot, adoption has grown to nearly universal use. This study used system logs and database queries to examine how faculty used the LMS. The results identified the features that were used most frequently and how usage had changed over time. In addition, the study compared the usage data for face-to-face and online courses to determine if there are differences in LMS use due to course modality. Based on this, it is possible to better understand the role the LMS plays in higher education and online learning, to inform development of next generation learning systems or other innovative technologies.
References
Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., Davis, A., Freeman, A., Hall Giesinger, C., and Ananthanarayanan, V. (2017). NMC horizon report: 2017 higher education edition. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium.
Anshari, M., Alas, Y., Yunus, N., Sabtu, N., Hamid, M., & Smith, M. (2016). Learning management system 2.0: Higher education. In M. M. Pinheiro & D. Simões (Eds.), Handbook of research on engaging digital natives in higher education settings (265-278). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Barron, A. E. (2003). Course management systems and online teaching. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 15(1), 128-142. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02940856
Bitzer, D., Braunfeld, P., & Lichtenberger, W. (1961). PLATO: An automated teaching device. IRE Transactions on Education, 4(4), 157-161. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.1961.4322215
Brooks, D. C. (2015). ECAR study of faculty and information technology, 2016. Research report. Louisville, CO: ECAR. Retrieved from https://library.educause.edu/resources/2015/8/2015-student-and-faculty-technology-research-studies
Brooks, D. C. (2016). ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology, 2016. Research report. Louisville, CO: ECAR. Retrieved from https://library.educause.edu/resources/2016/6/2016-students-and-technology-research-study
Brown, M. (2015). The LMS of the future: Exploring the next generation digital learning environment [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://er.educause.edu/blogs/2015/6/the-lms-of-the-future-exploring-the-next-generation-digital-learning-environment
Brown, M., Dehoney, J., & Millichap, N. (2015a). The next generation digital learning environment: A report or research. Retrieved from https://library.educause.edu/resources/2015/4/the-next-generation-digital-learning-environment-a-report-on-research
Brown, M., Dehoney, J., & Millichap, N. (2015b). What's next for the LMS? Educause Review, July/August 2015. Retrieved from http://er.educause.edu/articles/2015/6/whats-next-for-the-lms
Carmean, C., & Haefner, J. (2003). Next-generation course management systems. Educause Quarterly, 26(1), 10-13. Retrieved from https://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/eqm0311.pdf
Dahlstrom, E., Brooks, D. C., & Bischel, J. (2014). The current ecosystem of learning management systems in higher education: Student, faculty, and IT perspectives. Research report. Louisville, CO: ECAR. Retrieved from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ers1414.pdf
Dahlstrom, E., Walker, J. D., & Dziuban, C. (2013). ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology, 2013. Research report. Louisville, CO: ECAR. Retrieved from https://library.educause.edu/resources/2013/9/ecar-study-of-undergraduate-students-and-information-technology-2013
Daniels, P. (2009). Course management systems and implications for practice. International Journal of Emerging Technologies & Society, 7(2), 97-108.
Dawson, S. P., McWilliam, E., & Tan, J. (2008). Teaching smarter: How mining ICT data can inform and improve teaching and learning practice. Proceedings of Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (pp. 221-230). Melbourne, Australia: Deakin University. Retrieved from http://ro.uow.edu.au/medpapers/141/
Educause Learning Initiative. (2015). 7 things you should know about NGDLE. Retrieved from https://library.educause.edu/~/media/files/library/2015/12/eli7127-pdf.pdf
Educause Learning Initiative. (2017). Key issues in teaching and learning 2017. Retrieved from https://www.educause.edu/eli/initiatives/key-issues-in-teaching-and-learning
Ervin, C. (2012, September 11). ITS transitions to cloud printing environment [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://www.[university name removed]today.info/2012/09/11/its-transitions-to-cloud-printing-environment/
Fritz, J. L. (2016). Using analytics to encourage student responsibility for learning and identify course designs that help (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/pubnum/10118996.html
García-Peñalvo, F. J., & Forment, M. A. (2014). Learning management system: Evolving from silos to structures. Interactive Learning Environments, 22(2), 143-145. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2014.884790
Green, K. (2013) The campus computing project: 2013 [Survey Findings]. Retrieved from https://www.campuscomputing.net/content/2013/10/17/the-2013-campus-computing-survey
Harrington, C. F., Gordon, S. A., & Schibik, T. J. (2004). Course management system utilization and implications for practice: A national survey of department chairpersons. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 7(4). Retrieved from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/winter74/harrington74.htm
Harrington, T., Staffo, M., & Wright, V. H. (2006). Faculty uses of and attitudes toward a course management system in improving instruction. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 5(2), 178-190. Retrieved from http://www.ncolr.org/jiol/issues/pdf/5.2.4.pdf
Hill, P. (2017, May 15). State of higher ed LMS market for US and Canada: Spring 2017 edition [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://mfeldstein.com/state-higher-ed-lms-market-us-canada-spring-2017-edition
Janossy, J., & Hover, T. (2008). Proposed model for evaluating C/LMS usage. In K. McFerrin, R. Weber, R. Carlsen, & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2008 (pp. 2979-2986). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
Kodai, S. (2013, July). Open database and DIY analytics. Presented at the BbWorld 2013, Las Vegas, NV. Retrieved from https://www.slideshare.net/skodai/bb-w-skodai
Krishnamurthi, M., & Rhode, J. (2013). A consultations tracking database system for improving faculty development consultation services. To Improve the Academy, 32, 199-214.
Kultur, C., & Yazici, C. (2014). Adoption, diffusion, and implementation of course management systems: A faculty focus. In A. D. Benson & A. Whitworth (Eds.), Research on course management systems in higher education (21-46). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
Lang, L., & Pirani, J. A. (2014). The learning management system evolution. Research bulletin. Louisville, CO: ECAR. Retrieved from https://library.educause.edu/resources/2014/5/the-learning-management-system-evolution
Legon, R., & Garrett, R. (2017). The changing landscape of online education (CHLOE): Quality Matters and Eduventures survey of chief online officers, 2017. Retrieved from https://www.qualitymatters.org/node/1040
Lever-Duffy, J., McDonald, J. B., & Mizell, A. P. (2003). Teaching and learning with technology. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Linder, K. E., Bruenjes, L. S., & Smith, S. A. (2017). Hybrid platforms, tools, and resources. Teaching and Learning, 2017, 27-36. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20224
Liu, Y. (2005). Exploring and supporting effective faculty use. In P. McGee, C. Carmean, & A. Jafari (Eds.), Course management systems for learning: Beyond accidental pedagogy (pp. 131-145). Hershey, PA: Information Science.
Malikowski, S. R. (2008). Factors related to breadth of use in course management systems. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(2), 81-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.03.003
Malikowski, S. R. (2010). A three year analysis of CMS use in resident university courses. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 39(1), 65-86. https://doi.org/10.2190/ET.39.1.f
Mills, D. (2005). Future directions of course management systems. In P. McGee, C. Carmean, & A. Jafari (Eds.), Course management systems for learning: Beyond accidental pedagogy (pp. 307-330). Hershey, PA: Information Science.
Mkhize, P., Mtsweni, E. S., & Buthelezi, P. (2016). Diffusion of innovations approach to the evaluation of learning management system usage in an open distance learning institution. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2191
Park, Y., & Jo, I. (2016). Using log variables in a learning management system to evaluate learning activity using the lens of activity theory. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(4), 531-547. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1158236
Picciano, A. G. (2001). Distance learning: Making connections across virtual space and time. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Rhode, J., Richter, S., Gowen, P., & Krishnamurthi, M. (2015). Measuring digital professional development: Analytics for the use of web and social media. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 7(1), 19-31. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-02-2014-0023
Rouse, M. (2005). Learning management system (LMS). Retrieved from http://searchcio.techtarget.com/definition/learning-management-system
Samarawickrema, G., & Stacey, E. (2007). Adopting web-based learning and teaching: A case study in higher education. Distance Education, 28(3), 313-333. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910701611344
Vovides, Y., Sanchez-Alonso, S., Mitropoulou, V., & Nickmans, G. (2007). The use of e-learning course management systems to support learning strategies and to improve self-regulated learning. Educational Research Review, 2(1), 64-74.
Walker, D. S., Lindner, J. R., Murphrey, T. P., & Dooley, K. (2016). Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 17(2), 41-50.
Wane, P. (2014). Facing the future: Adaptability and flexibility of course management systems in the face of emerging threats. In A. D. Benson & A. Whitworth (Eds.), Research on course management systems in higher education (1-20). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
Weaver, D., Spratt, C., & Nair, C. S. (2008). Academic and student use of a learning management system: Implications for quality. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(1), 30-41. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1228
West, R. E., Waddoups, G., & Graham, C. (2007). Understanding the experiences of instructors as they adopt a course management system. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-9018-1
West, R. E., Waddoups, G., Kennedy, M. M., & Graham, C. (2007). Evaluating the impact on users from implementing a course management system. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 4(2). Retrieved from http://itdl.org/Journal/Feb_07/article01.htm
Whitmer, J. (2012). Logging on to improve achievement: Evaluating the relationship between use of the learning management system, student characteristics, and academic achievement in a hybrid large enrollment undergraduate course (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from https://johnwhitmerdotnet.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/jwhitmer_dissertation_complete_1-21-2013.pdf
Whitmer, J., Nuñez, N., Harfield, T., & Forteza, D. (2016). Patterns in Blackboard Learn tool use: Five course design archetypes. Research report. Retrieved from http://bbbb.blackboard.com/coursedesignresearch
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions
