Jodi Asbell-Clarke, Elizabeth Rowe


Online education is a rapidly growing phenomenon for science teachers. Using a sample of 40 online science courses for teachers offered during the 2004–2005 academic year, the Learning Science Online (LSO) study examines the nature and variety of instructional methods and activities as well as communication, and students’ perceptions of supports within the course. This research is unique in that it is the first aggregate study of online science courses offered by a wide variety of educational programs. Descriptive analyses suggest the instructional methods employed in online science courses for teachers
include frequent use of online discussions and students participated in minds-on activities, including articulation and reflection on their scientific ideas, posing questions, analyzing data, and drawing conclusions from evidence. Hands-on instructional activities were rarely used, and pen-and-paper and collaborative instructional activities were occasionally used. Technology was used primarily for communications such as discussion boards, email, and chat, but there were very few other computerbased
tools used within the courses. Students felt supported by instructors, other students, and the course design.


Science Education,Online Learning,Asynchronous Learning,Teacher Professional Development

Full Text:



National Center for Education Statistics. Digest of Education Statistics, 2005. U.S. Department of Education, (NCES 2006-005), 2005. http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d05/.

Allen, I. E. and J. Seaman. Entering the Mainstream: The Quality and Extent of Online Education in the United States, 2003 and 2004. Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium, 2004. http://www.sloanc.org/publications/survey/pdf/entering_mainstream.pdf.

Allen, I. E. and J. Seaman. Making the Grade: Online Education in the United States, 2006. Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium, 2006. http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/survey/pdf/making_the_grade.pdf.

Scarafiotti, C. and M. Cleveland-Innis. The times they are a-changing. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 10(2): 2006.

Obbink, K. and G. Wheeler. Teaching and learning via the network: National Teacher Enhancement Network. Network Coalition for Networked Information, Project Number 33, 1993. http://www.cni.org/projects/netteach/1993/prop33.html.

Scanlon, E., C. Colwell, M. Cooper and T. Di Paolo. Remote experiments, re-versioning and rethinking science learning. Computers and Education 43(1–2): 153–163, 2004.

Seiber, J. E. Misconceptions and realities about teaching online. Science and Engineering Ethics 11: 329–340, 2005.

Paloff, R. and K. Platt. Building Learning Communities in Cyberspace: Effective Strategies for the Online Classroom: 21–32, 73–86, 167. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 1999.

Allen, I. E. and J. Seaman. Growing by Degrees: Online Education in the United States, 2005. Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium, 2005. http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/survey/pdf/growing_by_degrees.pdf.

Garrison, D., T. Anderson and W. Archer. Critical inquiry in a text based environment; Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education 2(2–3): 1–19, 2000.

Dede, C., P. Whitehouse and T. Brown-L'Bahy. Designing and studying learning experiences that use multiple interactive media to bridge distance and time. Current Perspectives on Applied Information Technologies 1: Distance Education, 2002.

Vygotsky, L. S. Mind and Society: The Development of Higher Mental Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.

National Research Council. National Science Education Standards. Washington, D.C., National Academy Press, 1996.

Loucks-Horsley, S. The role of teaching and learning in systemic reform: A focus on professional development. Science Educator 7(1): 1–6, 1998.

Kuhn, D. Theory of mind, metacognition, and reasoning: a life-span perspective. In P. Mitchell and K. J. Riggs (Eds.), Children's Reasoning and the Mind. Hove, UK: Psychology Press, 2000.

Blanchette, J. Textual interactions handbook: Computer-mediated conferencing. In D. Collett (Ed.), Learning Technologies in Distance Education, HB65–HB96. Edmonton, AB: University of Alberta, 1999.

Singer, S.R., M. L. Hilton and H. A. Schweingruber. (Eds.) America’s Lab Report: Investigations in High School Science. Committee on High School Science Laboratories: Role and Vision, National Research Council, 2005.

Woodfield, B. F., M. B. Andrus, T. Andersen, J. Miller, B. Simons, R. Stanger, G. L. Waddoups, M. S. Moore, R. Swan, R. Allen and G. Bodily. The Virtual ChemLab Project: A realistic and sophisticated simulation of organic synthesis and organic qualitative analysis. J. Chem. Ed, 82: 1728–1735, 2005.

Harlen, W. and C. Altobello. An Investigation of "Try Science" Studied On-Line and Face-to-Face. Cambridge, MA: TERC, 2003.

Sproull, L. and S. Keisler. Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science 32: 1492–1513, 1986.

Walther, J. Interpersonal effects in computer mediated interaction. Communication Research 21(4): 460–487, 1994.

Garrison, D. R. Cognitive presence for effective asynchronous online learning: the role of reflective inquiry, self-direction and metacognition. In J. Bourne and J. C. Moore (Eds.), Elements of Quality Online Education: Practice and Direction, 47–58. Needham, MA: Sloan-C, 2003.

Garrison, D. R., T. Anderson and W. Archer. Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education 11(2): 1–14, 2000. http://communitiesofinquiry.com/documents/CTinTextEnvFinal.pdf.

Short, J., E. Williams and B. Christie. The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. Toronto: Wiley, 1976.

Picciano, A. G. Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence and performance in an online course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 6(1): 2002.

Brown, R. The process of community building in distance learning classes. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 5(2): 18–35, 2001.

Anderson, T., L. Rourke, D. R. Garrison and W. Archer. Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 5(2): 1–17, 2001.

Madden, M. Internet Penetration and Impact. Pew Internet & American Life Project, Pew/Internet, Washington DC, 2006.

Wallace, R. Online learning in higher education: A review of research on interactions among teachers and students. Education, Communication & Information 3(2): 241–280, 2003.

Collison, G., B. Elbaum, S. Haavind and R. Tinker. Facilitating On-line Learning: Effective Strategies for Moderators. Madison, WI: Atwood Publishing, 2000.

Bonk, C., R. A. Wisher and J. Y. Lee. Moderating learner-centered e-learning: Problems and solutions, benefits and implications. In T. S. Roberts (Ed.), Online Collaborative Learning: Theory and Practice, 54–85. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing, 2004.

Arbaugh, J. B. How instructor immediacy behaviors affect student satisfaction and learning in web-based courses. Business Communication Quarterly 64(4): 42–45, 2001.

Arbaugh, J. B. Managing the on-line classroom: A study of technological and behavioral characteristics of web-based MBA courses. Journal of High Technology Management Research 13: 203–223, 2002.

Berge, Z. L. Barriers to online teaching in post-secondary institutions. Can policy changes fix it? Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration 1(2): 1998.

Garrison, D. Online collaboration principles. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 10(1): 2006.

Gunawardena, C. Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferences. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications 1(2/3): 147–166, 1995.

Rourke, L., T. Anderson, D. R. Garrison and W. Archer. Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education 14(2): 2001.

Swan, K. Building communities in online courses: the importance of interaction. Education, Communication and Information 2(1): 23–49, 2002.

Gunawardena, C. and F. Zittle. Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer mediated conferencing environment. American Journal of Distance Education 11(3): 8–26, 1997.

Richardson, J. C. and K. Swan. Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students' perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 7(1): 68–88, 2003.

Collins, A., J. S. Brown and A. Holum. Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible. American Educator 15(3): 6–11, 38–46, 1991.

Feger S. and M. Zibit. Online Facilitation: Building Professional Knowledge Among Participants. Presented at Technology as an Agent of Teaching and Learning, San Francisco, 2006.

Conrad, D. University instructors’ reflections on their first online teaching experiences. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 8(2): 32–44, 2004.

Borko, H., B. M. Stecher and S. McClam. Artifact packages for measuring instructional practice: A pilot study. Comparative Analysis of Current Assessment and Accountability Systems, The Regents of University of California, 2003.

Lave, J. and E. Wenger. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press, 1991.

Asbell-Clarke, J., E. Rowe, S. Leibowitz and P. Hubbard. Learning Science Online: A Descriptive Study of Online Science Courses for Teachers. Poster presented at AERA, San Francisco, 2006.

Asbell-Clarke, J. and E. Rowe. Learning Science Online: A Descriptive Study of Online Science Courses for Teachers. In press, to be released at http://www.terc.edu.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v11i3.1722

Copyright (c) 2019 Jodi Asbell-Clarke, Elizabeth Rowe