INTERACTION IN ASYNCHRONOUS WEB- BASED LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS: STRATEGIES SUPPORTED BY EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v12i3-4.1691Keywords:
Asynchronous Online Interaction, Meaningful Interaction, Guiding Strategies, Web-Based Learning EnvironmentAbstract
Because of the perceived advantages and the promotion of Web-based learning environments (WBLEs) by commercial interests as well as educational technologists, knowing how to develop and implement WBLEs will probably not be a choice, but a necessity for most educators and trainers in the future. However, many instructors still don’t understand the most effective strategies for designing and implementing effective WBLEs even though numerous studies have demonstrated that the success or failure of online learning depends largely on the quality of interaction within those learning environments. Indeed, it has been said learning is impossible without meaningful cognitive interaction. However, this kind of interaction does not occur by itself. The primary goal of this paper is to explore the importance and characteristics of meaningful interaction in online learning, especially in asynchronous contexts. A secondary goal of this paper is to present several pragmatic strategies for improving meaningful interactions in WBLEs on the basis of a review of relevant research literature.
References
Maeroff, G. I. A Classroom of One: How Online Learning is Changing Our Schools and Colleges. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.
Bonk, C. J. & C. R. Graham. Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs. San Francisco: Pfeiffer Publishing, 2006.
Aldrich, C. Learning by Doing: A Comprehensive Guide to Simulations, Computer Games, and Pedagogy in E-learning and Other Educational Experiences. San Francisco: Pfeiffer Publishing, 2006.
Schank, R. C. Designing World-class E-learning. How IBM, GE, Harvard Business School, and Columbia University are Succeeding at E-learning. New York: McGraw Hill, 2002.
Collis, B. The internet as an educational innovation: Lessons from experience with computer implementation. Educational Technology 36(6): 21–30, 1996.
Gallini, J. K. & D. Barron. Participants' perceptions of web-infused environments: A survey of teaching beliefs, learning approaches, and communication. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 34(2): 139–156, 2002.
Tallent-Runnels, M. K., J. A. Thomas, W. Y. Lan, S. Cooper, T. C. Ahern, S. M. Shaw, & X. Liu. Teaching courses online: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research 76(1): 93–135, 2006.
Hawkes, M. & T. Dennis. Supporting and assessing online interactions in higher education, Educational Technology 43(4): 52–56, 2003.
Johnson, S. D. & S. R. Aragon. An instructional strategy framework for online learning environments. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education 100: 31–43, 2003.
Reeves, T. C. Storm clouds on the digital education horizon. Journal of Computing in Higher Education 15(1): 3–26, 2003.
Davies, J. & M. Graff. Performance in e-learning: Online participation and school grades. British Journal of Educational Technology 36(4): 657–663, 2005.
Kearsley, G. Online Education: Learning and Teaching in Cyberspace. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 2000.
Merriam, S. B. & R. S. Caffarella. Learning in Adulthood: A Comprehensive Guide. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1999.
Milheim, W. D. Interactivity and computer-based instruction. Journal of Educational Technology Systems 24(3): 225–233, 1996.
Trentin, G. The quality-interactivity relationship in distance education. Educational Technology 40(1): 17–27, 2000.
Beldarrain, Y. Distance education trends: Integrating new technologies to foster student interaction and collaboration. Distance Education 27(2): 139–153, 2006.
Herrington, J. & R. Oliver. An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development 48(3): 23–48, 2000.
Herrington, J., T. C. Reeves & R. Oliver. Authentic tasks online: A synergy among learner, task, and technology. Distance Education 27(2): 233–247, 2006.
Weimer, M. Learner-centered Teaching: Five Key Changes to Practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2002.
Wagner, E. D. In support of a functional definition of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education 8(2): 6–26, 1994.
Moore, M. G. Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education 3(2): 1–6, 1989.
Northrup, P. A framework for designing interactivity into web-bases instruction. Educational Technology 41(2): 31–39, 2001.
Hirumi, A. A framework for analyzing, designing, and sequencing planned elearning interaction. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education 3(2): 141–160, 2002.
Woo, Y. & T. C. Reeves. Meaningful interaction in web-based learning: A social constructivist interpretation. The Internet and Higher Education 10(1): 15–25, 2007.
Gergen, K. J. An Invitation to Social Construction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1999.
Driscoll, M. P. Psychology of Learning for Instruction 2ed. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon, 2000.
Vrasidas, C. & M. S. McIsaac. Factors influencing interaction in an online course. American Journal of Distance Education 13(3): 22–36, 1999.
Lave, J. & E. Wenger. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
Gunawardena, C. N. Social Presence Theory and Implications for Interaction and Collaborative Learning in Computer Conferences. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications 1(2/3): 147–166, 1995.
Lapadat, J. C. Written interaction: A key component in online learning. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 7(4): 2002.
Duffy, T. M., B. Dueber & C. L. Hawley. Critical thinking in a distributed environment: A pedagogical base for the design of conferencing systems. In C. J. Bonk and K. S. King (Eds.), Electronic Collaborators: Learner-centered Technologies for Literacy, Apprenticeship, and Discourse, 51–78. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1998.
Harasim, L., S. R. Hiltz, L. Teles & M. Turoff. Learning Networks. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1995.
Hill, J. R. DL environments via the World Wide Web. In B. H. Khan (Ed.), Web-Based Instruction, 2nd ed, 75–80. Englewood Cliffs: Educational Technology Publications Inc., 1997.
Wilson, G. & E. Stacey. Online interaction impacts on learning: Teaching the teachers to teach online. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 20(1): 33–48, 2004.
Lapadat, J. C. Teaching online: Breaking new ground in collaborative thinking. Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information & Technology, 2000.
Kanuka, H. & T. Anderson. Online social interchange, discord, and knowledge construction. Journal of Distance Education 13(1): 57–74, 1998.
Winiecki, D. J. Instructional discussions in online education: Practical and research-oriented perspectives,. In M. Moore and R. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of Distance Education, 193–215. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2003.
Kirby, E. Building interaction in online and distance education course. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, San Antonio, TX, 1999.
Hara, N. & R. Kling. Students’ frustrations with a web-based distance education course. First Monday 4(12): 1999. http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/710/620.
Williams, C. Learning on-line: A review of recent literature in a rapidly expanding field. Journal of Further and Higher Education 26(3): 263–272, 2002.
Hammond, M. Communication within online forums: The opportunities, the constraints and the value of a communicative approach. Computers & Education 35(4): 251–262, 2000.
Beaudoin, M. Learning or lurking? Tracking the "invisible" online student. The Internet and Higher Education 5(2): 147–155, 2002.
Pena-Shaff, J., W. Martin & G. Gay. An epistemological framework for analyzing student interactions in computer-mediated communication environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 12(1): 41–68, 2001.
Kirschner, P. A., J. W. Strijbos, K. Kreijns, & P. J. Beers. Designing electronic collaborative learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development 52(3): 47–66, 2004.
Jeong, A. C. The sequential analysis of group interaction and critical thinking in online threaded discussions. American Journal of Distance Education 17(1): 25–43, 2003.
Kollock, P. Design principles for online communities. PC Update 15: 58–60, 1998. http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/soc/faculty/kollock/papers/design.htm.
Vygotsky, L. S. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Mental Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.
Berge, Z. L. Active, interactive, and reflective eLearning. Quarterly Review of Distance Education 3(2): 181–90, 2002.
Levitch, S. & W. D. Milheim. Transitioning instructor skills to the virtual classroom. Educational Technology 43(2): 42–46, 2003.
Tu, C. H. & M. Corry. Building active online interaction via a collaborative learning community. Computers in the Schools 20(3): 51–59, 2003.
Bannan-Ritland, B., W. Bragg III, & M. Collins. Web-based conferencing: Linking theory, educational constructs, and instructional strategies. In P. Robinson and B. Bannan-Ritland (Eds.), Web-based Computer Conferencing. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing, In Press. http://www.virtual.gmu.edu/EDIT611/BannanWBC.pdf.
Hackman, M. Z. & K. B. Walker. Instructional communication in the televised classroom: The effects of system design and teacher immediacy on student learning and satisfaction. Communication Education 39: 196–206, 1990.
Eastmond, D. V. Effective facilitation of computer conferencing. Continuing Higher Education Review 56 (1/2): 23–34, 1992.
Collis, B. & J. Moonen. The contributing student: A pedagogy for flexible learning. In C. Maddus, J. Ewing-Taylor, and D. LaMont Johnson (Eds.), Distance Education: Issues and Concerns, 207–220. Binghamton, NY: The Haworth Press, 2002.
Jones, B. F., G. Valdez, J. Nowakowski, & C. Rasmussen. Designing learning and technology for educational reform. Oak Brook, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory, 1994.
Muirhead, B. Promoting online interaction in today's colleges and universities. USDLA Journal 16(6): 2002.
Levin, J. & M. Waugh. Teaching teleapprenticeships: Electronic network-based educational frameworks for improving teacher education. Interactive Learning Environments Journal 6(1/2): 39–58, 1998.
Lourdusamy, A., M. S. Khine, & M. Sipusic. Collaborative learning tool for presenting authentic case studies and its impact on student participation. Journal of Educational Technology Systems 31(4): 381–392, 2002.
McIsaac, M. S., J. M. Blocher, V. Mahes & C. Vrasidas. Student and teacher perceptions of interaction in online computer-mediated communication. Educational Media International 36(2): 121–131, 1999.
Northrup, P. Online learners' preferences for interaction. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education 3(2): 219–226, 2002.
Rossman, M. H. Successful online teaching using asynchronous learner discussion forums. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 3(2): 91–97, 1999.
Rovai, A. P. Building classroom community at a distance: A case study. Education Technology Research and Development 49(4): 33–48, 2001.
Bonk, C. J. My hat's on to the online instructor. e-education Advisor: Education Edition 1(1): 10–13, 2000.
Collison, G., B. Elbaum, S. Haavind & R. Tinker. Facilitating Online Learning: Effective Strategies for Moderators. Madison, WI: Atwood Publishing, 2000.
Gunawardena, C. N. & F. J. Zittle. Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment. The American Journal of Distance Education 11(3): 8–26, 1997.
Liu, Y., D. Ginther & P. Zelhart. How do frequency and duration of messaging affect impression development in computer-mediated communication? Journal of Universal Computer Science 7(10): 893–913, 2001. http://www.jucs.org/jucs_7_10.
Berling, J. A. Student-centered collaborative learning as a liberating model of learning and teaching. Journal of Women and Religion 17: 43–54, 1999.
Williams, B. The Internet for teachers. Foster City, CA: IDG Books, 1995.
Stacey, E. Collaborative learning in an online environment. Journal of Distance Education 14(2): 14–33, 1999.
Educational Technology Development Group. The University of Washington, Planning considerations, 2002.
Conrad, R. M. & J. A. Donaldson. Engaging the Online Learner: Activities and Resources for Creative Instruction. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2004.
Salmon, G. E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online. London: Kogan Page, 2000.
Sims, R. Promises of interactivity: Aligning learner perceptions and expectations with strategies for flexible and online learning. Distance Education 24(1): 85–103, 2003.
Allan, M. A peek into the life of online learning discussion forums: Implications for Web-based distance learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 5(2): July 28, 2004.
http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/188/543.
Prestera, G. E. & L. A. Moller. Goals, structure, and feedback are key to institutional distance education success. Distance Education Report 6(8): 8, 2002.
Maor, D. The teacher's role in developing interaction and reflection in an online learning community. Educational Media International 40(1/2): 127–37, 2003.
Brown, J. S., A. Collins, & P. Duguid. Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher 18(1): 32–42, 1989.
Collins, A., J. S. Brown & S. Newman. Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, Learning and Instruction: Essays in Honor of Robert Glaser. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1989.
Herrington, J., T. C. Reeves, R. Oliver & Y. Woo. Designing authentic activities in web-based courses Journal of Computing in Higher Education 16(1): 3–29, 2004.
Lebow, D. Been worth constructivist for instructional systems design: Five principles toward has new mindset. Educational Technology Research and Development 41(3): 4–16, 1993.
Newmann, F. & G. Wehlage. Five standards of authentic instruction. Educational Leadership 55(2): 72–75, 1993.
Perreault, H. R. Authentic activities for business education. Delta Pi Epsilon Journal 41(1): 35–41, 1999.
Hillman, D. C. A new method for analyzing patterns of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education 13(2): 37–47, 1999.
Reeves, T. C. Design research from the technology perspective. In J. V. Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational Design Research. London: Routledge, 2006.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions
