GENDER AND ONLINE DISCOURSE IN THE PRINCIPLES OF ECONOMICS

Authors

  • Duane B. Graddy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v8i4.1806

Keywords:

Collaborative learning, learning effectiveness, computer-mediated communications, gender differences, distance learning

Abstract

Collaboration is the heart of online learning. Interaction among course participants brings excitement to the online environment and creates knowledge as a group activity. Impediments to active collaboration reduce group, as well as individual, potentialities. Past studies of online discussions have found differences in the style of female and male conversations that could impede the learning process. The conversational styles of female and male students in two online principles of economics classes were analyzed in the present study. The null hypothesis posited no difference in the styles of online discourse between female and male students. The null hypothesis was rejected, implying gender differences in
conversational styles. The tone of male postings was more optimistic than the tone of female postings. Female conversations used words revealing social isolation and the rejection of social norms. The paper also discussed the issue of the male X-factor in the principles of economics from a sociolinguistic perspective.

References

Coates, D. and Humphrey, B. Evaluation of Computer-assisted Instruction in Principles of Economics. Educational Technology & Society 4 (2): 1–16, 2001.

Manning, L. Economics on the Internet: Electronic Mail in the Classroom. Journal of Economic Education 27: 201–205, 1996.

Navarro, P. and Shoemaker, J. Economics in the Cyberspace: A Comparison Study.

Burkett, R. The Biological Basis for Gender-based Difference in Web-based “Discussion” and Assessment. Paper presented at the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science, Costa Mesa, CA, 2001.

Carli, L. Gender Differences in Interaction Style and Influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56 (4): 565–576, 1989.

Fahy, P. Use of Linguistic Qualifiers and Intensifiers in Computer Conferences. The American Journal of Distance Education 16 (1): 5–22, 2002.

Herring, S. Gender and Democracy in Computer-mediated Communication. Electronic Journal of Communication 3 (2): 1–16, 1993.

Herring, S. Gender Differences in Computer-mediated Communication: Bringing Familiar Baggage to the New Frontier. Paper presented at the American Library Association Annual Convention, Miami Florida, 1994.

Herring, S. Gender Differences in CMC: Findings and Implications. The CPSR Newsletter 18 (1): 1–12, 2000.

Herring, S. Gender and Power in Online Communications. CSI Working Paper (#WP-01-05). Center for Social Informatics, Indiana University - Bloomington, 2001.

Rossetti, P. Gender Differences in E-mail Communications. The Internet TESL Journal 4 (7): 1–6, 1998.

Savicki, V., Lingenfelter, D. and Kelley M. Gender Language Style and Group Composition in Internet Discussion Groups. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2 (3): 1–12, 1996.

Selfe, C. and Meyer P. Testing Claims for Online Conferences. Written Communications 8 (2): 163–192, 1991.

Siegfried, J. and Fels, R. Research on Teaching College Economics: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature 17 (3): 923–969, 1979.

Robb, R. and Robb, A. Gender and the Study of Economics: The Role of the Instructor. Journal of Economic Education 30: 3–19, 1999.

Greene, B. Verbal Abilities, Gender, and the Introductory Economics Course: A New Look at Old Assumptions. Journal of Economic Education 28: 13–30, 1997.

Zhu, E. Meaning, Negotiation, Knowledge Construction, and Mentoring in Distance Learning Courses. Proceedings of Selected Research and Development Presentations at the 1996 National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, ERIC documents: ED397849.

Singh, S. A Pilot Study on Gender Differences in Conversational Speech on Lexical Richness Measures. Literary and Linguistic Computing 16 (3): 251–264, 2001.

Tannen, D. You Just Don't Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. New York: William Morrow and Co., Inc, 1990.

Hart, R. Diction 5.0 (Version 5.0.01), 1999.

Anderson, G., Benjamin, D. and Fuss, M. The Determinants of Success in University Introductory Economics Courses. Journal of Economic Education 25 (2): 99–119, 1994.

Ellis, L., Durden, G. and Gaynor, P. Evidence on Factors That Influence the Probability of a Good Performance in the Principles of Economics, 1998. Retrieved September 6, 2003 from http://www.westga.edu/~bquest/1998/perform.html.

Greenlaws, S. and DeLoach, B. Critical thinking and Electronic Discussion. Journal of Economic Education 34 (1): 36–52, 2003.

Jensen, E. and A. Owen. Pedagogy, Student Gender, and Interest in Economics, 1996. Retrieved April 15, 2003 from http://www.hamilton.edu/acdemics/Econ/workpap/99_10pdf.

Lumsden, K. and Scott, A. The Economics Student Reexamined: Male-Female Differences in Comprehension. Journal of Economic Education 18 (4): 365–375, 1987.

Crowley, R. and Wilton, D. An Analysis of “Learning” in Introductory Economics. Canadian Journal of Economics 7 (4): 665–673, 1974.

Hart, R. Verbal Style and the Presidency: A Computer-Based Analysis. New York: Academic Press, 1984.

Peng, C., Lee, K. and Ingersoll, G. An Introduction to Logistic Regression Analysis and Reporting. The Journal of Educational Research 96 (1): 3–14, 2002.

McAllister, C and Ting, E. Analysis of Discussion Items by Males and Females in Online College Courses. Paper presented at the American Education Research Association, Seattle, WA, 2001.

Durr, C. Factors Affecting Student Performance in Principles of Macroeconomics Courses, 1999. Retrieved September 6, 2003 from http://www.elon.edu/ipe/durr.pdf.

Heath, J. An Econometric Model of the Role of Gender in Economics Education. American Economic Association Papers and Proceedings, 226–230, 1989.

Myatt, A. and Waddell, C. Effectiveness of Teaching and Learning in Economics in High School. Journal of Economic Education 21: 355–363, 1990.

May, A. The Feminist Challenge to Economics. Challenge 45 (6): 1–19, 2002.

Johnstone, B. Community and Contests: How Men and Women Construct Worlds in Conversational Narratives. Paper presented at Women in America: Legacies of Race and Ethnicity, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, 1989.

Richardson, J. and Swan, K. Examining Social Presence in Online Courses in Relation to Students’ Perceived Learning and Satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 7 (1): 2003.

Tu, C. The impact of Text-based CMC on Online Social Presence. The Journal of Interactive Online Learning 1 (2): 1–24, 2002.

Downloads

Published

2019-03-19

Issue

Section

Empirical Studies