Gap Analysis: An Innovative Look at Gateway Courses and Student Retention

Authors

  • Karen Swan University of Illinois Springfield
  • William Bloemer University of Illinois Springfield
  • Scott Day University of Illinois Springfield

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i3.1233

Keywords:

gateway courses, retention, student success

Abstract

In this paper we argue that simply identifying gateway courses in which a large number of students fail or withdraw and focusing attention on them is not the best use of limited resources.  No matter what we do, there will always be courses with high D/F/W rates simply because of the nature of their content and the preparation of the students who must take them.  However, some gateway courses defy expectations and produce fewer DFWs than predicted while others produce more.  Moreover, the timing of course taking can make a difference between success or failure for particular types of students, and failing or withdrawing from a course does not always lead to stopping out.  In this paper we use examples from our work with the analyses of student records to show how one can use student type and point in their academic life to predict success in particular gateway courses.  Relating predictions to observed DFW rates can highlight courses exceeding expectations and those which fall below them, and support a more nuanced understanding where attention is needed.

Author Biography

Karen Swan, University of Illinois Springfield

Karen Swan is the Stukel Professor of Educational Research and a Research Associate in the Center for Online Learning, Research and Service (COLRS) at the University of Illinois Springfield.  For the past 20 years, she has been teaching online, and researching online learning. She received the Online Learning Consortium (OLC) award for outstanding individual achievement and the Burks Oakley II distinguished online teaching award for her work in this area.  She is also an OLC Fellow and a member of the International Adult and Continuing Education Hall of Fame.

References

Arendale, D. (2004). Pathways of persistence: A review of postsecondary peer cooperative learning programs. In I. Duranczyk, J. L. Higbee, & D. B. Lundell (Eds.), Best practices for access and retention in higher education. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Center for Research on Developmental Education and Urban Literacy, 27-40.

Arnold, A. (1999, March). Retention and persistence in postsecondary education: A summation of research studies. Texas Guaranteed Student Loan Corporation.

Baepler, P. & Murdoch, C. J. (2010). Academic analytics and data mining in higher education. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 4(2). Retrieved from: https://dx.doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2010.040217.

Barber, R., & Sharkey, M. (2012). Course correction: Using analytics to predict course success. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, 259-262. Retrieved from: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2330664

Bean, J. P., & Metzner, B. S. (1985). College student retention - defining student retention, a profile of successful institutions and students, theories of student departure. National Center for Educational Statistics. Retrieved from: http://education.stateuniversity.com/pages/1863/College-Student-Retention.html

Boston, W., Diaz, S. R., Gibson, A. M., Ice, P., Richardson, J., & Swan, K. (2009). An exploration of the relationship between indicators of the community of inquiry framework and retention in online programs. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13(3).

Cabrera, A. F. Burkum, K. R. & La Nasa, S. M. (2005). Pathways to a four-year degree: Determinants of transfer and degree completion. In Alan Seidman (Ed.). College Student Retention: A formula for success. ACE/Prager Series on Higher Education, 155-214.

Campbell, J. P., & Oblinger, D. J. (2007). Academic analytics. EDUCAUSE. Retrieved from: http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/PUB6101.pdf

Clay, M. N., Rowland, S., & Packard, A. (2008). Improving undergraduate online retention through gated advisement and redundant communication. Journal of College Student Retention, 10(1), 93-102.

DePaul University. (n.d.). Gateway courses redesigned. Retrieved from: https://offices.depaul.edu/enrollment-management-marketing/student-retention/Documents/8_GatewayCourseRedesign_2012.pdf

Education Advisory Board. (2016). Bottleneck course redesign. Retrieved from: https://www.eab.com/research-and-insights/online-course-prioritization-guide/bottleneck-course

Herzog, S. (2005). Measuring determinants of student return vs. dropout/stopout vs. transfer: A first-to-second year analysis of new freshmen. Research in Higher Education, 46(8), 883-928.

Ishitani, T. T. (2006). Studying attrition and degree completion behavior among first-generation college students in the United States. Journal of Higher Education, 77(5), 861-885.

Jia, P. (2014). Using predictive risk modelling to identify students at high risk of paper non-completion and programme non-retention at university. Doctoral dissertation. Retrieved on July 13, 2015.

Juhong, B. and Maloney, T. (2006). Ethnicity and academic success at university. New Zealand Economic Papers, 40(2), 181-213.

Koch, D. & Pistilli, M. (2015). Analytics and Gateway Courses: Understanding and Overcoming Roadblocks to College Completion. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/sites/default/server_files/files/Analytics%20and%20Gateway%20Courses%20PPt.pdf

Lewis, M. & Terry, R. (2016). Registering risk: Understanding the impact of course-taking decisions on retention. Norfolk, VA: Proceedings of the 12th Annual National Symposium on Student Retention, 364-371.

Mallette, B. L., & Cabrera, A. F. (1991). Determinants of withdrawal behavior: An exploratory study. Research in Higher Education, 32(2), 179-194.

Montmarquette, C., Mahseredjian, S., & Houle, R. (September, 2001) The determinants of university dropouts: A bivariate probability model with sample selection. Economics of Education Review 20(5): 475-484.

Moore, C. & Shulock, N. (2009, September). Degree completion: Lessons from the research literature. Sacramento, CA: Sacramento State University Institute for Higher Education Leadership & Policy.

Morris, L. V., Wu, S-S., & Finnegan, C. L. (2005). Predicting retention in online general education courses. American Journal of Distance Education, 17(1), 23-36.

Munro, B. (June 20, 1981). Dropouts from higher education: Path analysis of a national sample. American Educational Research Journal, 18, 133-141

Nogaj, A. & Kons, E. (2016). Beyond tutoring: Intrusive academic assistance to increase student success and retention. Norfolk, VA: Proceedings of the 12th Annual National Symposium on Student Retention, 55-66.

Offenstein , J., & Shulock, N. (2010, 2010). Taking the next step: The promise of intermediate measures for meeting postsecondary completion goals. Sacramento, CA: Sacramento State University Institute for Higher Education Leadership & Policy.

Rovai, A. P. (2003). In search of higher persistence rates in distance education online programs. The Internet and Higher Education, 6(1), 1-16.

Shapiro, D., Dundar, A., Yuan, X., Harrell, A., & Wakhungu, P.K. (2014, November). Completing College: A National View of Student Attainment Rates – Fall 2008 Cohort (Signature Report No. 8). Herndon, VA: National Student Clearinghouse Research Center.

Tinto, V. (1987). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Wetzel, J., O’Toole, D., & Peterson, S. (1999). Factors affecting student retention probabilities: A case study. Journal of Economics and Finance, 23(1), 45-55.

Downloads

Published

2017-09-01

Issue

Section

Invited Papers / 2017 OLC Conference Special Issue