Gamify Online Courses with Tools Built into Your Learning Management System (LMS) to Enhance Self-Determined and Active Learning

Cheng-Chia (Brian) Chen

Abstract


“Gamified” active learning has been shown to increase students’ academic performance, engagement, and make more social connections than standard course settings. However, the costs to use an educational game design with efficient delivery of the game/course plan can be problematic. Our first objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of gamification by using existing techniques (e.g., simple HTML-based games) and readily available collaborative tools (e.g., Wikis) from a typical learning management system (LMS) such as Blackboard. Moreover, our second objective was to examine students’ attitudes towards gamification (e.g., usefulness). Data were collected from 2015 to 2017 (n = 80) at a Midwestern university in the United State using a mixed methods approach. For the quantitative method, online surveys were conducted in an experimental group (class with implementation of gamification) and control group (class without any gamified activities) that were randomly selected from graduate level statistics courses. For the qualitative method, the researcher conducted semi-structured interviews with subjects who addressed their interests to be interviewed during the online survey. A Welch’s independent t-test revealed a significant difference (p < 0.001) in the mean exam scores of experiment and control groups. A difference favored the classes with gamification. More than 70 % of students agreed that gamified activities were either extremely or highly useful in helping them review and/or understand fundamental concepts. In conclusion, using built-in LMS tools to design gamified learning activities may enhance students’ learning outcome/effectiveness, provide more diversified learning methods and motivation, and offer easy modifications for different learning needs.

Keywords


Gamification; game-based learning; online learning; engagement

Full Text:

PDF

References


Association of Schools & Programs of Public Health. (2018). MPH (Master of Public Health) Core Competency Model. Retrieve from https://www.aspph.org/teach-research/models/mph-competency-model/

Barata, G., Gama, S., Jorge, J., & Gonçalves, D. (2013, October). Improving participation and learning with gamification. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Gameful Design, Research, and Applications (pp. 10-17). ACM.

Barrios, M., González-Teruel, A., Cosculluela, A., Fornieles, A., & Turbany, J. (2014). Structure and performance assessment in traditional face-to-face and blended learning statistics courses. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 1259-1262.

Bozkurt, A., Akgun-Ozbek, E., Yilmazel, S., Erdogdu, E., Ucar, H., Guler, E., ... & Dincer, G. D. (2015). Trends in distance education research: A content analysis of journals 2009-2013. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(1), 330-363.

Cózar-Gutiérrez, R., & Sáez-López, J. M. (2016). Game-based learning and gamification in initial teacher training in the social sciences: an experiment with MinecraftEdu. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(1), 2.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49(3), 182.

Delacre, M., Lakens, D., & Leys, C. (2017). Why Psychologists Should by Default Use Welch’s t-test Instead of Student’s t-test. International Review of Social Psychology, 30(1).

De-Marcos, L., Garcia-Cabot, A., & Garcia-Lopez, E. (2017). Towards the Social Gamification of e-Learning: A Practical Experiment. International Journal of Engineering Education, 33(1), 66. Retrieved from https://portal.uah.es/portal/page/portal/epd2_profesores/prof23288/publicaciones/0PaperSocialGamificationv5.4_IJEE_preprint.pdf

Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011, September). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining gamification. In Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments (pp. 9-15). ACM.

Dicheva, D., Dichev, C., Agre, G., & Angelova, G. (2015). Gamification in education: a systematic mapping study. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(3), 75.

Forde, S. F., Mekler, E. D., & Opwis, K. (2015, October). Informational vs. Controlling Gamification: A Study Design. In Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (pp. 517-522). ACM.

Furdu, I., Tomozei, C., & Kose, U. (2017). Pros and cons gamification and gaming in classroom. Cornell University Library, arXiv.org. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1708/1708.09337.pdf

Jan, S. L., & Shieh, G. (2014). Sample size determinations for Welch's test in one‐way heteroscedastic ANOVA. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67(1), 72-93.

Kapp, K. (2012). The gamification of learning and instruction: Game-based methods and strategies for training and education. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.

Kappen, D. L., & Nacke, L. E. (2013, October). The kaleidoscope of effective gamification: Deconstructing gamification in business applications. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Gameful Design, Research, and Applications (pp. 119-122). ACM.

O'Donnell, Nicholas, Kappen, Dennis L., Fitz-Walter, Zachary et al. (2017, October). How multidisciplinary is gamification research? Results from a scoping review. In CHI PLAY'17 Extended Abstracts, In Proceeding of the ACM SIGCHI Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play, Parkhuis de Zwijger. Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). Retrieved from http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/120652/1/Donnel_Gamification_multidisciplinary.pdf

Rice, M. E., & Harris, G. T. (2005). Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC Area, Cohen's d, and r. Law and Human Behavior, 29(5), 615.

Rughinis, R. (2013, June). Gamification for productive interaction: Reading and working with the gamification debate in education. In Proceedings of the 8th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI) (pp. 1-5). IEEE.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68.

Seaborn, K., & Fels, D. I. (2015). Gamification in theory and action: A survey. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 74, 14-31

Shatz, I. (2015). Using gamification and gaming in order to promote risk taking in the language learning process. In Proceedings of the 13td Annual MEITAL National Conference, Haifa, Israel (pp. 227-232).

Shi, L., Cristea, A. I., Hadzidedic, S., & Dervishalidovic, N. (2014, August). Contextual gamification of social interaction–towards increasing motivation in social e-learning. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Web-Based Learning (pp. 116-122). Tallinn, Estonia.

Vaibhav, A., & Gupta, P. (2014, December). Gamification of MOOCs for increasing user engagement. In Proceedings of the MOOC, Innovation and Technology in Education (MITE), 2014 IEEE International Conference (pp. 264-267). Danvers: MA, USA.

Villagrasa, S., Fonseca, D., Redondo, E., & Duran, J. (2014). Teaching case of gamification and visual technologies for education. Journal of Cases on Information Technology (JCIT), 16(4), 38-57.

Wilson, K. A., Bedwell, W. L., Lazzara, E. H., Salas, E., Burke, C. S., Estock, J. L., ... & Conkey, C. (2009). Relationships between game attributes and learning outcomes: Review and research proposals. Simulation & Gaming, 40(2), 217-266.

Yildirim, I. (2017). The effects of gamification-based teaching practices on student achievement and students' attitudes toward lessons. The Internet and Higher Education, 33, 86-92.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i3.1466