ON THE NATURE AND DEVELOPMENT OF SOCIAL PRESENCE IN ONLINE COURSE DISCUSSIONS

Karen Swan, Li Fang Shih

Abstract


“Social presence,” the degree to which participants in computer-mediated communication feel affectively connected one to another, has been shown to be an important factor in student satisfaction and success in online courses. This mixed methods study built on previous research to explore in greater depth the nature of social presence and how it develops in online course discussions. The study combined quantitative analyses of survey results from students enrolled in four online graduate courses, and qualitative comparisons of students with the highest and lowest perceptions of social presence. Quantitative results revealed significant correlations between perceived social presence and satisfaction with online discussions, and teased apart the respective influences of the perceived presence of instructors and peers. The findings indicate that the perceived presence of instructors may be a more influential factor in determining student satisfaction than the perceived presence of peers. Correlations with other course and learner characteristics suggest that course design may also significantly affect the development of social presence. Qualitative findings support the quantitative results. In addition, they provide evidence that students perceiving the highest social presence also projected themselves more into online discussions,
and reveal meaningful differences in perceptions of the usefulness and purpose of online discussion between students perceiving high and low social presence.


Keywords


Asynchronous Discussion,Social Presence,Online Learning,Interaction,Threaded Discussion,Computer-mediated Communication,Community

Full Text:

PDF

References


Haythornthwaite, C. Building social networks via computer networks: Creating and sustaining distributed learning communities. In K. Renninger, & W. Shumar (eds.) Building Virtual Communities: Learning and Change in Cyberspace. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.

Vygotsky, L. S. Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.

Lave, J. and E. Wenger, E. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.

Richmond, V. P., J. S. Gorham, and J. McCrosky. The relationship between selected immediacy behaviors and cognitive learning. In M. McLaughlin (ed.) Communication Yearbook 10, 574–590. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1987.

Weiner, M. & A. Mehrabian. Language Within Language: Immediacy, a Channel in Verbal Communication. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1968.

Christophel, D. The relationship among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Education 39(4): 323–240, 1990.

Rodriguez, J. L., T. G. Plax, and P. Kearney. Clarifying the relationship between teacher nonverbal immediacy and student cognitive learning: affective learning as the central causal mediator. Communication Education 45: 293–305, 1996.

Short, J., E. Williams, E and B. Christie. The Social Psychology of Telecommunications, 65. Toronto: Wiley, 1976.

Rice, R. E. Contexts of research in organizational computer-mediated communication. In M. Lea (ed.), Contexts of Computer-Mediated Communication. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1992.

Picard, R. W. Affective Computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997.

Harasim, L. On-line Education: Perspectives on a New Environment. New York: Praeger, 1990.

Levin, J. A., H. Kim, and M. M. Riel. Analyzing instructional interactions on electronic message networks. In L. Harasim (ed.), On-line Education: Perspectives on a New Environment New York: Praeger, 1990.

Hiltz, S. R. The Virtual Classroom: Learning without Limits via Computer Networks. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 1994.

Poole, D. M. Student participation in a discussion-oriented online course: a case study. Journal of Research on Computing in Education 33(2): 162–177, 2000.

Garrison, D. R. Cognitive presence for effective asynchronous online learning: the role of reflective inquiry, self-direction and metacognition. In J. Bourne & J. C. Moore (eds.), Elements of Quality Online Education: Practice and Direction, 47–58. Needham, MA: Sloan-C, 2003.

Walther, J. Interpersonal effects in computer mediated interaction. Communication Research 21(4): 460–487, 1994.

Gunawardena, C. Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferences. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications 1(2/3): 147–166, 1995.

Rourke, L., T. Anderson, D. R. Garrison, and W. Archer. Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education 14(2): 50, 2001.

Swan, K. Building communities in online courses: the importance of interaction. Education, Communication and Information 2(1): 23–49, 2002.

Gunawardena, C. and F. Zittle. Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer mediated conferencing environment. American Journal of Distance Education 11(3): 8–26, 1997.

Richardson, J. C. and K. Swan. Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students' perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 7(1): 68–88, 2003.

Tu, C. H. On-line learning migration: From social learning theory to social presence theory in CMC environment. Journal of Network and Computer Applications 23(1): 27–37, 2000.

Picciano, A. G. Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence and performance in an online course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 6(1): 24, 2002.

Wegerif, R. The social dimension of asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 2(1): 34–49, 1998.

Byam, N. The emergence of community in computer-mediated communication. In S. G. Jones (ed.) Cybersociety. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1995.

Danchak, M. M., J. B. Walther, and K. Swan. Presence in mediated instruction: bandwidth, behavior, and expectancy violations. Orlando, FL: Paper presented at the Seventh Annual Sloan-C International Conference on Online Learning, 2001.

Argyle, M. and M. Cook. Gaze and Mutual Gaze. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976.

Swan, K. Developing social presence in online discussions. In S. Naidu (ed), Learning and Teaching with Technology: Principles and Practices, 147–164. London: Kogan Page, 2003.

Tu, C-H. and M. McIsaac. The relationship of social presence and interaction in online classes. The American Journal of Distance Education 16(3): 131–150, 2002.

Gunawardena, C., C. A. Lowe, and T. Anderson. Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conference. Journal of Educational Computing Research 17(4): 397–431, 1997.

Anderson, T., L. Rourke, D. R. Garrison, and W. Archer. Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 5(2): 2001.

Shea, P. J., A. M. Pickett and W. E. Pelz. A follow-up investigation of “teaching presence” in the SUNY Learning Network. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 7(2): 61–80, 2003.

Vandergrift, K. E. The anatomy of a distance education course: a case study analysis. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 6(1): 76–90, 2002.

Prensky, M. Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, NCB University Press 9(1): 2001.

Swan, K., P. Shea, E. Fredericksen, A. Pickett, W. Pelz, and G. Maher. Building knowledge building communities: consistency, contact and communication in the virtual classroom. Journal of Educational Computing Research 23(4): 389–413, 2000.

Wenger, E. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997.

Pelz, B. (My) Three principles of effective online pedagogy. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 8(3): 33–46, 2004.

Ehlers, U-D. Quality in e-learning from a learner’s perspective. European Journal of Open and Distance Learning, 2004-I, 2004. Online: http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2004/Online_Master_COPs.html

Garrison, D. R., M. Cleveland-Innes, and T. Fung. Student role adjustment in online communities of inquiry: model and instrument validation. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 8(2): 61–74, 2004.

Polhemus, L., M. Danchak, A. Assis, and K. Swan. A cyclic approach to online course design. Paper presented at the Tenth Annual Sloan-C International Conference on Asynchronous Learning Networks, Orlando, FL, November, 2004.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v9i3.1788



Copyright (c) 2019 Karen Swan, Li Fang Shih