THE SLOAN-C PILLARS AND BOUNDARY OBJECTS AS A FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING BLENDED LEARNING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v13i1.1679Keywords:
Blended Learning, Sloan-C Pillars, Boundary Object, Evaluation, Student Satisfaction, Black SwanAbstract
The authors contend that blended learning represents a boundary object; a construct that brings together constituencies from a variety of backgrounds with each of these cohorts defining the object somewhat differently. The Sloan-C Pillars (learning effectiveness, access, cost effectiveness, student satisfaction, and faculty satisfaction) provide a foundation for the evaluation of asynchronous learning networks that works equally well for the evaluation of blended learning environments. The Pillars and a simplified model of a learning system, focus on inputs, processes, and outputs, and provide the framework for a case study of blended learning design and evaluation in a 500-student section of an Introductory Psychology course. Results of a multi-method evaluation of this course indicated very high levels of both learning effectiveness and student satisfaction. The article concludes with the suggestion that blended learning may represent a black swan, a high-impact, unpredicted, and rare event that highlights the limitations of our ability to reliably predict the future in any arena, including online learning environments.
References
Simon, P. Slip slidin away. Greatest Hits, Etc. Colombia Records.
Graham, C. R. Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C.J. Bonk & C.R. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs, 3–21. San Fransisco, CA: Pfeiffer, 2006.
Picciano, A. G. Blending with purpose—The multimodal model. Presentation at Sloan-C Workshop on Blended Learning, Chicago IL, 2008.
Bowker, G. C. & S. L. Star. Sorting Things Out: Classification and its Consequences, 297. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999.
Lorenzo, G., & J. C. Moore. The Sloan Consortium report to the nation: Five pillars of quality online education. Retrieved July 8, 2008 from http://www.sloan-c.org/effective/pillarreport1.pdf, 2002.
Vignare, K. Review of literature blended learning: Using ALN to change the classroom—will it work? In A. G. Picciano & C. D. Dziuban (Eds.), Blended Learning: Research Perspectives, 37–63. Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium, 2007.
Graham, C. R. & C. Dziuban. Research and issues related to blended learning environments. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. J. G. van Merrienboer & M. P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (3rd ed.), 269–276. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, 2008.
Piccano, A. G. & C. D. Dziuban. Blended Learning: Research Perspectives. Needham, MA: Sloan-C, 2007.
Mazur, E. Peer Instruction: A User’s Manual. Boston, MA: Addison Wesley, 1996.
Laumakis, M., M. Bober, J. Frazee & J. Julius. Meeting online or face-to-face in high-enrollment, introductory courses: What’s the right blend? Poster Presentation at October 2007 Educause Conference, Seattle, WA.
IDEA: http://idea.ksu.edu/StudentRatings/index.html.
Taleb, N. N. The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable. New York, NY: Random House Press, 2007.
Johnson, S. The Ghost Map: The Story of London’s Most Terrifying Epidemic—And How it Changed Science, Cities, and the Modern World, 162. New York: NY. The Penguin Group, 2006.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions
