GETTING BETTER: ALN AND STUDENT SUCCESS
Keywords:ALN, Interaction, Engagement, Student Success, Retention, Completion
In the U.S., only 38 of every 100 ninth graders enroll in college; of these 38, only 18 complete bachelors’ degrees within six years. Asynchronous learning networks (ALN)—asynchronous, highly interactive, instructor-led, resource-rich, cohort-based learning—can yield high success rates. Growing demand for online education and the expectation among higher education leaders that ALN learning outcomes will exceed face to face outcomes reflect belief in ALN’s power to engage learners. Sloan-C’s body of research confirms that ALN is especially suited for the anytime, anywhere, affordable access that is responsive to learners in a knowledge society. In fact, the original principles of ALN are the same principles that characterize ALN programs that have high student success rates. This paper includes vignettes from two and four-year ALN programs that have used these principles to achieve high success rates.
Gomory, R. E. Sheffield Lecture—Yale University, January 11, 2000, Internet learning: Is it real and what does it mean for universities? Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 5(1): June 2001. http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v5n1/v5n1_gomory.asp.
Insitute of Higher Education Policy. The Investment Payoff: A 50-State Analysis of the Public and Private Benefits of Higher Education, February 2005. http://www.ihep.org/Pubs/PDF/InvestmentPayoff2005.pdf.
McClenney, K. M. Declining by Degrees. Meet the Experts. June 2005. http://www.decliningbydegrees.org/meet-experts-1-transcript.html.
The Chronicle of Higher Education. The Chronicle of Higher Education Almanac 2005–6. http://chronicle.com/weekly/almanac/2005/nation/nation.htm.
Usher, A. and A. Cervanen. Global Higher Education Rankings: Affordability and Accessibility in Comparative Perspective, 2005. Toronto, ON: Educational Policy Institute, 2005. http://www.educationalpolicy.org/pdf/Global2005.pdf.
National Commission on the High School Senior Year. “Raising Our Sights: No High School Senior Left Behind.” Woodrow Wilson National Fellowship Foundation, National Commission on the High School Senior Year: October 2001.
Kazis, R., H. Pennington and K. Conklin. Ready for Tomorrow: Helping All Students Achieve Secondary and Post Secondary Success, A Guide for Governors. June 2003. http://www.nga.org/cda/files/0310READY.pdf. National Governor’s Report citing Anthony P. Carnevale, “Preparing for the Future,” American School Board Journal, July 2002.
Foster, A. L. Student interest in computer science plummets: Technology companies struggle to fill vacant positions. The Chronicle of Higher Education: May 27, 2005. http://chronicle.com/free/v51/i38/38a03101.htm.
Friedman, Thomas. The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-first Century. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2005.
Carey, K. A Matter of Degrees: Improving Graduation Rates in Four-Year Colleges and Universities. The Education Trust, May 2004. http://www2.edtrust.org/NR/rdonlyres/11B4283F104E-4511-B0CA-1D3023231157/0/highered.pdf.
Twigg, C. A. Using asynchronous learning in redesign: Reaching and retaining the at-risk student. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 8(1): February 2004. http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v8n1/v8n1_twigg.asp.
Gladieux, L. and L. Perna. Borrowers Who Drop Out: A Neglected Aspect of the College Student Loan Trend. National Center Report #05-2. The National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education, May 2005. http://www.highereducation.org/reports/borrowing/index.shtml.
Newman, F, L. Couturier and J. Scurry. Higher education isn’t meeting the public’s needs. Chronicle of Higher Education, October 15, 2004. http://chronicle.com/prm/weekly/v51/i08/08b00601.htm (subscription required).
Hayward, G. C., D. P. Jones, A. C. McGuiness Jr., A. Timar, and N. Shulock, N. Ensuring Access with Quality to California’s Community Colleges. National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education, May 2004. http://www.highereducation.org/reports/hewlett/Hewlett3.pdf.
National Center for Higher Education Management Systems. Conceptualizing and researching the educational pipeline. NCHEMS News 20: 6, May 2003. http://www.nchems.org/News-May%202003/NCHEMS%20News%20May%202003.pdf.
Bridgeland, J., J. DiLulio, and K. Morison. The Silent Epidemic: Perspectives on High School Dropouts. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, March 2006. http://www.gatesfoundation.org/Education/TransformingHighSchools/RelatedInfo/SilentEpidemic.htm.
Measuring Up 2004: The National Report Card on Higher Education, Sept. 15, 2004. http://measuringup.highereducation.org/default.cfm (login required).
McClenney, K. M. Quoted in Declining by Degrees. Learning Matters. June 2005. http://www.decliningbydegrees.org/meet-experts-1-transcript.html.
Peter, K. and E. F. Cataldi. The Road Less Traveled? Students Who Enroll in Multiple Institutions. National Center for Education Statistics, May 2005. http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2005/2005157.pdf.
Declining by Degrees: Higher Education at Risk. Fact sheet. Learning Matters: June 2005. http://www.decliningbydegrees.org/press/Program-Fact-Sheet.pdf.
American Council on Education. “Student Success: Understanding Graduation and Persistence Rates,” ACE Issue Brief, Washington, DC: ACE Center for Policy Analysis, 2003. http://www.acenet.edu/AM/Template.cfm?Section=CPA&Template=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm&Cont
Cunningham, A. F., J. Milam and C. Stratham. Feasibility of a Student Unit Record System within the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System. National Center for Education Statistics, March 2005. http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2005/2005160.pdf.
What We Know about Access and Success in Postsecondary Education: Informing Lumina Foundation’s Strategic Direction. http://www.luminafoundation.org/research/what_we_know/index.html.
Consortium for the Student Retention Data Exchange (CSRDE): http://tel.occe.ou.edu/csrde/.
NCHEMS. Information Center for State Higher Education Policymaking and Analysis.
The National Center for Academic Transformation. http://thencat.org/. See especially C. Twigg,
“Increasing Success for Underserved Students: Redesigning Introductory Courses,” July 2005.
National Survey of Student Engagement. http://www.iub.edu/~nsse/.
National Survey of Student Engagement in the Community College. http://www.ccsse.org/. See especially Engagement by Design. http://www.ccsse.org/publications/CCSSE_reportfinal2004.pdf.
Educational Policy Institute. National Student Retention Clearinghouse. http://www.studentretention.org.
College Results Online. http://www.collegeresults.org.
Cary, K. One Step from the Finish Line: Higher College Graduation Rates are Within Our Reach. A report by the Education Trust: January 2005. http://www2.edtrust.org/NR/rdonlyres/10D6E141-08E4-42D7-B7E5-773A281BCDB7/0/onestep_.pdf.
Carey, K. Choosing To Improve: Voices of High-Performing Colleges and Universities. A report by the Education Trust: January 2005. http://www2.edtrust.org/NR/rdonlyres/40EEF8D0-1257-48C2-8622-10AEB8988727/0/Choosing_to_improve.pdf.
Allen, I. E. and J. Seaman. Entering the Mainstream: The Quality and Extent of Online Education in the United States, 2003 and 2004. Needham, MA: Sloan-C, November 2004. http://www.sloanc.org/resources/survey.asp.
Berge, Z. L. and Y. Huang. A Model for Sustainable Student Retention: A Holistic Perspective on the Student Dropout Problem with Special Attention to e-Learning. American Center for the Study of Distance Education, DEOSNEWS 13(5): May 2004.
Frankola, K. Why online learners drop out. Workforce 80: 53–58, 2001.
O’Connor, C., E. Sceiford, G. Wang, D. Foucar-Szocki and C. Griffin. Departure, Abandonment, and Dropout of E-learning: Dilemma and Solutions. Masie Center and e-Learning Consortium, October, 2003. http://www.masie.com/researchgrants/2003/JMU_Exec_Summary.pdf.
Tello, S. F. An Analysis of the Relationship between Instructional Interaction and student persistence in Online Education. Unpublished dissertation, 2002. Available at http://www.alnresearch.org (login required).
Bartkovich, J. and M. Fetzner. Data Driven Retention Strategies for Online Students, a presentation at the Instructional Telecommunications Council (ITC) national conference in San Diego, California on February 21, 2004. Also see: Moore, K., J. Bartkovich, M. Fetzner, S. Ison. Success in Cyberspace: Student Retention in Online Courses. Journal of Applied Research in the Community College 10(2): 107–118, 2003.
Muilenburg, L. Y. and Z. L. Berge. Student barriers to online learning: A factor analytic study. Distance Education: An International Journal 26(1): 29–48, 2005. http://www.emoderators.com/barriers/stbarr_final_may05.pdf.
Carr, S. As Distance education comes of age, the challenge is keeping the students: Colleges are using online courses to raise enrollment, but retaining it is another matter. The Chronicle of Higher Education. February 11, 2000. http://chronicle.com/prm/weekly/v46/i23/23a00101.htm (subscription required).
University of Central Florida. Research Initiative for Teaching Effectiveness: Impact studies. http://pegasus.cc.ucf.edu/~rite/impactevaluation.htm#Success.
Ingle, F. K. Student retention and completion rates in a postsecondary online distance learning environment. Doctoral dissertation, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 2005.
Garland, M. Ethnography penetrates the “I didn’t have time” rationale to elucidate higher order reasons for distance education withdrawal. Research in Distance Education 5(1&2): 6–10, 1993.
Schreck, V. Successful online course retention at Marylhurst University: constructing a model for online course retention using grounded theory. Unpublished dissertation, November 18, 2003.
The National Center for Academic Transformation. Roadmap to Redesign: Five Principles of Successful Course Redesign. http://thencat.org/PlanRes/R2R_PrinCR.htm.
Twigg, C. A. Increasing Success for Underserved Students: Redesigning Introductory Courses. The National Center for Academic Transformation: July 2005. http://www.thencat.org/Monographs/IncSuccess.htm.
Sloan-C Catalog. http://www.sloan-c.org/programs/index.asp. Programs listed in the catalog are peer-reviewed for adherence to the quality framework of learning and cost effectiveness, access, and faculty and student satisfaction.
McClenney, K. M. Becoming a learning college: milestones on the journey. http://www.league.org/publication/abstracts/learning/lelabs0303.htm.
Cuseo, J. Academic advisement and student retention: Empirical connections and systemic interventions. Policy Center on the First Year of College: February 13, 2003. http://www.brevard.edu/fyc/listserv/remarks/cuseorentation.htm.
Florida Gulf Coast University (FGCU), for example, FGCU focuses on retention through its Retention Management Council, see http://www.fgcu.edu/info/retention/Index.html, seeking to involve all members of its community, publishing its retention strategies, and benchmarking its efforts internally and externally. FGCU refers learners who do not find the online courses they want to schools who are also affiliated with the Southern Regional Education Board's Electronic Campus.
Pace University. http://www.nactel.org.
Bismarck State College. http://www.epceonline.org.
Carnegie Mellon University. Open Learning Initiative. http://www.cmu.edu/oli/.
Rice University. Connexions. http://cnx.org/.
Dickeson, R. C. Collision course: Rising college costs threaten America’s future and require shared solutions. A policy brief from the Lumina Foundation: 2004. http://www.luminafoundation.org/issues/collegecost/CollisionCourse.pdf.
For examples of cost reduction, avoidance and sharing, see effective practices at http://www.sloan-c.org/effective.
Swan, K. Relationships between Interactions and Learning in Online Environments. http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/books/interactions.pdf.
Chickering, A. W. and S. C. Ehrmann. Implementing the Seven Principles: Technology as Lever. http://www.tltgroup.org/programs/seven.html. Originally appeared in print as: A. Chickering and S. C. Ehrmann, “Implementing the Seven Principles: Technology as Lever,” AAHE Bulletin: 3–6, October 1996.
Shea, P. J., A. M. Pickett and W. E. Pelz. Enhancing student satisfaction through faculty development: The importance of teaching presence. In J. Bourne and J.C. Moore (eds.), Elements of Online Education: Into the Mainstream, Volume 5 in the Sloan-C Quality Series. Needham, MA: Sloan-C, 2004.
Bransford, J., A. Brown, R. Cocking, M. Donovan and J. W. Pellegrino. How People Learn. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 2000. http://books.nap.edu/catalog/6160.html.
Anderson, T., L. Rourke, D. R. Garrison and W. Archer. Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 5(2): September 2001. http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v5n2/v5n2_anderson.asp.
Coppola, N. W., S. R. Hiltz and N. Rotter. Building trust invirtual teams. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 47(2): 95–104, June 2004.
Pferdehirt, W. Email about University of Wisconsin-Madison completion rates that exceed 99%. June 30, 2005.
Deil-Amen, R. Do Traditional Models of College Dropout Apply to Non-Traditional Students at Non-Traditional Colleges? Paper presented at the meeting of the American Sociological Association, Philadelphia, PA: August 16, 2005. Cited by David Glenn, Community-College Students' Reasons for Dropping Out Are Familiar Ones, Study Finds. The Chronicle of Higher Education: August 17, 2005. http://chronicle.com/daily/2005/08/2005081701n.htm, login required.
California State University, Chico. http://www.csuchico.edu/celt/roi.
Oregon State University. http://ecampus.oregonstate.edu/faculty/manual/course-standards.htm#9.
Laster, S. Model-driven design: Systematically building integrated blended learning experiences. In J. Bourne and J. C. Moore (eds.), Elements of Online Education: Into the Mainstream, Volume 5 in the Sloan-C Quality Series. Needham, MA: Sloan-C, 2004.
Sloan-C Quality Framework. http://www.sloan-c.org/effective.
Middlesex Community College. http://www.middlesex.mass.edu/DisclosureStatements/.
Wiley, D. Freire, the Matrix, and Scalability. Iterating towards openness: April 20, 2005. http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/155.
Beyond the Administrative Core: Creating Web-based Student Services for Online Learners http://www.wcet.info/projects/laap/index.asp.
Sloan-C Effective Practices in Access: http://sloan-c.org/effective/SortByAccess.asp.
Garrison, R., M. Cleveland-Innes, and T. Fung. Student role adjustment in online communities of inquiry: Model and instrument validation. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 8(2): 2004. http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v8n2/pdf/v8n2_garrison.pdf.
Mercy College. http://www.mercy.edu/merlin/Wizard_Webpage/.
Accountability for Better Results—A National Imperative for Higher Education. A project of the State Higher Education Executive Officers with support from the Ford Foundation. March 10, 2005. http://www.sheeo.org/account/accountability.pdf.
Scorza, J. Do online students dream of electric teachers? Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 9(2): June 2005. http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v9n2/v9n2_scorza.asp.
Schifter, C. C. Compensation Models in Distance Education. The Journal of Distance Learning Administration 7(1): Spring 2004. http://www.westga.edu/~distance/schifter31.html.
Techniques to Change Your Teaching. The Chronicle of Higher Education. June 24, 2005. http://chronicle.com/prm/weekly/v51/i42/42b00101.htm login required.
Ragan, L. R. and S. L. Terheggen. Effective Workload Management Strategies for the Online Environment. Project Dates: February 2002–December 2002. http://www.ed.psu.edu/acsde/Workload_Mangement_Strat_5.pdf.
Babson-Olin Symposium for Engineering Entrepreneurship Educators, commentary provided by John Bourne, June 26, 2005.
Sloan-C Effective Practices in Faculty Satisfaction: http://www.sloan-c.org/effective/SortByFacultySat.asp.
Aviv, R., K. Swan and P. J. Shea. Concept Network Analysis of Students’ quotes on Asynchronous Learning Networks, a work in progress, 2005.
The Beatles. “Getting Better.” Sergeant Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band, 1967.
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions