CROSSING CULTURES AND BORDERS IN INTERNATIONAL ONLINE DISTANCE HIGHER EDUCATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v13i2.1670Keywords:
Distance Education, Online Education, International Students, Higher Education, Culture, Cultural Differences, Institutional Policies, Educational Technology, Teachers’ Beliefs, Students’ ExpectationsAbstract
The growing demand for higher education worldwide, along with global expansion of telecommunication technologies, give online distance education a potential world-wide reach for institutions in many countries. Given the persistent international digital divide and the potential for the host institutions and languages to be those of wealthy, industrialized countries, international online distance higher education (IODHE) has great potential for educational and cultural imperialism. Therefore institutions contemplating expansion into international distance education must accommodate a number of changes that would enable building the safe learning/teaching environment needed for the development of a successful course. Drawing on literature of domestic and international online teaching and learning, multicultural studies, as well as personal international teaching and learning experience, the authors examine four domains where these changes are of critical importance: 1) host institution, 2) technology, 3) learning models of students, and 4) teaching models of faculty. The paper discusses issues and practices in each of these domains and offers general recommendations for institutions participating or planning to participate in cross-border/cross-culture online education.
References
Open Doors 2005: International Students in the United States. Press release, 2005. http://opendoors.iienetwork.org/?p=69736.
Marginson, S. Don’t leave me hanging on the Anglophone: The potential for online distance higher education in the Asian-Pacific Region. Higher Education Quarterly 58(2/3): 74–113, 2004.
van der Wender, M. The Role of US Higher Education in the Global E-learning Market. Research and Occasional Paper Series CSHE.1.02, Center for the Study of Higher Education, University of California, Berkeley, (Berkeley: CSHE), 2002. http://cshe.berkeley.edu/publications/docs/ROP.WendePaper1.02.pdf.
McIsaac, M. S. Online Learning from an International Perspective. Educational Media International 39(1): 17–21, 2002.
Bentley, J. P. H, M. V.Tinney &B. H. Chia. Intercultural Internet-based Learning: Know your audience and what it values. Educational Technology Research and Development 53(2): 117–127, 2005.
Lauzon, A. C. Situating cognition and crossing borders: resisting the hegemony of mediated education. British Journal of Educational Technology 30(3): 261–276, 1999.
Darrup-Boychuck, C. Harnessing the power of the Internet for international student recruitment. The Technology Source: January/February 2002. http://ts.mivu.org/default.asp?show=article&id=1034.
Sedgwick, R. Online education may impact foreign recruitment. World Education News & Reviews 12(2): March/April 1999. http://www.wes.org/ewenr/99mar/research.htm.
Harley, D., S. Lawrence, S. Ouyang & J. L. White. (Eds). University Teaching as E-business? Research and Policy Agendas. Selected Conference Proceedings, University of California, Berkeley, October 26–27, 2001.
Australia’s Competitors in International Education: July 2005 Update. Australian Educational International: July 2005. http://aei.dest.gov.au/AEI/PublicationsAndResearch/Publications/CompAnalysisJuly05_pdf.
Adam, S. Transnational Education Project Report and Recommendations. 2001. http://eees.universia.es/documentos/otros/complementarios/ transnational-education-project.pdf.
Knipe, R. Personal communication. Genesee Community College, Batavia, NY, 2007.
Sedgwick, R. Diploma mills go digital. World Education News & Reviews 13(4): 2000. http://www.wes.org/ewenr/00july/feature.htm.
Belz, J. A. Social dimensions of telecollaborative foreign language study. Language Learning & Technology 6(1): 66–81, 2002.
Liaw, M. E-learning and the development of intercultural competence. Language Learning & Technology 10(3): 49–64, 2006.
Cole, J. & B. Robertson. Using market segmentation to develop a large section, web-enhanced survey course. Innovate 2(4): 2006. http://www.innovateonline.info/index.php?view=article&id=61.
Collis, B. Designing for differences: cultural issues in the design of WWW-based course-support sites. British Journal of Educational Technology 30(3): 201–215, 1999.
Al-Jarf, R. S. Cross-cultural Communication: Saudi, Ukrainian and Russian Students Online. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED489964, 2004.
Howell, S., M. C. Harris, S. A. Wilkinson, K. Zuluaga, & P. Voutier. Teaching mixed-mode: A case study in remote delivery of computer science in Africa. International Media Educational 41(4): 297–306, 2004.
Wiesenberg, F. & E. Stacey. Reflections on teaching and learning online: Quality program design, delivery and support issues from a cross-global perspective. Distance Education 26(3): 385–404, 2005.
Labour, M., C. Juwah, N. White & S. Tolley. Online Tutoring e-Book: Culture and Ethics: Facilitating Online Learning, 2000. http://otis.scotcit.ac.uk/onlinebook/otisT6p.htm.
Branden, J. V. & J. Lambert. Cultural issues related to transnational Open and Distance Learning in universities: a European problem? British Journal of Educational Technology 30(3): 251–260, 1999.
Distance Degree Programs: Course Basics. Washington State University website. http://www.distance.wsu.edu/courses/basics.asp.
Adkins, M. Practice: Syllabus display and time on task. Sloan-C Effective Practices, 2002. http://www.sloan-c.org/node/241.
Oaks, M. Practice: Introduction to course and professor welcomes learners. Sloan-C Effective Practices, 2002. http://www.sloan-c.org/node/242.
Jiang, M. Practice: Strategies for mentoring online adult learners in a competency-based degree program. Sloan-C Effective Practices, 2002. http://www.sloan-c.org/node/248.
Cochrane, P. Practice: Proactive academic advising for distance students. Sloan-C Effective Practices, 2004. http://www.sloan-c.org/node/381.
Sax, B. Practice: Wizards: Student tutors help peers learn. Sloan-C Effective Practices, 2002 http://www.sloan-c.org/node/240.
Benke, M. Practice: Capella University’s online writing support center. Sloan-C Effective Practices, 2003. http://www.sloan-c.org/node/389.
Clerkin M. J. Practice: A comprehensive plan for preparing online students. Sloan-C Effective Practices, 2004. http://www.sloan-c.org/node/393.
DiPaolo, A. Practice: Courselets designed for custom tutorials. Sloan-C Effective Practices, 2002. http://www.sloan-c.org/node/239.
Schechner, K. Practice: Creation of focused educational planning environment meets army student needs. Sloan-C Effective Practices, 2004. http://www.sloan-c.org/node/234.
Maryland Faculty Online. http://www.mdfaconline.org/index.html.
Puzziferro, M. Practice: Supporting online adjunct faculty: A virtual mentoring program. Sloan-C Effective Practices, 2004. http://www.sloan-c.org/node/365.
Pickett, A. Practice: Faculty development process. Sloan-C Effective Practices, 2002. http://www.sloan-c.org/node/347.
McNaught, C. Development and support for the global e-teacher. Global Educator 2003. http://www.globaled.com/articles.html.
Kurt, L. Internationalization of higher education: OECD perspectives. In Harley, D., Lawrence, S., Ouyang, S., & White, J.L. (Eds). University Teaching as E-business? Research and Policy Agendas. Selected Conference Proceedings, University of California, Berkeley (October 26–27, 2001), 2002. http://cshe.berkeley.edu/publications/publications.php?id=38.
King, B. Refocusing quality: moving towards ‘extreme evaluation. In Proceedings of the 11th Cambridge International Conference on Open and Distance Learning: 96–100, 2005. http://www2.open.ac.uk/r06/conference/papers2005.pdf.
Internet World Stats: Usage and Population Statistics, 2007. http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm.
Würtz, E. A cross-cultural analysis of websites from high-context cultures and low-context cultures. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11(1): article 13, 2005. http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue1/wuertz.html.
Evers, V. Cross-cultural understanding of graphical elements on the DirectED website. In Smith, A (Ed.), Proceedings of Annual Workshop on Cultural Issues on HCI (5 December 2001), Putteridge Bury, University of Luton, 2001.
Marcus, A. & E. W. Gould. Cultural dimensions and global web user-interface design: What? So What? Now What? In Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Human Factors and the Web. Austin, Texas, 2000. http://www.amanda.com/resources/hfweb2000/AMA_CultDim.pdf.
Faiola, A., & S. A. Matei. Cultural cognitive style and web design: Beyond a behavioral inquiry into computer-mediated communication. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11(1): article 18, 2005. http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue1/faiola.html.
Pan, C.-C, M.-H. Tsai, P. –Y. Tsai, Y. Tao & R. Cornell. Technology’s impact: Symbiotic or asymbiotic impact on differing cultures? Educational Media International 40(3/4): 319–330, 2003.
Thompson, L. & H.-Y. Ku,. Chinese graduate students’ experiences and attitudes towards online learning. Educational Media International 42(1): 33–47, 2005.
Shield, P., B. Atweh & P. Singh. Utilising synchronous web-mediated communications as a booster to sense of community in a hybrid on-campus/off-campus teaching and learning environment. In ASCILITE Conference Proceedings, December 4–7, 2005, Brisbane, Australia. http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/brisbane05/blogs/proceedings/70_Shield.pdf.
Dorazio, P., C. Hickok & S. Thornton. Modeling the Global Workplace Using Emerging Technologies. Paper presented at CIT Conference, May 2007.
Warschauer, M. Comparing face-to-face and electronic discussion in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal 11(2/3): 7–26, 1996.
Ware, P. D. From Involvement to Engagement in Online Communication: Promoting Intercultural Competence in Foreign language Education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, 2003.
Kern, R., P. Ware & M. Warschauer. Crossing frontiers: New directions in online pedagogy and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 24: 243–260, 2004.
Dalsgaard, C. Social software: E-learning beyond learning management systems. European Journal of Open, Distance, and E-Learning: 2, 2006. http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2006/Christian_Dalsgaard.htm.
Vignare, K. Practice: Getting started with Customized Online Course Pages. Sloan-C Effective Practices, 2002. http://www.sloan-c.org/node/387.
Robinson, M. Practice: Distance learning online student orientation website. Sloan-C Effective Practices, 2005. http://www.sloan-c.org/node/377.
Thomson, M. Practice: Student/faculty help desk. Sloan-C Effective Practices, 2003. http://www.sloan-c.org/node/385.
Bump, J. Radical Changes in Class Discussion Using Networked Computers. Computers and the Humanities 24: 49–65, 1990.
Morse, K. Does One Size Fit All? Exploring Asynchronous Learning in a Multicultural Environment. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 7(1): 2003. http://www.sloanconsortium.org/publications/jaln/v7n1/v7n1_morse.asp.
Bohm, A., D. Davis, D. Meares & D. Pearce. Global Student Mobility 2025: Forecasts of the Global Demand for International Higher Education. Canberra, IDP Education, Australia, 2002. http://www.idp.com/16aiecpapers/program/thursday/marketing2/ Bohm_2025Media_p.pdf.
The 2005 National Online Learners Priorities Report. Noel-Levitz Inc., 2005. https://www.noellevitz.com/Papers+and+Research/Research/ResearchLibrary/2005+National+Satisfaction+Report.htm.
Patton, M. A. The importance of being flexible with assignment deadlines. Higher Education in Europe XXV(3): 2000.
Hall, E. T. Beyond Culture. New York: Doubleday, 1976.
Hall, E. & M. Hall. Understanding Cultural Differences. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press, 1990.
Hofstede, G. Cultural differences in teaching and learning. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 10: 301–320, 1986.
Hofstede, G. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind: Intercultural Cooperation and its Importance for Survival. New York: McGraw Hill, 1991.
Hofstede, G. A case for comparing apples and oranges. International Journal of Comparative Sociology 39(1): 16–31, 1998.
Biesenbach-Lucas, S. Asynchronous discussion groups in teacher training classes: Perception of native and non-native students. Journal of Asynchronous Learning 7(3): September, 2003. http://www.sloanconsortium.org/publications/jaln/v7n2/index.asp.
Lim, D. H. Cross cultural differences in online learning motivation. Educational Media International 41(2): 163–173, 2004.
Grushevitckaja, T. G., V. D. Popkov & A. P. Sadokhin. Osnovy Mezhkulturnoj Kommunikatcii: Uchebnik Dlya Vuzov. Moscow: YUNITI-DANA, 2003.
Shadbolt, D. On-line training for multilingual markets: Localization is key to successful e-learning systems in Europe. Multilingual Computing & Technology 13: 51–55, 2002.
Agar, M. Culture: Can you take it anywhere? Invited lecture presented at the Gevirtz Graduate School of Education, University of California at Santa Barbara. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 5(2): article XX, 2006. http://www.ualberta.ca/~iiqm/backissues/5_2/pdf/agar.pdf.
Samarawickrema, R. G. Determinants of student readiness for flexible learning: Some preliminary findings. Distance Education 26(1): 49–66, 2005.
Hewling, A. Culture in the online class: Using message analysis to look beyond nationality-based frames of reference. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11(1): article 16, 2005. http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue1/hewling.html.
Yeager, D. & J. Sivell. ESL Teachers’ Perceptions of the Cultural Variables that Impact on Teaching and Learning in the SL Classroom. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the Canadian Association of Applied Linguistics (Quebec City, Quebec, Canada, May 2001). ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 475738, 2001.
van Dejk, T. A. Jazyk, Poznanie, Kommunikatcija. Moscow, 1989.
Gallini, J. K. & D. Barron. Participants’ perception of web-infused environments: A survey of teaching beliefs, learning approaches, and communication. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 34(2): 139–155, 2001–2002.
Swan, K. Relationships between Interactions and Learning in Online Environments. The Sloan Consortium, 2003. http://www.sloanconsortium.org/publications/books/pdf/interactions.pdf.
Jiang, M. & E. Ting. A study of factors influencing students' perceived learning in a web-based course environment. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications 6(4): 317–338, 2000.
Becher, T. Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines. London: Open University Press, 1989.
Bauer, H. Barriers against Interdisciplinarity: Implications for studies of science, technology and society. Science, Technology and Human Values 15(1): 105–119, 1990.
Bradbeer, J. Barriers to Interdisciplinarity: Disciplinary Discourses and Student Learning. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 23(3): 381–396, 1999.
O’Quinn, L. & M. Corry. Factors that deter faculty from participating in distance education. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration 5(4): 2002. http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/winter54/quinn54.html.
Ciano, L. Special Considerations When Teaching Non-native English in an Online Environment. Paper presented at the Eighth Annual Teaching in the Community Colleges Online Conference "The Student Experience in Online and Hybrid Courses" (April 22–24, 2003). http://makahiki.kcc.hawaii.edu/tcc/2003/conference/presentations/ciano.html.
Kaplan, R. Cultural thought patterns in inter-cultural education. Language Learning 16: 1–20, 1966.
Krampetz, E. M. Writing across Cultures and Contexts: International Students in the Stanford Study of Writing. A Monograph in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts. Stanford University, 2005.
International Students Need Help Online. Interview with representatives of City University vocational school, Bellevue, Washington. Magna, October 1, 2005. http://www.magnapubs.com/issues/magnapubs_der/9_19/news/597972-1.html.
Bhabha, H. K. Location of Culture. London and New York: Routledge, 1994.
Bretag, T. Developing 'third space' interculturality using computer-mediated communication. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11(4): article 5, 2006. http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue4/bretag.html.
Hannula, M. Third space: Merry-go-round of opportunity. Kiasma Magazine 12(1): 2001. http://www.kiasma.fi/www/viewresource.php?lang=en&id=3LoHIn6PkQfTgv09.
Culturally Situated Design Tools: Teaching Math through Culture. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute website. http://www.rpi.edu/~eglash/csdt.html.
Multicultural, Cross-cultural & Intercultural Games & Activities. Wilderdom Website. http://wilderdom.com/games/MulticulturalExperientialActivities.html.
Distance Education. University of Wisconsin - Platteville. Website. http://www.uwplatt.edu/disted/degrees/textbook.html.
How It Works. University of Phoenix Online Website. http://www.uopxworld.com/howitworks.asp.
MERLOT Website. http://www.merlot.org/merlot/index.htm.
Dunning, J. Practice: Repurposeable learning objects: the TALON learning object system. Sloan-C Effective Practices, 2003. http://www.sloan-c.org/node/230.
Virtual Science Lab. The University of Virginia Website. http://www.virlab.virginia.edu/VL/home.htm.
Campbell, O. Practice: Cost-effective distributed learning with electronics labs. Sloan-C Effective Practices, 2003. http://www.sloan-c.org/node/263.
Bishop, T. Practice: Virtual biology laboratory. Sloan-C Effective Practices, 2003. http://www.sloanc.org/node/1097.
Carnevale, D. Baking Soda, Vinegar, and Measuring Cups Become Lab Materials for Online Chemistry Course. Chronicle of Higher Education November 12, 2002. http://chronicle.com/free/2002/11/2002111201t.htm.
Alm, R. Practice: Re-creating the studio-based model online for art and design education. Sloan-C Effective Practices, 2003. http://www.sloan-c.org/node/333.
Student Services. Long Beach City College Library Website. http://success.lbcc.edu/resourcesspanish.htm.
QuestionPoint; 24/7 Reference Services. http://questionpoint.org/.
Sener, J. Practice; live online interactive library services–statewide. Sloan-C Effective Practices, 2004. http://www.sloan-c.org/node/282.
Ishikawa, L. Intercultural Aspects of CMC. Lecture notes for DMST 4503 Seminar in Internet Communication. University of Denver, 2002. http://www.du.edu/~jrutenbe/4503/intercultural.htm.
Shea, P., K. Swan, E. Fredericksen, & A. Pickett. Student Satisfaction and Reported Learning in the SUNY Learning Network: Interaction and Beyond. Online Education v.3. Proceedings of the 2001 Summer Workshop on Asynchronous Learning Networks. Needham, MA: Sloan Center for Online Education, 2002.
Sener, J. Practice: Student satisfaction and reported learning: Interaction, learning community formation, and beyond. Sloan-C Effective Practices, 2002. http://www.sloan-c.org/node/397.
Hatheway, B. Practice: Tutorial instructional model. Sloan-C Effective Practices, 2002. http://www.sloan-c.org/node/223.
Thriving in Academe: The changing world of international students. NEA Advocate Online, December 2006.
Dickson, C. C. Intercultural Communication in Virtual Teams: Case Study of the Japan-America Student Conference. A Thesis Outline, 1999.
Hartman, J. A. ATFY-R: Psychometric Properties and Productive Value for Academic Performance in Online Learning. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, 2001.
Nash, R. D. Course completion rates among distance learners: Identifying possible methods to improve retention. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration 8(4): 2005.
Richards, C. N. & D. R. Ridley. Factors affecting college students’ persistence in on-line computer-managed instruction. College Student Journal 31(4): 1997.
Palloff, R. M. & K. Pratt. Collaborating Online: Learning Together in Community. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, 2005.
Elizarova, G. V. Kultura i Obuchenie Inostrannym Yazykam. St. Petersburg: KARO, 2005.
Lamontagne, M. Communities of practice in an Arabic culture: Wegner’s model and the United Arab Emirates implications for online learning. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 6(3), 1, July 2005.
McLoughlin, C. Culturally inclusive learning on the web. In K. Martin, N. Stanley and N. Davison (Eds.), Teaching in the Disciplines/Learning in Context. Proceedings of the 8th Annual Teaching: 272–277, 1999. http://lsn.curtin.edu.au/tlf/tlf1999/mcloughlin.html.
McBrien, K. Developing localization friendly e-learning. Learning Circuits May 2005. http://www.learningcircuits.org/2005/may2005/mcbrien.htm.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions
