Beyond Being There: Practices that Establish Presence, Engage Students and Influence Intellectual Curiosity in a Structured Online Learning Environment

Janice Marie Orcutt, Laurie P Dringus

Abstract


To fully understand teaching presence and its implications for the intellectual climate of an online classroom it is necessary to explore the phenomenon from the perspective of the instructors who experience it. Informed by the theoretical perspective of the Community of Inquiry (CoI) model, the actions, intentions and perceptions of instructors were investigated through a collective case study. The goal of this study was to examine the decision processes employed in establishing teaching presence in a structured online environment in order to make a contribution to the body of knowledge from a practical pedagogical perspective. Using the lived experiences of instructors enabled the exploration of the influence pedagogical choices had on the creation of an intellectual climate in the online context. Using semi-structured interviews as the main source of data, the study utilized the Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) method as an analytical tool to address concerns of rigor in the qualitative interpretation of experiential data.  Results of the collective case revealed student engagement and intellectual curiosity were influenced most greatly by an instructor’s active interest and passion for teaching, an ability to identify the relevance of course topics to the student, and the encouragement for a shared responsibility in the learning process. The findings showed that the shared goal of learning extended beyond the stated learning objectives and expected outcomes of a course and served as a foundation in the creation of authentic relationships between instructor and students. In addressing the overarching research question of how instructors establish teaching presence and inspire intellectual curiosity in a structured teaching environment, the findings of this study contribute to knowledge related to the nature of teaching presence and its role in setting an academic climate in an online classroom.

Keywords


faculty; teachers; instructors; online; approaches; effectiveness; online community; graduate; engagement; teaching; pedagogy; faculty roles; quality instruction; workflow; competencies; scholarship; facilitator; instructor experience; teaching presence;

Full Text:

PDF

References


Afolabi, R.O. (2016). Emphasizing instructor presence in digital learning environments. In S. D’Agustino (Ed.), Creating teacher immediacy in online learning environments (pp.37-54). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-9995-3.ch003

Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D.R. (2011). Understanding cognitive presence in online and blended community of inquiry: Assessing outcomes and processes of deep approaches to learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(2), 233-250. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01029.x

Anderson, T. & Dron, J. (2011). Three generations of distance education pedagogy. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 80-97.

Arbaugh, J.B. (2013). Does academic discipline moderate CoI course outcomes relationships in online MBA courses? Internet and Higher Education, 17, 16-28.

doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.10.002

Arbaugh, J.B., & Hwang, A. (2006). Does “teaching presence” exist in online MBA courses? The Internet and Higher Education, 9(1), 9-21.

Baran, E., Correia, A.P., & Thompson, A.D. (2013). Tracing successful online teaching in higher education: Voices of exemplary online teachers. Teachers College Record, 115(3), 1-41.

Bawa, P. (2016). Retention in online courses: Exploring issues and solutions – A literature review. SAGE Open, January-March 2016, 1-11. doi: 10.1177/2158244015621777

Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544-559.

Bondi, S., Daher, T., Holland, A., Smith, A.R., & Dam, S. (2016). Learning through personal connections: Cogenerative dialogues in synchronous virtual spaces. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(3), 301-312. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2016.1141288

Bowden, R. (2012). Online graduate education: developing scholars through asynchronous discussion. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 24(1), 52-64.

Brock, S. & Abel, A.L. (2012). Creating a Learning Climate for the 21st Century. Transformative Dialogues: Teaching and Learning Journal, 5(3), 1-16.

Chenail, R.J. (2012). Conducting qualitative data analysis: qualitative data analysis as a metaphoric process. The Qualitative Report, 17(1), 248-253.

Cho, M.H., & Kim, B.J. (2013). Students’ self-regulation for interaction with others in online learning environments. Internet and Higher Education, 17, 69-75.

doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc,2012.11.001

Costley, J. (2015). The effects of three types of instructor posting on critical thinking and social presence: No posting, facilitating discourse, and direct instruction. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 12(2), 26-47.

Cox-Davenport, R.A. (2010). A grounded theory approach to faculty’s perspective and patterns on online social presence. Available from ProQuest Dissertation and Theses database. (UMI No. 3412363)

Cox-Davenport, R.A. (2014). A grounded theory of faculty’s use of humanization to create online course climate. Journal of Holistic Nursing, 32(1), 16-24. doi: 10.1177/0898010113499201

Creswell, J.W. (2013). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Method Approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

Duncan, H.E., & Barnett, J. (2010). Experiencing online pedagogy: A Canadian case study. Teaching Education, 21(3), 247-262. doi: 10.1080/10476210903480340

Ekmekci, O. (2013). Being there: Establishing presence in an online learning environment. Higher Education Studies, 3(1), 29-38. doi: 10.5539/hes.v3n1p29

Friesen, N. (2009). Hermeneutic phenomenology: Experiential evidence in e-learning. In J. L.Kinchloe & S. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Re-thinking e-learning research: Foundations, methods, and practices (pp. 119-148). New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing Inc.

Garrison, D.R., & Akyol, Z. (2013). Toward the development of a metacognition construct for communities of inquiry. The Internet and Higher Education, 17, 84-89. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.11.005

Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T., & Archer.W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105. doi:10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6

Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7 -23. doi:10.1080/08923640109527071

Garrison, D.R., & Arbaugh, J.B. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. Internet and Higher Education, 10, 157-172. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.04.001

Garrison, D.R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Fung, T.S. (2010). Exploring causal relationships among teaching, cognitive, and social presence: Student perceptions of the community of inquiry framework. Internet & Higher Education, 13(1-2), 31-36. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.002

Hung, M.L., & Chou, C. (2015). Students’ perceptions of instructors’ roles in blended and online learning environments: A comparative study. Computers & Education, 81, 315-325. Doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.022

Joo, Y.J., Joung, S., & Kim, E.K. (2013). Structural relationships among e-learners’ sense of presence, usage, flow, satisfaction, and persistence. Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 310-324.

Junk, V., Deringer, N., & Junk, W. (2011). Techniques to engage the online learner. Research in Higher Education Journal, 10, 1-15.

Kaufmann, R., Sellnow, D.D., & Frisby, B.N. (2015). The development and validation of the online learning climate scale(OLCS), Communication Education, 1-15. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2015.1101778

Kidder, L. C. (2015). The Multifaceted Endeavor of Online Teaching: The Need for a New Lens. In B. Hokanson, G. Clinton, & M. W. Tracey (Eds.), The Design of the Learning Experience: Creating the Future of Educational Technology, pp. 77-91. Switzerland: Springer International. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-16504-2_6

Kyei-Blankson, L., Ntuli, E., & Donnelly, H. (2016). Establishing the importance of interaction and presence to student learning in online environments. World Journal of Educational Research, 3(1), 48-65.

Lehman, R.M., & Conceição, S.C.O. (2010). Using a design framework to create a s sense of presence. Paper presented at the 26th Annual Conference on Distance teaching & Learning, Madison, WI, retrieved from http://www.uwex.edu/disted/conference

March, L. & Lee, J.R. (2016). Teaching teachers to teach online: How to implement an evidence-based approach to training faculty. In Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2016 (pp. 714-720). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

Niess, M., & Gillow-Wiles, H. (2013). Developing asynchronous online courses: key instructional strategies in a social metacognitive constructivist learning trajectory. The Journal of Distance Education/Revue de l’Education á Distance, 27(1).

Orcutt, J. M. (2016). Teaching presence and intellectual climate in a structured online learning environment (Order No. 10159552). Available from Dissertations & Theses @ Nova Southeastern University. (1825399597). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxylocal.library.nova.edu/docview/1825399597?accountid=6579

Ravenna, G. (2012). The effects of increased workloads on online instruction. International Journal of Education, 4(4), 125-133. Doi; 10.5296/ije.v4i4.2269

Rovai, A.P. (2007). Facilitating online discussion effectively. Internet and Higher Education, 10, 77-88. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.10.001

Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences, 3rd ed. New York, NY: Teachers College, Columbia University.

Shea, P. & Bidjerano, T. (2010). Learning presence: Towards a theory of self-efficacy, self-regulation, and the development of communities of inquiry in online and blended learning environments. Computers & Education, 55, 1721-1731. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.017

Shea, P., Vickers, J., & Hayes, S. (2010). Online instructional effort measured through the lens of teaching presence in the community of inquiry framework: A re-examination of measures and approach. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 11(3), 127-154.

Smith, J.A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. London, UK: Sage Publications Limited.

Southcombe, A. Fulop, L., Carter, G. & Cavanagh, J. (2015). Building commitment: An examination of learning climate congruence and the affective commitment of academics in an Australian university. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 39(5), 733-757. doi: 10.1080/0309877X.2013.869566

Stake, R.E. (1995). The art of case study research. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.

Stake, R.E. (2006) Multiple case study analysis. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

Tsoitakis, P., & Jimoyiannis, A. (2016). Critical factors towards analyzing teachers’ presence in on-line learning communities. Internet & Higher Education, 28, 45-58. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.09.002

Willis, J.W. (2008). Qualitative research methods in education and educational technology. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, Inc.

Xin, C. (2012). A critique of the community of inquiry framework. The Journal of Distance Education, 26(1). Retrieved from http://www.jofde.ca/index.php/jde/article/viewArticle/755/1333

Yang, J.C., Quadir, B., Chen, N.S., & Miao, Q. (2016). Effects of online presence on learning performance in a blog-based online course. Internet & Higher Education, 30, 11-20. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.04.002

Yin, R.K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.) Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i3.1231