A REVIEW OF RECENT PAPERS ON ONLINE DISCUSSION IN TEACHING AND LEARNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v9i3.1782Keywords:
Asynchronous Discussion, Literature Review, Case StudiesAbstract
This paper presents a review of a sample of recent case studies on the use of asynchronous online discussion in higher education. These studies are analyzed in terms of curriculum design, assumptions about teaching and learning, and claims and reported conditions for using online discussion. The claims made for asynchronous online discussion—in particular the opportunities for interaction between learners, and permanent access to these interactions—are found to be frequently based on social constructivist principles. Asynchronous online discussion is seen as offering additional value by providing learners with experience of computer communication tools and opportunities for taking part in group work. Several constraints on participation within online forums are described. These are discussed in relation to the nature of curriculum design, software design, tutor support, and learners’ attitudes and previous experience. The conditions under which asynchronous online discussion may best support learning are set out, and avenues for future research are suggested.
References
Wallace, R. Online learning in higher education: A review of research on interactions among teachers and students. Education, Communication and Information 3(2): 241–280, 2003.
Zhao, Y. and S. Rop. A critical review of the literature on electronic networks as reflective discourse communities for in-service teachers. Education and Information Technologies 6(1): 81–94, 2001.
Anderson, T., L. Rourke, R. Garrison, and W. Archer. Assessing teacher presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 5(2): 1–17, 2001.
Aviv, R. Educational performance of ALN via content analysis. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 4(2): 53–72, 2000.
Brown, R. The process of community-building in distance learning classes. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 5(2): 18–35, 2001.
van Weert, T. and A. Pilot. Task-based team learning with ICT: Design and development of new learning. Education and Information Technologies 8(2): 195–214, 2003.
Aviv, R. Z. Erlich, G. Ravid, A. Geva. Network analysis of knowledge construction in asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 7(3): 1– 23, 2003.
Biesenbach-Lucas, S. Asynchronous discussion groups in teacher training classes: Perceptions of native and non-native students. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 7(3): 24–46, 2003.
Campos, M. A constructivist method for the analysis of networked cognitive communication and the assessment of collaborative learning and knowledge-building. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 8(2): 1–29, 2004.
Curtis, D. and M. Lawson. Exploring collaborative online learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 5(1): 21–34, 2001.
Graddy, D. Gender and online discourse in the principles of economics. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 8(4): 3–14, 2004.
Koory, M. Differences in learning outcomes for the online and F2F versions of an introduction to Shakespeare. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 7(2): 18–34, 2003.
Kumari, D. Connecting graduate students to virtual guests through asynchronous discussions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 5(2): 53–63, 2001.
Meyer, K. Face to face versus threaded discussions: The role of time and higher order thinking. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 7(3): 55–65, 2003.
Morse, K. Does one size fit all? Exploring asynchronous learning in a multicultural environment. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 7(1): 37–56, 2003.
Oliver, M. and G. Shaw. Asynchronous discussion in support of medical education. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 7(1): 56–67, 2003.
Parker, D. and A. Gemino. Inside on-line learning comparing conceptual and technique learning performance in place-based and ALN formats. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 5(2): 64–92, 2001.
Picciano, A. Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 6(1): 21–40, 2002.
Ross, S., A. Kukulska-Hulme, H. Chappel and H. Joyce. Taking e-moderating skills to the next level: Reflecting on the design of conferencing environments. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 8(2): 115–137, 2004.
Shaw, G. and W. Pieter. The use of asynchronous learning networks in nutrition education: Student attitude, experiences and performance. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 4(1): 40–51, 2000.
Spiceland, D. and C. Hawkins. The impact on learning of an asynchronous active learning course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 6(1): 68–75, 2002.
Vandergrift, K. The anatomy of a distance education course: A case study analysis. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 6(1): 76–90, 2002.
Yang, H. and J. Tang. Effects of social network on students’ performance: A Web-based forum study in Taiwan. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 7(3): 93–107, 2003.
Angeli, C., N. Valanides, and C. Bonk. Communication in a Web-based conferencing system: The quality of computer-mediated interactions. British Journal of Educational Technology 34(1): 31–43, 2003.
Carswell, L., P. Thomas, M. Petre, B. Price and M. Richards. Distance education via the Internet: The student experience. British Journal of Educational Technology 31(1): 29–46, 2000.
Collings, P. and J. Pearce. Sharing designer and user perspectives of web site evaluation: A cross-campus collaborative learning experience. British Journal of Educational Technology 33(3): 267–278, 2002.
Cunningham-Atkins, H., N. Powell, D. Moore, D. Hobbs and S. Sharpe. The role of cognitive style in educational computer conferencing. British Journal of Educational Technology 35(1): 69–80, 2004.
Lindblom-Ylänne, S. and H. Pihlajamäki. Can a collaborative network environment enhance essay-writing processes? British Journal of Educational Technology 34(1): 17–30, 2003.
Macdonald, J. and P. Twining. Assessing activity-based learning for a networked course. British Journal of Educational Technology 33(5): 603–618, 2002.
Murphy, E. Recognising and promoting collaboration in an online asynchronous discussion. British Journal of Educational Technology 35(4): 421–431, 2004.
Salmon, G. Mirror, mirror, on my screen: Exploring online reflections. British Journal of Educational Technology 33(4): 379–391, 2002.
Wearmouth J., A.P. Smith and J. Soler. Computer conferencing with access to a ‘guest expert’ in the professional development of special educational needs coordinators. British Journal of Educational Technology 35(1): 81–93, 2004.
Hubscher-Younger, T. and N. Narayanan. Authority and convergence in collaborative learning. Computers and Education 41(4): 313–334, 2003.
Johnson, S., C. Suriya, S. Won Yoon, J. Berrett and J. La Fleur. Team development and group processes of virtual learning teams. Computers and Education 39(4): 379–393, 2002.
Kear, K. Following the thread in computer conferences. Computers and Education 37(1): 81–99, 2001.
Light, P., E. Nesbitt, V. Light and S. White. Variety is the spice of life: Student use of CMC in the context of campus-based study. Computers and Education 34(3–4): 257–267, 2000.
MacDonald, J. Assessing online collaborative learning: Process and product. Computers and Education 40(4): 377–391, 2003.
Martínez, A., Y. Dimitriadis, B. Rubia, E. Gómez and P. de la Fuente. Combining qualitative evaluation and social network analysis for the study of classroom social interactions. Computers and Education 41(4): 355–368, 2003.
Mazzolini, M. and S. Maddison. Sage, guide or ghost? The effect of instructor intervention on student participation in online discussion forums. Computers and Education 40(3): 237–253, 2003.
Tolmie, A. and J. Boyle. Factors influencing the success of computer-mediated communication (CMC) environments in university teaching: A review and a case study. Computers and Education 34(2): 119–140, 2000.
Wilson, E. Student characteristics and computer-mediated communication. Computers and Education 34(2): 67–76, 2000.
Putz, P. and P. Arnold. Communities of practice: Guidelines for the design of online seminars in higher education. Education, Communication and Information 1(2): 181–195, 2001.
Swan, K. Building learning communities in online courses: The importance of interaction. Education, Communication and Information 2(1): 23–49, 2002.
De Abreu Moreira, D. and E. Quintino Da Silva. A method to increase student interaction using student groups and peer review over the Internet. Education and Information Technologies 8(1): 47–54, 2003.
Hawkey, K. Asynchronous text-based discussion: A case study with trainee teachers. Education and Information Technologies 8(2): 165-177, 2003.
Hawkey, K. Assessing online discussions working along the grain of current technology and educational culture. Education and Information Technologies 9(4): 377–386, 2004.
Lockhorst, D., W. Admiraal, A. Pilot and W. Veen. Design elements for a CSCL environment in a teacher training programme. Education and Information Technologies 7(4): 377–384, 2002.
White, B. and R. Le Cornu. Email reducing stress for student teachers. Education and Information Technologies 7(4): 351–357, 2002.
Chen, G., C. Wang and K. Ou. Using group communication to monitor Web-based group learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 19(4): 401–415, 2003.
Jones, C. and M. Asensio. Experiences of assessment Using phenomenography for evaluation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 17(3): 306–313, 2001.
De Laat, M. and V. Lally. It’s not so easy: Researching the complexity of emergent participant roles and awareness in asynchronous networked learning discussions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 20(3): 165–171, 2004.
Ritchie, G. and S. Peters. Using narratives in conferences to improve the CMC learning environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 17(4): 376–385, 2001.
Thomas, M.J.W. Learning within incoherent structures: The space of online discussion forums. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 18(3): 351–366, 2002.
Weller, M. Implementing a CMC tutor group for an existing distance education course. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 16(3):178–183, 2000.
Åhlberg, M., A. Kaasinen, T. Kaivola and L. Houtsonen. Collaborative knowledge building to promote in-service teacher training in environmental education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education 10(3): 227–238, 2001.
Brett, C. Off-line factors contributing to online engagement. Technology, Pedagogy and Education 13(1): 83–95, 2004.
Clarke, L. Putting the ‘C’ in ICT: Using computer conferencing to foster a community of practice among student teachers. Technology, Pedagogy and Education 11(2): 143–162, 2002.
Cook, D. and J. Ralston. Sharpening the focus: Methodological issues in analyzing online conferences. Technology, Pedagogy and Education 12(3): 361–376, 2003.
Galanouli, D. and J. Collins. Using unmediated computer conferencing to promote reflective practice and confidence-building in initial teacher education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education 9(2): 237–254, 2000.
Mackinnon, G. Inter-rater reliability of an electronic discussion coding system. Technology, Pedagogy and Education 12(2): 219–230, 2003.
Maor, D. Teacher’s and students’ perspectives on on-line learning in a social constructivist learning environment. Technology, Pedagogy and Education 12(2): 201–217, 2003.
Miller, D. and J. Ewing. Beyond knowledge transmission? Computer-supported learning in teacher education: Some benefits in terms of stress, control and self-belief. Technology, Pedagogy and Education 9(3): 363–376, 2000.
Seabrooks, J., S. Kenney and M. LaMontagne. Collaboration and virtual mentoring: Building relationships between pre-service and in-service special education teachers. Technology, Pedagogy and Education 9(2): 219–236, 2000.
Tsui, A. and W. Ki. Teacher participation in computer conferencing: Socio-psychological dimensions. Technology, Pedagogy and Education 11(1): 7–22, 2002.
Hiltz, R., N. Coppola, N. Rotter, M. Turoff and R. Benbunan-Fich. Measuring the importance of collaborative learning for the effectiveness of ALN. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 4(2):103–125, 2000.
Vygotsky, L. Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.
Laurillard, D. Rethinking University Teaching: A Framework for the Effective Use of Educational Technology. London: Routledge, 1993.
Johnson, D. and R. Johnson. Learning Together and Alone: Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Learning. London: Prentice-Hall, 1987.
Lave, J. and E. Wenger. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions
