Examining the Role of Motivation and Learning Strategies in the Success of Online vs. Face-to-Face Students

Emily Stark

Abstract


The goal of this paper is to compare the motivations and learning strategies of online and face-to-face students, utilizing the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (Pintrich et al., 1993). Prior research (Crede & Phillips, 2011) suggest that motivation variables play a larger role in predicting student success in online courses compared to the specific learning strategies that are used, but little research has directly compared online students to face-to-face students. Results of this study found that while online students reported lower levels of motivation compared to face-to-face students, motivation variables were more strongly correlated with course performance than learning strategies, particularly for online courses. The results are discussed with implications for how to build student motivation to succeed, particularly in an online format, as well as different considerations for lower-level or upper-level students.


Keywords


online learning; learning strategies; motivations

Full Text:

PDF

References


Artino, A. R., & Stephens, J. (2009). Beyond grades in online learning: Adaptive profiles of academic self-regulation among Naval Academy graduates. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20 (4), 568-601. DOI: 10.1177/1932202X0902000402.

Basila, C. (2014). Good time management and motivation level predict student academic success in college on-line courses. International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning, 4 (3), 45-52. DOI: 10.4018/ijcbpl.2014070104.

Castillo-Merino, D. & Serradell-Lopez, E. (2014). An analysis of the determinants of students’ performance in e-learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 476-484. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.06.020.

Chang, C., Liu, E. Z., Sung, H., Lin, C., Chen, N. & Cheng, S. (2014). Effects of online college student’s Internet self-efficacy on learning motivation and performance. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51 (4), 366-377. DOI: 10.1080/14703297.2013.771429.

Crede, M. & Phillips, L. A. (2011). A meta-analytic review of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 337-346.

Cho, M. & Heron, M. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning: The role of motivation, emotion, and use of learning strategies in students’ learning experiences in a self-paced online mathematics course. Distance Education, 36 (1), 80-99. DOI: 10.1080/01587919.2015.1019963.

Cho, M. & Shen, D. (2013). Self-regulation in online learning. Distance Education, 34, (3), 290-301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2013.835770.

del Valle, R. & Duffy, T. M. (2009). Online learning: Learner characteristics and their approaches to managing learning. Instructional Science, 37, 129-149. DOI: 10.1007/x11251-007-9039-0.

Eisenberger, R., Pierce, W. D., & Cameron, J. (1999). Effects of reward on intrinsic motivation: Negative, neutral, and positive. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 677– 691. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.677

Jenkins, S. J. & Downs, E. (2003). Demographic, attitude, and personality differences reported by students enrolled in online versus traditional courses. Psychological Reports, 93, 213-221.

Kerr, M. S., Rynearson, K., & Kerr, M. C. (2006). Student characteristics for online learning success. Internet and Higher Education, 9, 91-105. DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.03.002.

Kruger-Ross, M. J. & Waters, R. D. (2013). Predicting online learning success: Applying the situational theory of publics to the virtual classroom. Computers & Education, 61, 176-184. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.09.015.

Mattes, C., Nanney III, R. J., & Coussons-Read, M. (2003). The online university: Who are its students and how are they unique? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 28 (2), 89-102.

Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801-813.

Reisetter, M., Lapointe, L., & Korcuska, J. (2007). The impact of altered realities: Implications of online delivery for learners’ interactions, expectations, and learning skills. International Journal on E-Learning, 6 (1), 55-80.

Roblyer, M. D. (1999). Is choice important in distance learning? A study of student motives for taking Internet-based courses at the high school and community college levels. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32, 157-171.

Schrum, L. & Hong, Dimensions and strategies for online success: Voices from experienced educators. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6 (1), 57-67.

Seaman, J. E., Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2018). Grade Increase: Tracking Distance Education in the United States. Report of the Babson Survey Research Group.

Stark, E., Lassiter, A., & Kuemper, A. (2013). A brief examination of predictors of e-learning success for novice and expert learners. Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 5(3), 269-277.

Waschull, S. B. (2005). Predicting success in online psychology courses: Self-discipline and motivation. Teaching of Psychology, 32, 190-192. DOI: 10.1207/s15328023top3203_11.

Wang, C., Shannon, D. H., & Ross, M. E. (2013). Students’ characteristics, self-regulated learning, technology self-efficacy, and course outcomes in online learning. Distance Education, 34 (3), 302-323. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2013.835779.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i3.1556



Copyright (c) 2019 Emily Stark

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/