Increasing Undergraduate Success: A Randomized Controlled Trial of U-Pace Instruction

Raymond Fleming, Laura E. Pedrick, Leah Stoiber, Sarah Kienzler, Ryan R. Fleming, Diane M. Reddy


U-Pace instruction, comprised of concept mastery and amplified assistance, has shown promise in increasing undergraduate success. To evaluate the efficacy of U-Pace instruction for students at-risk for college non-completion and students not at-risk and to determine whether concept mastery, amplified assistance, or both U-Pace components are responsible for the greater learning associated with U-Pace instruction, an experiment was conducted with four instructional conditions (U-Pace, Concept Mastery, Amplified Assistance, and Face-to-Face). At a public university, 914 undergraduates (576 at-risk) participated. U-Pace instruction produced greater learning than the comparisons. Additionally, U-Pace instruction produced greater academic success than Face-to-Face instruction. The percentage of final grades of A or B did not differ for Concept Mastery, Amplified Assistance, and U-Pace students. No interaction between instructional condition and risk status was found for final grades or learning. The efficacy of U-Pace instruction for both at-risk students and students not at-risk was supported.   




online learning, instructor support, mastery, student success, U-Pace instruction

Full Text:



ACT, Inc. (2015). National collegiate retention and persistence-to-degree rates. Retrieved from ACT website:

Adelman, C. (2004). The empirical curriculum: Changes in postsecondary course-taking, 1972-2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

Block, J. H., & Burns, R. B. (1976). Mastery learning. Review of Research in Education, 4, 3-49.

Brady, S. T., Reeves, S. L., Garcia, J., Purdie-Vaughns, V., Cook, J. E., Taborsky-Barba, S.,Tomasetti, S., Davis, E. M., & Cohen, G. L. (2016). The psychology of the affirmed learner: Spontaneous self-affirmation in the face of stress. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(3), 353-373.

Carpenter, S. K. (2012). Testing enhances the transfer of learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 279–283. doi:10.1177/0963721412452728

Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. American Association for Higher Education Bulletin, 3-7.

Clow, D. (2013). An overview of learning analytics. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(6), 683-695. doi:10.1080/13562517.2013.827653

Cox, B. E., McIntosh, K. L., Terenzini, P. T., Reason, R. D., & Quaye, B. R. (2010). Pedagogical signals of faculty approachability: Factors shaping faculty-student interaction outside of the classroom. Research in Higher Education, 51, 767-788.

Denley, T. (2016, February). Predictive analytics, choice architecture, and tailored education. Paper presented at the meeting of EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative, San Antonio, TX.

Eyre, H. L. (2007). Keller’s Personalized System of Instruction: Was it a fleeting fancy or is there a revival on the horizon. Behavior Analyst Today, 8(3), 317-324.

Fleming, R., Stoiber, L.C., Pfeiffer, H.M., Kienzler, S.E., Fleming, R.R., Pedrick, L.E., Barth, D.J., & Reddy, D.M. (2016). Using U-Pace instruction to improve the academic performance of economically disadvantaged undergraduates. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(4), 304-313. doi:10.1111/jcal.12133

Fox, E. J. (2004). Personalized System of Instruction: A flexible and effective approach to mastery learning. In D.J. Moran & R.W. Malott (EDs.), Evidence-based educational methods (pp. 201-221). San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press.

Gallien, T., & Oomen-Early, J. (2008). Personalized versus collective instructor feedback in the online classroom: Does type of feedback affect student satisfaction, academic performance and perceived connectedness with the instructor? International Journal on E-Learning, 7(3), 463-476.

Gallup, Inc. (2014). Great Jobs, Great Lives: The 2014 Gallup-Purdue Index Report. Retrieved from Gallup website:

Guskey, T. R., & Pigott, T. D. (1988). Research on group-based mastery learning: A metaanalysis. Journal of Educational Research, 81(4), 197-216.

Hagenauer, G., & Volet, S. E. (2014). Teacher-student relationship at university: An important yet under-researched field. Oxford Review of Education, 40 (3), 370-388.

Ironsmith, M., & Eppler, M. A. (2007). Mastery learning benefits low-aptitude students. Teaching of Psychology, 34(1), 28-31.

Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., Estrada, V., Freeman, A., and Hall, C. (2016). NMC Horizon Report: 2016 Higher Education Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium. Retrieved from:

Karabenick, S. A., & Knapp, J. R. (1988). Help seeking and the need for academic assistance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 406-408.

Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L., III (2008). The critical importance of retrieval for learning. Science, 319, 966-968.

Klein-Collins, R. (2013). Sharpening our focus on learning: The rise of competency-based approaches to degree completion, National Institute of Learning Outcomes Assessment Occasional Paper #20, Retrieved from Occasional%20Paper%2020.pdf

Komarraju, M., Musulink, S., & Bhattacharya, G. (2010). Role of student-faculty interaction in developing college students’ academic self-concept, motivation, and achievement. Journal of College Student Development, 51(3), 332-342.

Kreiner, D. S. (2006). A mastery-based approach to teaching statistics online. International Journal of Instructional Media, 33(1), 73-80.

Kulik, C. C., Kulik, J. A., & Bangert-Drowns, R. L. (1990). Effectiveness of mastery-learning programs: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 60(2), 269-299.

Lehman, R. M., & Conceição, S. C. O. (2014). Motivating and Retaining Online Students:Research-Based Strategies That Work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

McDaniel, M. A., Howard, D. C., & Einstein, G. O. (2009). The read–recite–review study strategy: Effective and portable. Psychological Science, 20, 516–522.

Mueller, C. M., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Praise for intelligence can undermine children’s motivation and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Personality, 75(1)¸33-52.

Noar, C. M., Benac, C. N., & Harris, M. S. (2007). Does tailoring matter? Meta-Analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psychological Bulletin, 133(4), 673-693.

Pear, J. J., & Crone-Todd, D. E. (1999). Personalized system of instruction in cyberspace. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 205-209.

Rae, A., & Samuels, P. (2011). Web-based Personalised System of Instruction: An effective approach for diverse cohorts with virtual learning environments? Computers & Education, 57, 2423-2431.

Reddy, D. M., Fleming, R., Pedrick, L. E., Jirovec, D. L., Pfeiffer, H. M., Ports, K. A., & Swain, R. A. (2013). U-Pace instruction: Improving student success by integrating content mastery and amplified assistance. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 17(1), 145-152.

Reddy, D. M., Fleming, R., Pedrick, L. E, Ports, K. A., Barnack-Tavlaris, J. L, Helion, A. M., & Swain, R. A. (2011). U-Pace: Facilitating academic success for all students. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 34(4). Retrieved from facilitatingacademic-success-all-students

Reupert, A., Maybery, D., Patrick, K., & Chittleborough, P. (2009). The importance of being human: Instructors’ personal presence in distance programs. International Journal ofTeaching and Learning in Higher Education, 21(1), 47-56.

Roediger, H. L., III, & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17, 249-255.

Sax, L. J., Bryant, A. N., & Harper, C. E. (2005). The differential effects of student-faculty interaction on college outcomes for women and men. Journal of College Student Development, 46(6), 642-657.

Snyder, T. D., de Brey, C., & Dillow, S. A. (2016). Digest of Education Statistics 2014 (NCES 2016-006). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC.

Springer, C. R,. & Pear, J. J. (2008). Performance measures in courses using computer-aided personalized system of instruction. Computers & Education, 51, 829-835. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.002

Stinard, T. A., & Dolphin, W. A. (1981). Which students benefit from self-paced mastery instruction and why. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(5), 754-763.

Svenningsen, L., & Pear, J. J. (2011). Effects of computer-aided personalized system of instruction on developing knowledge and critical thinking in blended learning courses. The Behavior Analyst Today, 12(1), 34-40.

Tinto, V. S. (1987). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Tsai, C., Shen, P., & Fan, Y. (2013). Research trends in self-regulated learning research in online learning environments: A review of studies published in selected journals from 2003 to 2012. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(5), E107-E110. doi:10.1111/bjet.12017

Willingham, D. T. (2005-06). How we learn: Ask the cognitive scientist: How praise can motivate – or stifle. American Educator, Winter 05/06, 29(4), 23-27, 48. Retrieved from

Wilson, J. H. (2008). Instructor attitudes toward students: Job satisfaction and student outcomes. College Teaching, 56(4), 225-229.

Wilson, T. D., & Linville, P. W. (1982). Improving the a cademic performance of college freshmen: Attribution therapy revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 367-376.

Wilson, T. D., & Linville, P. W. (1985). Improving the performance of college freshmen with attributional techniques. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 287-293.

Worley, W. L., & Tesdell, L. S. (2009). Instructor time and effort in online and face-to-face teaching: Lessons learned. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 52(2),138-151.

Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2014). Mindsets that promote resilience: When students believe that personal characteristics can be developed. Educational Psychologist, 47(4), 302-314.

Zimmerman, B.J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64-70.

Zumbrunn, S., McKim, C., Buhs, E., & Hawley, L. R. (2014). Support, belonging, motivation, and engagement in the college classroom: A mixed method study. Instructional Science, 42, 661-684.


Copyright (c) 2018 Raymond Fleming, Laura E. Pedrick, Leah Stoiber, Sarah Kienzler, Ryan R. Fleming, Diane M. Reddy