DANCING WITH A BEAR: ONE UNIVERSITY’S EXPERIENCE WITH EVALUATING BLENDED LEARNING

Patsy Moskal

Abstract


The 2008 Sloan Blended Workshop evaluation track provided participants with ideas, methods, and resources with which to design and evaluate their courses, programs, and blended initiatives. The many questions that arose from participants at the Workshop provided the motivation to document our University’s evaluation experiences at course, program and institutional levels. This paper presents our lessons learned including successes and challenges, with developing and conducting a longitudinal impact evaluation.


Keywords


Blended Learning,Evaluation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Madden, M. Internet penetration and impact. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved July 11, 2008 from http://www.pewinternet.org, April 2006.

Horrigan, J. B. Home broadband adoption 2008: Adoption stalls for low-income Americans even as many broadband users opt for premium services that give them more speed. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved July 11, 2008 from http://www.pewinternet.org, 2008.

Allen, I. E., J. Seaman and R. Garrett. Blending In: The Extent and Promise of Blended Education in the United States. Needham, MA: Sloan-C, March 2007.

Allen, I. E. and J. Seaman. Online Nation: Five Years of Growth in Online Learning. Needham, MA: Sloan-C, October 2007.

Niemiec, M. Blended learning strategies, issues, barriers & considerations. Presentation at The Sloan-C Workshop on Blended Learning and Higher Education. University of Illinois at Chicago, 2008. http://www.uic.edu/depts/oee/blended/administrationtrack/Website/institutionalperspective2008.pdf.

Picciano, A. G. Blending with purpose. Presentation at The Sloan-C Workshop on Blended Learning and Higher Education. University of Illinois at Chicago, 2008.

Liberman, A., K. Scharoun, T. Rotaris, M. Fottler, C. Dziuban & P. Moskal. Teaching, learning, and the development of leadership skills through constructive engagement. Journal of Faculty Development 20(3): 177–186, 2005.

Hornik, S., C. Saunders, Y. Li, P. Moskal & C. Dziuban. The impact of paradigm development and course level on performance in technology-mediated learning environments. Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline 11: 35–58, 2008.

Lee, J. & C. Dziuban. Using quality assurance strategies for online programs. Educational Technology Review 10(2): 69–78, 2002.

Lorenzo, G. & J. Moore. The Sloan Consortium report to the nation: Five pillars of quality online education. Needham, MA: Sloan-C, 2002. Retrieved July 8, 2008 from http://www.sloanc.org/effective/pillarreport1.pdf.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v13i1.1678



Copyright (c) 2019 Patsy Moskal