ONLINE VS. BLENDED LEARNING: DIFFERENCES IN INSTRUCTIONAL OUTCOMES AND LEARNER SATISFACTION

Doo Hun Lim, Michael L. Morris, Virginia W. Kupritz

Abstract


This study investigates differences in instructional and learner factors between two groups of learners exposed to online only and blended delivery formats, respectively, in an effort to compare learning outcomes and other instructional variables between online and blended delivery methods. Findings indicated that no significant differences existed in learning outcomes; however, significant differences existed in several instructional and learner factors between the two delivery format groups. Discussions about improving online or blended delivery method are presented based upon the research findings.


Keywords


Online Learning,Blended Learning,Learning Outcomes,Comparative Study

Full Text:

PDF

References


MacDonald, J. and E. McAteer. New Approaches to Supporting Students: Strategies for Blended Learning in Distance and Campus Based Environments. Journal of Educational Media 28(2/3): 129–147, 2003.

Bielawski, L. and D. Metcalf. Blended Elearning: Integrating Knowledge, Performance Support, and Online Learning. Amherst, MA: HRD Press, 2005.

Morabito, J., I. Sack and A. Bhate. Organization Modeling: Innovative Architectures for the 21st Century. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1999.

Kearsley, G. A Guide to Online Education, 1997. Online: http://home.sprynet.com/~gkearsley/online.htm.

Heinich, R., M. Molenda, J. D. Russell and S. E. Smaldino. Instructional Media and Technologies for Learning. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2003.

Otte, G and M. Benke. Online learning: New models for leadership and organization in higher education. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 10(2): 23–31, 2006.

Hannafin, M. J. Guidelines for using locus of instructional control in the design of computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Instructional Development 7(3): 6–10, 1984.

Berge, Z. L. The context of distance training. In Z. L. Berge (ed.), Sustaining Distance Training, 3–12. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2001.

Daniels, H. L. and D. M. Moore. Interaction of cognitive style and learner control in a hypermedia environment. International Journal of Instructional Media 27(4): 1–15, 2000.

Oh, E. and D. H. Lim. Cross relationships between cognitive styles and learner variables in online learning environment. Journal of Interactive Online Learning 4(1): 53–66, 2005.

Sergiovanni, T. J. Building Community in Schools. New York: Jossey-Bass, 1994.

Fontaine, G. Presence in “Teleland.” In K. E. Rudestam and J. Schoenholtz-Read (eds.), Handbook of Online Learning: Innovations in Higher Education and Corporate Training, 21–52. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2002.

Reece, M. and B. Lockee. Improving training outcomes through blended learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 9(4): 49–57, 2005.

Picciano, A. G. Blended learning: Implications for growth and access. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 10(3): 85–91, 2006.

Singh, H. and C. Reed. A White Paper: Achieving Success with Blended Learning: 2001 ASTD State of the Industry Report. Alexandria, VA: American Society for Training & Development, 2001.

Thorne, K. Blended Learning: How to Integrate Online & Traditional Learning. London: Korgan Page Ltd, 2003.

Osguthorpe, T. R. and R. C. Graham. Blended learning environments. Quarterly Review of Distance Education 4(3): 227–233, 2003.

Rossman, G. B. and B. L. Wilson. Numbers and words revisited: Being “Shamelessly Eclectic”. Evaluation Review 9(5): 626–643, 1991.

Miles, M. B. and A. M. Huberman. Qualitative Data Analysis, (2nd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2004.

Spradley, J. P. The Ethnographic Interview. Austin, TX: Holt, Reinhart and Winston, 1979.

Creswell, J. W. Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994.

Lim, D. H. Perceived differences between classroom and distance education: Seeking instructional strategies for learning application. International Journal of Educational Technology 3(1): 2002. www.outreach.uiuc.edu/ijet/v3n1/d-lim/index.html.

Relan, A. and B. Gillani. Web-based instruction and the traditional classroom: Similarities and differences. In B. Khan (ed.), Web-based Instruction, 41–47. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications, 41–47, 1997.

Russell, T. L. No Significant Difference Phenomenon, 1999.

Wentling, T. and S. Johnson. The design and development of an evaluation system for online instruction. In P. Kuchinke, (ed.), Proceedings of the 1999 Academy Human Resource Development Annual Conference, 548–553. Washington, DC: Academy of HRD, 1999.

Lim, D. H. Fixed versus flexible learning: Differences in learning, application, and instructional perception. In T. M. Eagan and L. Morris (eds.), Proceedings of the 2004 Academy of Human Resource Development Annual Conference, 1060–1066. Austin, TX: Academy of HRD, 2004.

McMillan, D.W. and D. M. Chavis. Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology 14(1): 6–23, 1986.

Baldwin, T. T. and J. K. Ford. Transfer of training: A review and directions for future research. Personnel Psychology 4(1): 63–105, 1988.

Clark, R. and D. Taylor. Training problem solving skills using cognitive strategies: Novice versus expert problem solvers. Performance and Instruction 31(3): 32–37, 1992.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v11i2.1725



Copyright (c) 2019 Doo Hun Lim, Michael L. Morris, Virginia W. Kupritz