AN EXPLORATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INDICATORS OF THE COMMUNITY OF INQUIRY FRAMEWORK AND RETENTION IN ONLINE PROGRAMS

Wally Boston, Sebastián R. Díaz, Angela M. Gibson, Phil Ice, Jennifer Richardson, Karen Swan

Abstract


As the growth of online programs continues to rapidly accelerate, concern over retention is increasing. Models for understanding student persistence in the face-to-face environment are well established, however, the many of the variables in these constructs are not present in the online environment or they manifest in significantly different ways. With attrition rates significantly higher than in face-to-face programs, the development of models to explain online retention is considered imperative. This study moves in that direction by exploring the relationship between indicators of the Community of Inquiry Framework and student persistence. Analysis of over 28,000 student records and survey data demonstrates a significant amount of variance in re-enrollment can be accounted for by indicators of Social Presence.

Keywords


Community of Inquiry,Retention,Online Programs

Full Text:

PDF

References


Allen, I. E. and J. Seaman. Online nation: Five years of growth in online learning. Needham, MA: Sloan C, 2008. http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/survey/pdf/online_nation.pdf.

U.S. Department of Education. Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies. Washington, D.C., 2009. http://www.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf.

Bos, N. and N. S. Shami. Adapting a face-to-face role-playing simulation for online play. Educational Technology Research and Development 54(5): 493–521, 2006.

Diaz, D. and R. Cartnal. Term length as an indicator of attrition in online learning. Innovate: Journal of Online Education 5(6): 2006. http://www.innovateonline.info/index.php?view:article&id=196.

Rovai, A. P. In search of higher persistence rates in distance education online programs. The Internet and Higher Education 6(1): 1–16, 2003.

Willging, P. A. and S. D. Johnson. Factors that influence students’ decision to dropout of online courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 8(4): 2–15, 2004. http://www.sloanconsortium.org/publications/jaln/v8n4/v8n4_willging_member.asp.

Patterson, B. and C. McFadden. Attrition in online and campus degree programs. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration 12(2): 2009. http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/summer122/patterson112.html.

Thelin, J. R. A history of American higher education. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2004.

Braxton, J. M. Reworking the student departure puzzle. Ed. John Braxton. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press, 2000.

Spady, W. Dropouts from higher education: An interdisciplinary review and synthesis. Interchange 1(1): 64–85, 1970.

Astin, A. What matters in college: Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey Bass, 1993.

Tinto, V. Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research 45(1):89–125, 1975.

Tinto, V. Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition, 2nded. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1993.

Pascarella, E. College environmental influences on learning and cognitive development: A critical review and synthesis. In Higher Education: Handbook of theory and research, ed. J. Smart, 1–64. New York: Agathon, 1985.

Braxton, J. M., A. S. Hirschy and S. A. McClendon. Understanding and reducing college student departure. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report 30(3). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2004.

Garrison, D. R., T. Anderson and W. Archer. Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education 15(1): 7–23, 2001.

Arbaugh, J. B. An empirical verification of the community of inquiry framework. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 11(1): 73–85, 2007.

Garrison, D. R., and J. B. Arbaugh. Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. The Internet and Higher Education 10(3): 157–172, 2007.

Arbaugh, J. B., M. Cleveland-Innes, S. R. Diaz, D. R. Garrison, P. Ice, J. C. Richardson and K. P. Swan. Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the community of inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. Internet and Higher Education 11(3–4): 133–136, 2008.

Akyol, Z., B. Arbaugh, M. Cleveland-Innes, R. Garrison, P. Ice, J. Richardson and K. Swan. A response to the review of the Community of Inquiry Framework. Journal of Distance Education 23(2): 123–136, 2009. http://www.jofde.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/630/885.

Swan, K. and L. F. Shih. On the nature and development of social presence in online course discussions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 9(3): 115–136, 2005.

Richardson, J. C. and K. Swan. Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students’ perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 7(1): 68–88, 2003.

Picciano, A. G. Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence and performance in an online course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 6(1): 2002. http://www.aln.org/publications/jaln/v6n1/pdf/v6n1_picciano.pdf.

Shea, P. and T. Bidjerano. Community of inquiry as a theoretical framework to foster “epistemic engagement” and “cognitive presence” in online education. Computers and Education 52(3): 543–553, 2009.

Coppola, N. W., S. R. Hiltz and N. G. Rotter. Becoming a virtual professor: Pedagogical roles and asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Management Information Systems 18(4): 169–189, 2002.

Shea, P., K. Swan, C. S. Li and A. Pickett. Developing learning community in online asynchronous college courses: The role of teaching presence. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 9(4): 59–82, 2005.

Swan, K., J. C. Richardson, P. Ice, D. R. Garrison, M. Cleveland-Innes and J. B. Arbaugh. Validating a measurement tool of presence in online communities of inquiry. eMentor 24I(2): 2008. http://www.e-mentor.edu.pl/artykul_v2.php?numer=24&id=543.

Ice, P. and J. Richardson. Using the Community of Inquiry Framework survey for multi-level institutional evaluation and continuous quality improvement. http://www.sloan-c.org/node/1931.

Cohen, J., P. Cohen, S. West and L. Aiken. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences 3rd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2002.

Gunawardena, C. N. Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferences. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications 1(2/3): 147–166, 1995.

Gunawardena, C. N. and F. J. Zittle. Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment. The American Journal of Distance Education 11(3): 8–26, 1997.

Hostetter, C. and M. Busch. Measuring up online: The relationship between social presence and student learning satisfaction. Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 6(4): 1–12, 2006.

Russo, T. and S. Benson. Learning with invisible others: Perceptions of online presence and their relationship to cognitive and affective learning. Educational Technology & Society, 8(1): 54–62, 2005.

Christophel, D. The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Education 39:323–340, 1990.

Liu, S., J. Gomez and C. Yen. Community college online course retention and final grade: Predictability of social presence. Journal of Interactive Online Learning 8(2): 165–182, 2009.

Kupczynski, L., P. Ice, R. Weisenmayer and F. McCluskey. Student perceptions of the relationship between indicators of teaching presence and success in online courses. 2009.

Akyol, Z. and D. R. Garrison. The development of a community of inquiry over time in an online course: Understanding the progression and integration of social, cognitive and teaching presence. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 12(3): 3–22, 2008.

Ice. P. The impact of asynchronous audio feedback on teaching, social and cognitive presence. Paper presented at the first international conference of the Canadian Network for Innovation in Education, April 27–30, in Banff, Alberta, Canada, 2008.

Ice., P., R. Curtis, P. Phillips and J. Wells. Using asynchronous audio feedback to enhance teaching presence and student sense of community. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 11(2): 3–25, 2007.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v13i3.1657