ARE ONLINE COURSES CANNIBALIZING STUDENTS FROM EXISTING COURSES?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v9i3.1781Keywords:
Student Demographics, Online Comparison, Student Location, Distance LearningAbstract
One of the reasons most often cited for the increasing number and popularity of online courses is the format’s ability to provide access to students who cannot attend conventionally delivered face-to-face courses. Are these underserved students in fact the ones enrolling in online courses? Or are online course enrollees the same students who would otherwise be taking face-to-face courses? This analysis uses student registration information from six different online courses at two campuses of a Midwestern university to investigate how students taking online courses compare to the entire student population. In particular, this study addresses whether or not students take online courses to eliminate significant commuting time when they are located long distances from campus.
References
Internet World Stats. America Internet Usage and Population Statistics, 2005. Online: http://www.Internetworldstats.com/stats2.htm.
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). A Profile of Participation in Distance Education: 1999–2000. Education Statistics Quarterly 4(4): 2002. Online: http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2003605.
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). Distance Education at Degree-Granting Postsecondary Institutions: 2000–2001. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics Report, 2003. Online: http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2003017.
Kieman, V. A survey documents growth in distance education in late 1990s. Chronicle of Higher Education 49(48): A28, 2003.
Allen, I. E. and J. Seaman. Entering the mainstream: The quality and extent of online education in the United States, 2003 and 2004. Needham, MA: The Sloan Consortium, 2004. Online: http://www.sloan-c.org/resources/survey.asp.
Neuhauser, C. Learning style and effectiveness of online and face-to-face instruction. The American Journal of Distance Education 16(2): 99–113, 2002.
Ngu, B. Online instruction versus face-to-face instruction at UNIMAS. International Journal of Educational Technology 3(1): 1–19, 2002.
Allen, M., J. Bourhis, N. Burrell, and E. Malbry. Comparing student satisfaction with distance education to traditional classrooms in higher education: A meta-analysis. The American Journal of Distance Education 16(2): 83–97, 2002.
Hiltz, S. Impacts of college-level courses via asynchronous learning networks: Some preliminary results. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 1(2): 1–19, 1997.
Xenos, M., C. Pierrakeas, and P. Pintelas. A survey on student dropout rates and dropout causes concerning the students in course of informatics of the Hellenic Open University. Computers & Education 36(1): 361–377, 2002.
Muse, H. The Web-based community college student: An examination of factors that lead to success and risk. The Internet and Higher Education 6(1): 241–261, 2003.
Carr, S. As distance education comes of age, the challenge is keeping the students. Chronicle of Higher Education 46(23): A39, 2000.
Howell, S., D. Laws, and N. Lindsay. Reevaluating course completion in distance education: Avoiding the comparison between apples and oranges. Quarterly Review of Distance Education 5(4): 243–252, 2004.
Flowers, J. Online learning needs in technology education. Journal of Technology Education 13(1): 17–30, 2001.
Warbington, R. The advantages of online learning. Women in Business 53(6): 23–24, 2001.
Turner, F. and J. Crews. Bricks and clicks: A comparative analysis of online and traditional education settings. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning 2(4): 1–7, 2005.
Bocchi, J., J. Eastman, and C. Swift. Retaining the online learner: Profile of students in an online MBA program and implications of teaching them. Journal of Education for Business 79(4): 245–254, 2004.
Wirt, J., S. Choy, and P. Rooney. The Condition of Education 2004: Adult Participation in Work-Related Learning. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, 2004. Online: http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/2004/section1/indicator07.asp.
Zirkle, C. Distance education and career and technical education: A review of the research literature. Journal of Vocational Education Research 28(2): 2003. Online: http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JVER/v28n2/zirkle.html.
Kader, B. Gearing women towards embracing online learning. Computimes (Malaysia), April 16, 2001.
Wojciechowski, A. Individual student characteristics: Can any be predictors of success in online classes? Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration 8(2): 2005. Online: http://www.westga.edu/%7Edistance/ojdla/summer82/wojciechowski82.htm.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions
