IF HIGHER EDUCATION IS A RIGHT, AND DISTANCE EDUCATION IS THE ANSWER, THEN WHO WILL PAY?

Katrina A. Meyer

Abstract


If higher education is a right, and distance education is the avenue for making higher education universally available, then who shall pay? This article asks (1) can state governments in the United States afford to fund this initiative and (2) can public higher education institutions in the U.S. fund this effort through capitalizing on cost-efficiencies of online learning? To answer the first question, data on funding of higher education by states are reviewed and a negative conclusion reached. To answer the second question, research on methods for achieving cost-efficiencies through online learning is reviewed and a cautious positive conclusion is reached, assuming states and institutions are willing to invest in the people and processes, and the time, effort, and will that make achieving efficiencies possible.

Keywords


Enrollment Growth,Funding,Cost-Efficiencies,U.S. Public Higher Education

Full Text:

PDF

References


Hebel, S. and J. Selingo. For public colleges, a decade of generous state budgets is over. The Chronicle of Higher Education 47(32): A10, April 20, 2001.

Potter, W. State lawmakers again cut higher-education spending. The Chronicle of Higher Education 49(48): A22, August 8, 2003.

Walters, A. K. Long-term forecast for state spending on higher education is gloomy, report says. The Chronicle of Higher Education 52(27): A21, March 10, 2006.

Breneman, D. W. For colleges, this is not just another recession. The Chronicle of Higher Education: B7, June 14, 2002. http://chronicle.com/prm/weekly/v48/i40/40b00701.htm.

Sepp, P. Rising property taxes fuel taxpayer revolts. http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=17540.

Meehan, T. A welcome break for homeowners. http://www.terrymeehan.com/pdf/State_by_State_Property_Tax_Directory.pdf.

Fischer, K. State spending on colleges bounce back. The Chronicle of Higher Education 52(19): A1, January 13, 2006.

Walters, A. K. States are flush with cash, but colleges face competition for the money. The Chronicle of Higher Education 52(42): A23, June 23, 2006.

Rossi, P. H., J. D. Wright & S. R. Wright. The theory and practice of applied social research. Evaluation Quarterly 2(2): 171–91, 1978.

Majchrzak, A. Methods for Policy Research. New York: Sage Publications, 1984.

Center for the Study of Education Policy. An Annual Compilation of Data on State Tax Appropriations for the General Operation of Higher Education. Normal, IL: Illinois State University.http://www.grapevine.ilstu.edu/.

National Association of State Budget Officers. Fiscal Survey of the States for 2006. Washington, D.C.: National Governors Association and National Association of State Budget Officers, 2006. http://www.nasbo.org/Publications/PDFs/Fall%202006%20Fiscal%20Survey%20of%20States.pdf.

State Higher Education Executive Officers. State Higher Education Finance FY 2006. Boulder, CO: SHEEO, 2007. http://www.sheeo.org/finance/shef_fy06.pdf.

Western Interstate Commission on Higher Education. Knocking at the College Door. http://www.wiche.edu/policy/Knocking/1988-2018/index.asp.

National Center for Higher Education Management Systems. The NCHEMS Information Center for State Higher Education Policymaking and Analysis. http://www.higheredinfo.org/.

Boyd, D. State spending for higher education in the coming decade. Boulder, CO: National Center

for Higher Education Management Systems, 2002. http://www.nchems.org/pubs/docs/State_Spending.pdf.

National Center for Education Statistics. Enrollment in educational institutions, by level and control of institution (Table 3). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d05/tables/dt05_003.asp.

Allen, I. E., & J. Seaman. Entering the Mainstream. Needham, MA: The Sloan Consortium, 2004. http://www.sloan-c.org/resources/entering_mainstream.pdf.

Allen, I. E., & J. Seaman. Making the Grade. Needham, MA: The Sloan Consortium, 2006. http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/survey/pdf/making_the_grade.pdf.

National Center for Education Statistics. Postsecondary expectations, plans, and attendance through 1994. Washington, DC: NCES, 1998. http://nces.ed.gov/pubs98/access/98105-9.asp.

National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education. The affordability of higher education. http://www.highereducation.org/reports/affordability_pa/affordability_pa.shtml.

Meyer, K. A. Cost-efficiencies of online learning. ASHE Higher Education Report Series 32(1). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2006.

Twigg, C. A. Improving quality and reducing costs: The case for redesign. In Course Corrections 32–49, 2005. http://www.collegecosts.info/pdfs/solution_papers/Collegecosts_Oct2005.pdf.

Twigg, C. A. Improving quality and reducing cost: Designs for effective learning. Change 35(4): 23–29, 2003.

Twigg, C. A. Improving quality and reducing costs: New models for online learning. Educause Review 38(5): 28–38, 2003. http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/erm0352.pdf.

Twigg, C. A. Improving learning and reducing costs: Lessons learned from round I of the Pew Grant Program in Course Redesign, 2002. http://center.rpi.edu/PCR/R1Lessons.html.

Waddoups, G. L., G. L. Hatch & S. Butterworth. Balancing efficiency and effectiveness in first year reading and writing. In J. Bourne & J. C. Moore (Eds.), Elements of Quality Online Education: Practice and Direction, vol. 4, 103–115. Needham, MA: The Sloan Consortium, 2003.

Campbell, J. O., J. R. Bourne, P. J. Mosterman, M. Nahvi, R. Rassai, A. J. Brodersen & M. Dawant. Cost-effective distributed learning with electronics labs. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 8(3): 5–10, 2004. http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v8n3/pdf/v8n3_campbell.pdf.

Fisher, S. & T. I. Nygren. Experiments in the cost-effective uses of technology in teaching: Lessons from the Mellon program so far, 2000. http://www.ceutt.org.

Arvan, L., J. C. Ory, C. D. Bullock, K. K. Burnaska & M. Hanson. The SCALE efficiency projects. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 2(2): 33–60, 1998. http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v2n2/pdf/v2n2_arvan.pdf.

Milam, J. Cost analysis of online courses. Paper presented at the Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research. Cincinnati, OH: May 21-23, 2000.

Bodain, Y. & J. Robert. Investigating distance learning on the Internet, 2000. http://www.isoc.org/inet2000/cdproceedings/6a/6a_4.htm.

Ehrmann, S. C. Asking the hard questions about technology use and education. Change 31(2): 25–29, 1999.

Harkness, W. L., J. L. Lane & J. T. Harwood. A cost-effective model for teaching elementary statistics with improved student performance. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 7(2): 8–17, 2003. http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v7n2/pdf/v7n2_harkness.pdf.

Chickering, A. W. & Z. F. Gamson. Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin 39(7): 3–7, 1987. http://www.cord.edu/dept/assessment/sevenprin.htm.

Miller, G. E. Penn State’s World Campus: A case study in achieving cost efficiencies in ALN. In J. Bourne & J. C. Moore (Eds.), Online Education, 163–172. Needham, MA: The Sloan Consortium, 2001.

Twigg, C. A. Improving learning and reducing costs: Redesigning large enrollment courses. Center for Academic Transformation at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute: Troy, NY, 1999.

Brown, G., C. B. Myers & S. Roy. Formal course design and the student learning experience. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 7(3): 66–76, 2003. http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v7n3/v7n3_myers.asp.

Henderson, T. Using activity-based costing to inform university assessment. A paper presented at the Western Cooperative for Educational Telecommunications Annual Conference: November 11, 2004, San Antonio, Texas.

Meyer, K. A., J. Bruwelheide & R. Poulin. Developing knowledge through practical experience: The principles of financial sustainability for online programs. The Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration 10(2): 2007. http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/summer102/meyer102.htm.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v12i1.1707