Small Groups in a Social Learning MOOC (slMOOC): Strategies for Fostering Learning and Knowledge Creation

Marianne Krasny, Bryce DuBois, Mechthild Adameit, Ronnie Atiogbe, Lukman Baih, Tergel Bold-erdene, Zahra Golshani, Rodrigo González-González, Ishmael Kimirei, Yamme Leung, Lo Shian-yun, Yue Yao


Social support and face-to-face learning may enhance outcomes for students who face barriers in accessing Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). In this study, we investigated how self-identified volunteer leaders guide and foster interactions among small groups of students who face technical and conceptual barriers in accessing MOOC content. Several months prior to the start of the MOOC (Environmental Education: Trans-disciplinary Approaches to Addressing Wicked Problems), we asked for volunteers among the registered students to lead groups for participants whose primary language was other than English and where limited Internet access, culture, or other barriers curtailed access to and understanding of course materials and pedagogy. Based on a survey and open-ended interviews (n=10), we found that group leaders were instrumental in overcoming barriers related to language, content, cultural ways of learning, access, and time. They also fostered cooperative learning strategies, which helped students acquire course content, and encouraged collaborative group projects leading to their groups adopting some features of online knowledge communities. We propose the term social learning MOOC (slMOOC) to capture a growing trend of incorporating collaborative learning strategies in xMOOCs.



MOOCs, small groups, social learning

Full Text:



Akyol, Z., Garrison, D. R., & Ozden, M. Y. (2009). Online and Blended Communities of Inquiry: Exploring the Developmental and Perceptional Differences. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, Vol 10, No 6 (2009), 10(6).

Anders, A. (2015). Theories and Applications of Massive Online Open Courses (MOOCs) : The Case for Hybrid Design. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 16(6), 1-13. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v16i6.2185

Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Englewood Hills, New Jersey, USA: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Bartholet, J. (2013). Free Online Courses Bring "Magic" to Rwanda. Scientific American, online.

Chen, Y.-H., & Chen, P.-J. (2015). MOOC study group: Facilitation strategies, influential factors, and student perceived gains. Computers & Education, 86, 55-70. doi:

Civic Ecology Lab. (2017). 25 Lesson Plans for Urban Environmental Educators. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Civic Ecology Lab.

Clarke, L. W., & Kinne, L. (2012). More Than Words: Investigating the Format of Asynchronous Discussions as Threaded Discussions or Blogs. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 29(1), 4-13.

Colas, J.-F., Sloep, P. B., & Garreta-Domingo, M. (2016). The Effect of Multilingual Facilitation on Active Participation in MOOCs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(4).

Collazos, C. A., Gonzalez, C. S., & Garcia, R. (2014). Computer Supported Collaborative MOOCs: CSCM. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2014 Workshop on Interaction Design in Educational Environments, Albacete, Spain.

Conole, G. (2015). MOOCs as disruptive technologies: strategies for enhancing the learner experience and quality of MOOC. Revista de Educación a Distancia, 1(39), 17 (online only).

de la Varre, C., Keane, J., & Irvin, M. J. (2011). Dual perspectives on the contribution of on-site facilitators to teaching presence in a blended learning environment. Journal of Distance Education, 25(3), 1-14.

de Waard, I., Gallagher, M. S., Zelezny-Green, R., Czerniewicz, L., Downes, S., Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Willems, J. (2014). Challenges for conceptualising EU MOOC for vulnerable learner groups. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the European MOOC Stakeholder Summit 2014.

Galison, P. (1999). Trading zone: Coordinating action and belief. In M. Biagioli (Ed.), The Science Studies Reader (pp. 137-160). New York, NY, USA: Routledge.

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2), 87-105. doi:

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2003). A Theory of Critical Inquiry in Online Distance Education. In M. G. Moore & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of Distance Education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2010). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1), 5-9. doi:

Glader, P. (2012). MOOC meetup groups point to a blended (online + community) learning model. WiredAcademic.

Godwin-Jones, R. (2014). Global reach and local practice: the promise of MOOCS. Language Learning & Technology, 18(3), 5-15.

Hou, H.-T., Wang, S.-M., Lin, P.-C., & Chang, K.-E. (2015). Exploring the learner’s knowledge construction and cognitive patterns of different asynchronous platforms: comparison of an online discussion forum and Facebook. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52(6), 610-620. doi:10.1080/14703297.2013.847381

Jeong, H., Cress, U., Moskaliuk, J., & Kimmerle, J. (2017). Joint interactions in large online knowledge communities: The A3C framework. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 12(2), 133-151. doi:10.1007/s11412-017-9256-8

Ke, F. (2010). Examining online teaching, cognitive, and social presence for adult students. Computers & Education, 55(2), 808-820. doi:

Kellogg, S., Booth, S., & Oliver, K. (2014). A Social Network Perspective on Peer Supported Learning in MOOCs for Educators. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(5), 163-289.

Kizilcec, R. F., Saltarelli, A. J., Reich, J., & Cohen, G. L. (2017). Closing global achievement gaps in MOOCs: Brief interventions address social identity threat at scale. Science, 355(6322), 251-252. doi:10.1126/science.aag2063

Koller, D. (2012). What we're learning from online education. Retrieved from

Krasny, M. E., & Dillon, J. (2013). Trading Zones in Environmental Education: Creating Transdisciplinary Dialogue. NYC, New York, USA: Peter-Lang.

Krasny, M. E., & Snyder, K. (Eds.). (2016). Civic Ecology: Stories about Love of Life, Love of Place. Ithaca, NY: Civic Ecology Lab.

Kulkarni, C., Cambre, J., Kotturi, Y., Bernstein, M. S., & Klemmer, S. R. (2015). Talkabout: Making Distance Matter with Small Groups in Massive Classes. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Laurillard, D. (2016). The educational problem that MOOCs could solve: professional development for teachers of disadvantaged students. Research in Learning Technology, 24(1), 29369. doi:10.3402/rlt.v24.29369

Li, N., Verma, H., Skevi, A., Zufferey, G., Blom, J., & Dillenbourg, P. (2014). Watching MOOCs together: investigating co-located MOOC study groups. Distance Education, 35(2), 217-233. doi:10.1080/01587919.2014.917708

Li, Y. (2016). Professional Networks and Practice Change In Environmental Education. (PhD), Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.

Li, Y., Krasny, M. E., & Russ, A. (2014). Interactive learning in an online urban environmental education course. Environmental Education Research, 22(1), 111-128. doi:

Liu, C.-J., & Yang, S. C. (2014). Using the Community of Inquiry Model to Investigate Students' Knowledge Construction in Asynchronous Online Discussions. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 51(3), 327-354. doi:10.2190/EC.51.3.d

Liyanagunawardena, T., & Adams, A. (2014). The impact and reach of MOOCs: a developing country perspective eLearningPapers special edition, 38-46.

Macià, M., & Garcia, I. (2017). Properties of teacher networks in twitter: Are they related to community-based peer production? International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 18(1), 111-140.

Macià, M., & García, I. (2016). Informal online communities and networks as a source of teacher professional development: A review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 55, 291-307. doi:

Margaryan, A., Bianco, M., & Littlejohn, A. (2015). Instructional quality of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). Computers & Education, 80, 77-83. doi:

Meinel, C., & Schweiger, S. (2016). A virtual social learning community--constitutive element of MOOCs. Education Sciences, 6(22). doi:10.3390/educsci6030022

Nkuyubwatsi, B. (2014). Cultural Translation in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). eLearning Papers, 37.

Reed, M. S., Evely, A. C., Cundill, G., Fazey, I., Glass, J., Laing, A., . . . Stringer, L. C. (2010). What is social learning? . Ecology and Society, 15(4).

Russ, A. (2015). Urban Environmental Education. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Civic Ecology Lab.

Saldaña, J. (2013). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers, Second Edition. London UK: Sage.

Salmon, G., Ross, B., Pechenkina, E., & Chase, A. (2015). The space for social media in structured online learning. Research in Learning Technology, 23(28507).

Stewart, B. (2013). Massiveness + openness = new literacies of participation? Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 228.

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. In S. Worchel & L. W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago, US: Nelson Hall.

Wals, A. E. J. (2007). Social learning towards a sustainable world: Principles, perspectives, and praxis. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers.

Wals, A. E. J., van der Hoeven, N., & Blanken, H. (2009). The acoustics of social learning: Designing learning processes that contribute to a more sustainable world. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers.

Yuan, J., & Kim, C. (2014). Guidelines for facilitating the development of learning communities in online courses. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(3), 220-232. doi:10.1111/jcal.12042

Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Reeve, R., & Messina, R. (2009). Designs for Collective Cognitive Responsibility in Knowledge-Building Communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(1), 7-44. doi:10.1080/10508400802581676