AN EMPIRICAL VERIFICATION OF THE COMMUNITY OF INQUIRY FRAMEWORK
Keywords:Community of Inquiry Framework, Verification
The purpose of this paper is to report on the results of a study that examines whether the CoI dimensions of social, teaching and cognitive presence distinctively exist in e-learning environments. The rest of the paper is organized as follows. First, I will briefly review recent studies on the dimensions of this framework: social, cognitive, and teaching presence. Second, I discuss the development of the sample of MBA students in online courses over a two-year period at a Midwestern U.S. university and the items used to measure the CoI dimensions. Next, I will describe the results of an exploratory factor analysis, including an interpretation of the emerging factors. Finally, I will discuss how these findings relate to conclusions presented in Garrison’s review of recent research related to the CoI and present some possible directions for future research.
Alavi, M. and D. E. Leidner. Research commentary: Technology-mediated learning—A call for greater depth and breadth of research. Information Systems Research 12(1): 1–10, 2001.
Benbunan-Fich, R., S. R. Hiltz and L. Harasim. The online interaction learning model: An integrated theoretical framework for learning networks. In: S. R. Hiltz and R. Goldman (Eds.), Learning Together Online: Research on Asynchronous Learning Networks, 19–37. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers, 2005.
Rungtusanatham, M., L. M. Ellram, S. P. Siferd and S. Salik. Toward a typology of business education in the internet age. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education 2(2): 101–120, 2004.
Garrison, D. R., T. Anderson and W. Archer. Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education 2: 87–105, 2000.
Arbaugh, J. B. and A. Hwang. Does “teaching presence” exist in online MBA courses? The Internet and Higher Education 9: 9–21, 2006. A preliminary analysis of the data used in Arbaugh and Hwang’s study examined items that measured student perceptions of course design and both the instructor and other learners roles in facilitation of discourse and direct instruction. A factor analysis showed that these items loaded on two factors: (1) Instructor behaviors and (2) Student behaviors.
Richardson, J. C. and K. Swan. Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students’ perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 7(1): 2003. http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v7n1/v7n1_richardson.asp.
Shea, P. J., E. E. Fredericksen, A. M. Pickett and W. E. Pelz. A preliminary investigation of “teaching presence” in the SUNY learning network. In: J. Bourne and Janet C. Moore (Eds.), Elements of Quality Online Education: Into the Mainstream, Vol. 4, 279–312. Needham, MA: Sloan-C, 2003.
Wise, A., J. Chang, T. Duffy and R. del Valle. The effects of teacher social presence on student satisfaction, engagement, and learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research 31: 247–271, 2004.
Garrison, D. R., M. Cleveland-Innes and T. Fung. Student role adjustment in online communities of inquiry: Model and instrument validation. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 8(2): 2004. http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v8n2/v8n2_garrison.asp.
Garrison, D. R. Online community of inquiry review: Social, cognitive, and teaching presence issues. Paper presented at the Sloan-C Summer workshop, Baltimore, MD, 2006.
Gunawardena, C. and F. Zittle. Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer mediated conferencing environment. American Journal of Distance Education 11(3): 8–26, 1997.
Short, J., E. Williams and B. Christie. The Social Psychology of Telecommunication. London: Wiley, 1976.
Rourke, L., T. Anderson, D. R. Garrison and W. Archer. Methodological Issues in the Content Analysis of Computer Conference Transcripts. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 12(1): 8–22, 2001.
Walther, J. Interpersonal effects in computer mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research 19(1): 52–90, 1992.
Garrison, D. R. and M. Cleveland-Innes. Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. American Journal of Distance Education 19(3): 133–148, 2005.
Beuchot, A. and M. Bullen. Interaction and interpersonality in online discussion forums. Distance Education 26(1): 67–87, 2005.
Anagnostopoulos, D., K. G. Basmadjian and R. S. McCrory. The decentered teacher and the construction of social space in the virtual classroom. Teachers College Record 107: 1699–1729, 2005.
Molinari, D. L. The role of social comments in problem-solving groups in an online class. American Journal of Distance Education 18(2): 89–101, 2004.
Celani, M. A. A. and H. Collins. Critical thinking in reflective sessions and in online interactions. AILA Review 18: 41–57, 2005.
Garrison, D. R., T. Anderson and W. Archer. Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education 15(1): 7–23, 2001.
Dewey, J. How We Think. Boston: Heath, 1933.
Dauer, F. W. Critical Thinking: An Introduction to Reasoning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.
Dewey, J. My pedagogic creed. In: Dewey, J. (Ed.), Dewey on Education, New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, 19–32, 1959.
Moore, J. L. and R. M. Marra. A comparative analysis of online discussion participation protocols. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 38: 191–212, 2005.
Duphorne, P. L. and C. N. Gunawardena. The effect of three computer conferencing designs on critical thinking skills of nursing students. American Journal of Distance Education 19(1): 37–50, 2005.
Schrire, S. Interaction and Cognition in Asynchronous Computer Conferencing. Instructional Science: An International Journal of Learning and Cognition 32: 475–502, 2004.
Oriogun P. K. Towards understanding online learning levels of engagement using the SQUAD approach. Australian Journal of Educational Technology 19(3): 371–388, 2003. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet19/ajet19.html.
Lee, J-M. and Y. Lee. Personality types and learners’ interaction in web-based threaded discussion. Quarterly Review of Distance Education 7(1): 83–94, 2006.
Anderson, T., L. Rourke, D. R. Garrison and W. Archer. Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 5(2), 2001. http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v5n2/v5n2_anderson.asp.
Fahy, P. J. Use of linguistic qualifiers and intensifiers in a computer conference. American Journal of Distance Education 16(1): 5–22, 2002.
Jefferies, P., F. Grodzinsky and J. Griffin. Advantages and problems in using information communication technologies to support the teaching of a multi-institutional computer ethics course. Journal of Educational Media 28(2–3): 191–202, 2003.
Shea, P. J. A study of students’ sense of learning community in online learning environments. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 10(1): 2006. http://www.sloanc.org/publications/jaln/v10n1/v10n1_4shea.asp.
LaPointe, D. K. and C. N. Gunawardena. Developing, testing, and refining a model to understand the relationship between peer interaction and learning outcomes in computer-mediated conferencing. Distance Education 25(1): 83–106, 2004.
Conrad, D. L. Engagement, excitement, anxiety, and fear: Learners’ experiences of starting an online course. American Journal of Distance Education 16(4): 205–226, 2002.
Stein, D. S., C. E. Wanstreet, J. Calvin, C. Overtoom and J. E. Wheaton. Bridging the transactional distance gap in online learning environments. American Journal of Distance Education 19(2): 105–118, 2005.
Hair, J. F. Jr., R. E. Anderson, R. L. Tatham and W. C. Black. Multivariate Data Analysis (3rd Ed.). New York: MacMillan, 1992.
Stevens, J. P. Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences (4th Ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2002.
Cattell, R. B. The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research 1: 245–276, 1966.
Kaiser, H. F. The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement 20: 141–151, 1960.
Nunnally, J. C. Psychometric Theory (2nd Ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.
Gorsuch, R. L. Factor Analysis (2nd Ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1983.
Jarvenpaa, S. L. and D. E. Leidner. Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science 10: 791–815, 1999.
Jarvenpaa. S. L., T. R. Shaw and D. S. Staples. Toward contextualized theories of trust: The role of trust in global virtual teams. Information Systems Research 15: 250–267, 2004.
Hodgson, V. and P. Watland. Researching networked management learning. Management Learning 35(2): 99–116, 2004.
Arnold, N. and L. Ducate. Future foreign language teachers’ social and cognitive collaboration in an online environment. Language Learning & Technology 10(1): 42–66, 2006. Retrieved June 23, 2006 from http://llt.msu.edu/vol10num1/pdf/arnoldducate.pdf.
Meyer, K. A. Evaluating online discussions: Four different frames of analysis. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 8(2): 101–114, 2004.
Benbunan-Fich, R. and J. B. Arbaugh. Separating the effects of knowledge construction and group collaboration in web-based courses. Information & Management 43: 778–793, 2006.
Brower, H. H. On emulating classroom discussion in a distance-delivered OBHR course: Creating an on-line community. Academy of Management Learning and Education 2(1): 22–36, 2003.
Coppola, N. W., S. R. Hiltz and N. G. Rotter. Becoming a virtual professor: Pedagogical roles and asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Management Information Systems 18(4): 169–189, 2002.
Drago, W., J. Peltier and D. Sorensen. Course content or instructor – Which is more important in online teaching? Management Research News 25(6/7): 69–83, 2002.
Garrison, D. R., T. Anderson and W. Archer. A theory of critical inquiry in online distance education. In: M. G. Moore & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of Distance Education, 113–127. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2003.
Arbaugh, J. B. How much does “subject matter” matter? A study of disciplinary effects in on-line MBA courses. Academy of Management Learning & Education 4: 57–73, 2005.
Wallace, R. M. Online Learning in Higher Education: A review of research on interactions among teachers and students. Education, Communication, and Information 3(2): 241–280, 2002.
Arbaugh, J. B. Is there an optimal design for on-line MBA courses? Academy of Management Learning & Education 4: 135–149, 2005.
Finlay, W. K., C. K. Desment and L. K. Evans. Is it the technology or is it the teacher? A comparison of online and traditional English composition classes. Journal of Educational Computing Research 31: 163–180, 2004.
Martins, L. L. and F. W. Kellermanns. A model of business school students’ acceptance of a web-based course management system. Academy of Management Learning and Education 3: 7–26, 2004.
Hiltz, S. R. and P. Shea. The student in the online classroom. In: S. R. Hiltz & R. Goldman (Eds.) Learning Together Online: Research on Asynchronous Learning Networks, 145–168. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers, 2005.
Schniederjans, M. J. and E. B. Kim. Relationship of student undergraduate achievement and personality characteristics in a total web-based environment: An empirical study. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education 3: 205–221, 2005.
Dziuban, C., P. Shea and J. B. Arbaugh. Faculty roles and satisfaction in asynchronous learning networks. In: S. R. Hiltz and R. Goldman (Eds.), Learning Together Online: Research on Asynchronous Learning Networks, 169–190. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers, 2005.
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions