Christine Geith, Karen Vignare


One of the key concepts in the right to education is access: access to the means to fully develop as human beings as well as access to the means to gain skills, knowledge and credentials. This is an important perspective through which to examine the solutions to access enabled by Open Educational Resources (OER) and online learning. The authors compare and contrast OER and online learning and their potential for addressing human rights “to” and “in” education. The authors examine OER and online learning growth and financial sustainability and explore potential scenarios to address the global education gap.


Online Learning,Open Education Resources,OER,OpenCourseWare,Sustainable Business Models,Innovation

Full Text:



Mayadas, A. F. Testimony to the Kerrey Commission on web-based education. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 5(1): 134–138, 2001.

Dringus, L. P., and S. Terrell. The framework for DIRECTED online learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education 2(1): 55–67, 1999.

Willinsky, J. The Access Principle: The Case for Open Access to Research and Scholarship. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2005.

Albright, P. Final forum report: Open Educational Resources. 2005. Available online

UNESCO web site January 2008

OECD Giving knowledge for free: The emergence of open educational resources. 2007. Available online at

Udas, K. International Perspectives on the Impact of Open Educational Resources and Open Source Software on Education. In Proceedings of Open Education 2007: Localizing and Learning. Logan, UT, 2007.

Bissell, A. Some Guiding Principles for Legal and Technical Interoperability in OER. In Proceedings of Open Education 2007: Localizing and Learning. Logan, UT, 2007.

Smith, M. S. & C. M. Casserly. The promise of open educational resources. Change 38(5): 8–17, 2006.

Tomasevski, K. Right to Education Primers No. 3, 2001. Available online at

Global Education Digest 2006: Comparing Education Statistics around the World. UNESCO: Institute for Statistics, Montreal, Canada, 2006.

Atkins, D. E., J. S. Brown & A. L. Hammond. A Review of the Open Educational Resources Movement: Achievements, Challenges and New Opportunities. A Report to the Hewlett Foundation, 2007. Available online at

Education Digest 2006. National Center for Education Statistics. Department of Education. Washington, D.C., 2006.

Vignare, K., C. Geith & S. Schiffman. Business models for online learning: An exploratory survey. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 10(2): May, 2006.

Allen, I. E. and J. Seaman. Online Nation: Five Years of Growth in Online Learning. Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium, 2007.

Allen, I. E. and J. Seaman. Making the Grade: Online in the Education in the United State, 2006. Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium, 2006.

Allen, I. E. and J. Seaman. Growing by Degrees: Online Education in the United States, 2005. Needham, MA: The Sloan Consortium, 2005.

Allen, I. E. and J. Seaman. Entering the Mainstream: The Quality and Extent of Online Education, 2003 and 2004. Needham, MA: The Sloan Consortium, 2004.

Allen, I. E. and J. Seaman. Sizing the Opportunity: The Quality and Extent of Online Education in the United States 2002–2003. Needham, MA: The Sloan Consortium, 2003.

OECD E-Learning in Tertiary Education: Where do We Stand. OECD. Paris, France, 2005.

Training Magazine, Training 2007 Industry Report, 2007.

Schiffman, S., K. Vignare & C. Geith. Why do institutions pursue online learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 11(2): 2007.

Education Digest 1995. National Center for Education Statistics. Department of Education. Washington, D.C., 1995.

Russell, T. The no significant difference phenomenon: A comparative research annotated bibliography on technology for distance education: As reported in 355 research reports, summaries and papers. Montgomery, AL: International Distance Education Certification Center, 2001. Retrieved January 28, 2005, from

Shea, P. J., K. Swan, E. E. Fredericksen & A. Pickett. Student satisfaction and reported learning in the SUNY learning network. Elements of Quality Online Education, Vol. 3, 145–156. Needham, MA: Sloan-C, 2001.

Zhao, Y., J. Lei, B. Y. C. Lai & H. S. Tan. What makes the difference? A practical analysis of research on the effectiveness of distance education. Teachers College Record 107(8): 1836–1884, 2005.

Sitzmann, T., K. Kraiger, D. Stewart & R. Wisher. The comparative effectiveness of web-based and classroom instruction: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology 59: 623–664, 2006.

Garrison, D. R. & H. Kanuka. Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education 7(2): 95–105, 2004.

Shea, P., A. Pickett & W. Pelz. A follow up investigation of ‘teacher presence’ in the SUNY Learning Network. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 7(2): 61–80, 2003.

Swan, K. A constructivist model for thinking about learning online. In J. Bourne & J. C. Moore (Eds.), Elements of Quality Online Education: Engaging Communities, 13–30. Needham, MA: Sloan-C, 2005.

Phillips, D.C. & J. F. Soltis. Perspectives on Learning (4th ed.). New York: Teachers College Press, 2004.

Rovai, A. P. A constructivist approach to online learning. The Internet and Higher Education. 7(2): 79–93, 2004.

Harasim, L., S. R. Hiltz, L. Teles & M. Turroff. Learning Networks: A Field Guide to Teaching and Learning Online. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1995.

Twigg, C. Improving learning and reducing costs: New models for online learning. Educause Review 38(5): 28–38, 2003.

Burgstahler, S. Access to Internet-Based Instruction for People with Disabilities. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Inc., 2000.

Schenker, K. & L. Scadden. The design of accessible distance education environments that use collaborative learning. Journal of Information Technologies and Disabilities 8(1): 200). Retrieved May 14, 2005 from

Moisey, S. Students with disabilities in distance education: Characteristics, course enrollment and completion, and support services. Journal of Distance Education 19(1): 73–91, 2004.

Richardson, J., G. Long & A. Woodley. Academic engagement and perceptions of quality in distance education. Open Learning 18(3): 223–244, 2003.

Long, G. & D. Beil. The importance of direct communication during continuing education workshops for deaf and hard-of-hearing professionals. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 2006.

Vignare, K. & J. Sener. Successful online bio-terrorism courses meet needs of learners. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 9(4): 2005.

Open Learning Exchange website, accessed September 2007.

African Virtual University website, accessed September 2007.

Dzvimbo, K. The African Virtual University: A Strategic Approach to Open Educational Resources. LINC Symposium. Cambridge, MA, 2005.

Virtual University for Small States of the Commonwealth website, accessed September 2007

Hylen, J. Open educational resources: Opportunities and challenges. OECD’s Center for Educational Research and Innovation. Paris, France, 2006.

MIT OpenCourseWare website, accessed September 2007.

Open CourseWare Consortium website, accessed September 2007.

Wiley, D. and M. Jensen. Utah OpenCourseWare Alliance. In Proceedings of Open Education 2007: Localizing and Learning. Logan, UT, 2007.

Grayson, C., D. Coughanour & A. Cannon. Open for Business: Open Education in the Corporate World. In Proceedings of Open Education 2007: Localizing and Learning. Logan, UT, 2007.

Geser, G. Open educational practices and resources: OLCOS Roadmap 2012. Open Learning Content Observatory Services. Salzburg, Austria, 2007.

Bissell, A. ccLearn and OER Custom Search. In Proceedings of Open Education 2007: Localizing and Learning. Logan, UT, 2007.

Merlot website, accessed September 2007.

Curriki website, accessed September 2007.

OER Commons website, accessed September 2007.

Connexions website September 2007

Downes, S. Models for sustainable open educational resources. National Research Council Canada, Canada. Ed. A Koohang. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects 3: 29–44, 2007.

Wiley, D. On the sustainability of open educational resources in higher education. OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and innovation. Paris, France, 2006.

Monterey Institute for Technology in Education website, accessed September 2007.

Tapscott, D. & A. D. Williams. Wikinomics: How mass collaboration changes everything. Portfolio, NY, NY, 2006.

Arno, K. Dual licensing: A business model from the second generation of open-source companies. In M. Wynants and J. Cornelis (Eds.), How Open is the Future? Economic, Social and Cultural Scenarios inspired by Free and Open-Source Software. Crosstalks & VUB Brussels University Press, 2005.

Connexions website, accessed January 2008.

MIT Open Courseware website, accessed January 2008.

Wiley, D. Open Education License. In Proceedings of Open Education 2007: Localizing and Learning. Logan, UT, 2007.

Creative Commons website, accessed January 2008.

Tucker, K. Say "Libre" for Knowledge and Learning Resources, 2007. Available online

Christensen, C. M. The Innovator’s Dilemma. Harper Collins. New York. 2003.

Anderson, C. The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business is Selling Less of More. Hyperion. NY. 2006.

Venkaiah, V. Localizing Open Educational Resources for Higher Education in India: A Consortium Model. In Proceedings of Open Education 2007: Localizing and Learning. Logan, UT, 2007.

Fay, J. & J. Sjogren. The Open Source Online University. Panel conducted at The Fourth Annual Conference of Learning International Networks Consortium (LINC), Amman, Jordan, October, 2007.

Taylor, J. C. Open Courseware Futures: Creating a Parallel Universe. e-JIST 10(1): October, 2007.

Grabinger, R. S., & J. C. Dunlap. Rich Environments for Active Learning in the Higher Education Classroom. In Brent G. Wilson (ed), Constructivist Learning Environments: Case Studies in Instructional Design. Educational Technology Publications: Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1996.

Atwell, G. Personal Learning Environments: The Future of eLearning? eLearning Papers 2(1): 2007.


Copyright (c) 2019 Christine Geith, Karen Vignare