DISTANCE EDUCATION COMMUNICATIONS: THE SOCIAL PRESENCE AND MEDIA RICHNESS OF INSTANT MESSAGING

Stephen J. Kuyath, Susan J. Winter

Abstract


Instant messaging (IM) is changing the way we communicate with each other and may prove to be a more effective communication tool for distance learning environments than the more commonly used discussion groups and email. Media richness and social presence theories are described and young adults’ perception of IM’s richness and social presence are determined. In addition, preferences for using instant messaging for communicating messages of low, medium, and high levels of equivocality were investigated. The results indicate that young adults perceive IM to fall between email and the telephone in both social presence and media richness. As message equivocality increases, preference for the use of the telephone increases while preference for the use of email decreases. Preference for the use of IM increases for messages of intermediate equivocality, but decreases for those of high equivocality. Overall, young adults prefer IM over email as a communication tool, but prefer the phone over IM. Implications for media richness theory, social presence theory, and distance learning are described.


Keywords


Social Presence,Media Richness,Instant Messaging,Distance Education

Full Text:

PDF

References


Williamson, C., J. T. Bernhard and K. Chamberlin. Perspectives on an Internet-Based Synchronous Distance Learning Experience. Journal of Engineering Education 89(1): 53–61, 2000.

Daily, B. and M. Daily. Effectiveness of a Multimedia Televised Distance Education Program for Engineering Majors. Journal of Engineering Education 83(4): 1–5, 1994.

Boulet, M. M. and S. Boudreeault. Using Technology to Deliver Distance Education in Computer Science. Journal of Engineering Education 87(4): 433–436, 1998.

Dutton, J., M. Dutton and J. Perry. Do Online Students Perform as Well as Lecture Students? Journal of Engineering Education 90(1): 131–136, 2001.

Webster, T. J. and K. M. Haverstroh. An Interactive, Video-Teleconferenced, Graduate Course in Biomedical Engineering. Journal of Engineering Education 91(2): 159–166, 2002.

Latchman, H. A. and S. M. Latchman. Bringing the Classroom to Students Everywhere. Journal of Engineering Education 89(4): 429–433, 2000.

Wallace, D. R. and P. Mutooni. A Comparative Evaluation of World Wide Web-Based and Classroom Teaching. Journal of Engineering Education 86(3): 211–219, 1997.

Kadiyala, M. and B. L. Crynes. A Review of Literature on Effectiveness of Use of Information Technology in Education. Journal of Engineering Education 89(2): 177–189, 2000.

Burleson, W., A. Ganz and I. Harris. Educational Innovations in Multimedia Systems. Journal of Engineering Education 90(1): 21–31, 2001.

Swan, K. Virtual interactivity: design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses. Distance Education 22(2): 306–33, 2001.

Rourke, L., T. Anderson, D. R. Garrison and W. Archer. Assessing Social Presence In Asynchronous Text-based Computer Conferencing. Journal of Distance Education 5(2): 2001.

Swan, K. Immediacy, social presence, and asynchronous discussion. In J. Bourne and J. C. Moore (Eds.) Elements of Quality Online Education, Volume 3. Needham, MA: Sloan-C, 2002.

Swan, K. Learning online: current research on issues of interface, teaching presence and learner characteristics. In J. Bourne and J. C. Moore (Eds.) Elements of Quality Online Education, Into the Mainstream, 63–79. Needham, MA: Sloan-C, 2004.

Swan, K. and L. F. Shih. On The Nature And Development of Social Presence In Online Course Discussions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 9(3): 2005.

Fredricksen, E., A. Pickett, P. Shea, W. Pelz, and K. Swan. Student Satisfaction and Perceived Learning with OnLine Courses: Principles and Examples from the SUNY Learning Networks. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 4(2): 7–41, 2000.

Cohen, M. S. and T. J. Ellis. Developing Criteria for an On-Line Learning Environment: From the Student and Faculty Perspectives. Journal of Engineering Education 93(2): 161–167, 2004.

Richardson, J. C. and K. Swan, K. Examining Social Presence in Online Courses in Relation to Students’ Perceived Learning and Satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 7(1): 68–88, February 2003.

Hung, Y. C., W. C. Kong, A. L. Chua and C. E. Hull. Reexamining Media Capacity Theories using Workplace Instant Messaging. Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2006.

Garrison, D. R., T. Anderson and W. Archer. Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education. The Internet and Higher Education 2(2–3): 87–105, 2000.

Carnevale, D. Study Assesses What Participants Look for in High-Quality Online Courses. Chronicle of Higher Education 47(9): A46, 2000.

Kubala, T. Addressing Student Needs: Teaching on the Internet. T.H.E. Journal 25(8): March 1998.

Shiu, E and Lenhart, A. How Americans use instant messaging. Pew Internet. 2005. http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Instantmessage_Report.pdf.

Mingail, S. Instant Messaging: Next best thing since e-mail? Gartner: 2005. http://www.gartner.com.

Kirsner, S. IM is here. RU prepared? Ecosystem Magazine: 2005. http://www.darwinmag.com/read/020102/ecosystem.html.

Miranda, S. M. and C. S. Saunders. The Social Construction of Meaning: An Alternative Perspective on Information Sharing. Information Systems Research 14(1): 87–106, 2003.

Cameron, A. F. and J. Webster. Unintended consequences of emerging communication technologies: Instant Messaging in the workplace. Computers in Human Behavior 21: 85–103, 2005.

Daft, R. L., R. H. Lengel and L. K. Trevino. Message Equivocality, Media Selection, and Manager Performance: Implications for Information Systems. MIS Quarterly 11(3): 355–366, September 1987.

Walther, J. Relational aspects of computer-mediated communication: Experimental observations over time. Organization Science 6: 189–203, 1995.

Sproull, L. and S. Kiesler. Reducing Social context cures: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science. 32: 1492–1512, 1986.

Tabachnick, B. G. and L. S. Fidell. Using Multivariate Statistics (4th Ed). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon, 2001.

Cohen, J., P. Cohen, S. G. West and L. S.Aiken. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (3rd Ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2003.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v10i4.1751



Copyright (c) 2019 Stephen J. Kuyath, Susan J. Winter