STUDENT ISSUES IN DISTANCE EDUCATION PROGRAMS: DO INTER-INSTITUTIONAL PROGRAMS OFFER STUDENTS MORE CONFUSION OR MORE OPPORTUNITIES?

Susan Fey, Mary Emery, Cornelia Flora

Abstract


The Community Development Master's Program is an inter-institutional, trans-disciplinary degree program that began in 2005 online at five participating universities in the North Central region. This article discusses outcomes of interviews with current and past students in the program to determine if a multi-institutional program, versus a program run by one university, makes for more or different struggles and/or opportunities for the online learner. Sloan-C's five pillars for online learning are used to frame the findings. Through qualitative data collection and analysis, researchers in this study worked to find out if having more institutions involved in a distance education program caused students to leave the program, or if it measured up similarly to online programs offered by one university, in terms of student challenges.


Keywords


Inter-institutional,Five Pillars,Retention,Student Success,Drop outs

Full Text:

PDF

References


Valenta, A., D. Therriault, M. Dieter, and R. Mrtek. Identifying student attitudes and learning styles in distance education. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 5(2): 111–127, 2001. Online: http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/index.asp.

Smart, K. L. and J. J. Cappel. Students’ perceptions of online learning: A comparative study. Journal of Information Technology Education 5: 201–219, 2006.

Wilde, M. L. and A. Epperson. A survey of alumni of LIS distance education programs: Experiences and implications. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 32(3): 238–250, 2006.

Moore, J. C. The Sloan Consortium Quality Framework and the Five Pillars. Needham, MA: The Sloan Consortium, 2005. Online: http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/books/qualityframework.pdf.

Michael, S. O. and L. Balraj. Higher education institutional collaborations: An analysis of joint degree programs. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 25(2): 131–145, 2003.

Moxley, V. Inter-Institutional Distance Education Alliances: When, Why, Who, and How. Presentation for the 21st Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning, Madison, Wisconsin, 2005.

Lapping, K, D. Marsh, J. Rosenbaum, E. Swedberg, J. Sternin, M. Sternin, and D. Schroeder. The positive deviance approach: Challenges and opportunities for the future. Food and Nutrition Bulletin 23(4): 128–135, The United Nations University, 2002. Online: http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:g2EwYvyv2YMJ:www.positivedeviance.org/p.

Magruder, J. and B. Rohr. Appreciative Inquiry: Change at the Speed of Imagination. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2001.

Piercy, K. and T. Lee. Graduate distance education in family relations: A case study, Family Relations 55(1): 67–79, 2006.

Nash, R. D. Course completion rates among distance learners: identifying possible methods to improve retention. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration VIII (IV): 2005. Online: http://www.westga.edu/%7Edistance/ojdla/winter84/nash84.htm.

Garland, M. Ethnography penetrates the “I didn’t have time” rationale to elucidate higher order reasons for distance education withdrawal. Research in Distance Education 5(1–2): 6–10, 1993.

Bee, R. H. Differing attitudes of economics students about web-based instruction. College Student Journal 32(2): 258–269, 1998.

Lao, T. and C. Gonzales. Understanding online learning through a qualitative description of professors and students’ experiences. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 13(3): 459–474, 2005.

Flora, C. B. Information technology critical as rural and remote areas transition to the new economy. Rural Development News 28(2): 1–2, 2006. Online: http://www.ncrcrd.iastate.edu/newsletter/Vol28No2-2006/neweconomy.htm.

Pierrakeas, C., M. Xenos, C. Panagiotakopoulos and D. Vergidis. A comparative study of droupout rates and causes for two different distance education courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 5(2): 2004. Online: http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/183/265.

Williams, P. and D. Nichols. E-learning: what the literature tells us about distance education. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives 57(2): 109–122, 2004.

Powell, R., C. Conway, and L. Ross. Effects of Predisposing Characteristics on Student Success. Journal of Distance Education 5(1): 5–19, 1990. Online: http://www.jofde.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/368/259.

Atack, L. Becoming a web-based learner: registered nurses’ experiences. Issues and Innovations in Nursing Education 44(3): 289–297, 2003.

Swan, K., J. Shen, and S. Roxanne Hiltz. Assessment and Collaboration in Online Learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 10(1): 2006.

Garrison, D. R. “Online Collaboration Principles.” Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 10(1): 2006.

Haythornthwaite, C. “Facilitating Collaboration in Online Learning.” Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 10(1): 2006.

Fung, Y.Y.H. Collaborative online learning: interaction patterns and limiting factors. Open Learning 19(2): 135–149, 2004.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v12i3-4.1685



Copyright (c) 2019 Susan Fey, Mary Emery, Cornelia Flora