SCAFFOLDING COMPLEX TASKS BY OPEN ONLINE SUBMISSION: EMERGING PATTERNS AND PROFILES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v8i4.1809Keywords:
Peer Examples, Open Online Task Submission, Scaffolding, Asynchronous NetworkingAbstract
Students in higher-education courses are often confronted with complex tasks that require application and integration of newly gained knowledge. Different students require different types and amounts of instructional scaffolding for coping with such challenging tasks. The incorporation of asynchronous online elements into academic courses offers various ways of implementing traditional instructional scaffolding methods, as well as the ability to incorporate new strategies made feasible by this medium.
This paper presents and discusses the potential and challenges of using open online submission of assignments via asynchronous networking as a strategy for providing differential scaffolding in the preparation of complex tasks (not as an alternative model for online peer collaboration).
A pilot study, performed with five graduate education courses, showed that open online submission of assignments led to spontaneous, informal peer-evaluation, enabling students to learn from peer examples. The detailed analysis of students’ activity and their reflections has revealed four typical learner profiles
with respect to open assignment submission, self-evaluation and characteristic benefit from peer work.
References
Perkins, D. The many faces of constructivism. Educational Leadership 57(3): 6–11, 1999.
Althauser, R. & Matuga, J. M. On the pedagogy of electronic instruction. In C. J. Bonk and K. S. King (Eds.), Electronic Collaborators: Learner-centered Technologies for Literacy, Apprenticeship and Discourse. Mahawah, NJ: LEA Associates, 1998.
Kahn, T. M. A learning agenda: Putting people first. Palo Alto, CA: Institute for Research on Learning, 1993.
Vygotsky, L. S. Mind in Society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.
Shimoda, T. A., White, B. Y. & Fredriksen, J. R. Student goal orientation in learning inquiry skills with modifiable software advisors, Science Education, 86: 244–263, 2002.
Kolodner, J. L. and Nagel, K. The Design Discussion Area: A Collaboration Learning Tool in Support of Learning from Problem-Solving and Design Activities, Proceedings of CSCL 99. Palo Alto, CA, 300–307, 1999.
Brusilovsky, P. WebEx: Learning from examples in a programming course. In W. Fowler and J. Hasebrook (Eds.), Proc. of WebNet'2001, World Conference of the WWW and Internet, Orlando, FL, AACE (2001), 124–129. Available online: http://www2.sos.pitt.edu/~peterb/papers/WevNet01.html.
Atkinson, R. K., Derry, S. J., Renkl, A. & Wortham, D. Learning from examples: Instructional principles from the worked examples research. Review of Educational Research 70: 181–214, 2000.
Chi, M. T. H. & Bassok, M. Learning from examples via self-explanations. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, Learning and Instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser, 251–282. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1989.
Topping, K. Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities, Review of Educational Research 68(3): 249–276, 1998.
Blumhof, J. & Stallibrass, C. Peer Assessment. Hatfield, UK: University of Hertfordshire Press, 1994.
Zariski, A. Student peer assessment in tertiary education: Promise, perils and practice. In: J. Abbott and L. Willcoxson (Eds.), Teaching and Learning Within and Across Disciplines, 189–200. Proceedings of the 5th Annual Teaching Learning Forum, Murdoch University, February, 1996. Online. Available online: http://cea.curtin.edu.au/tlf/tlf1996/zariski.htm.
Althauser, R. & Darnall, K. Enhancing Critical Reading and Writing through Peer Reviews: An Exploration of Assisted Performance, Teaching Sociology 29(1): 23–35, 2001.
Dominick, P. G., Reilly, R. R. & McGourty, J. The effects of peer feedback on team member behavior. Group and Organization Management 22: 508–520, 1997.
Sternberg, R. J. Thinking Styles. Cambridge University Press, New York, 1994.
Sternberg, R. J. Allowing for Thinking Styles. Educational Leadership 52(3): 1994. Available online: http://www.ascd.org/readingroom/edlead/9411/sternberg.html.
Bereiter, C. & Scardamalia, M. Intentional learning as a goal of instruction. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, Learning and Instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser, 361–392. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1989.
Shimoda, T. A., White, B. W., & Fredriksen, J. R. Student goal orientation in learning inquiry skills with modifiable software advisors. Science Education 86: 244–263, 2002.
Ng, E. & Bereiter, C. Three levels of goal orientation in learning. In A. Ram and D. B. Leake (Eds.), Goal-driven learning, 355–380. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1994.
HighLearn - Britannica Knowledge Systems. Available online: http://www.britannica-ks.com.
Tuckman, B. W. Academic Procrastinators: Their Rationalizations and Web-Course Performance. APA Symposium Paper, Chicago, 2002.
Wesley, J. Effects of ability, high school achievement and procrastinatory behavior on college performance. Educational and Psychological Measurement 54: 404–408, 1994.
Beck, B. L., Koons, S. R. & Milgram, D. L. Correlates and consequences of behavioral procrastination: The effects of academic procrastination, self-consciousness, self-esteem, and selfhandicapping. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality 15: 3–13, 2000.
Steel, P., Brothen, T. & Wambach, C. Procrastination and personality, performance and mood. Personality and Individual Differences 30: 95–106, 2001.
Baker, J. & Dillon, G. Peer Support on the Web. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 36(1): 65–70, 1999.
Kang, I. The use of computer mediated communication: Electronic Collaboration and Interactivity. In: C. J. Bonk and K. S. King (Eds.), Electronic Collaborators: Learner-centered Technologies for Literacy, Apprenticeship and Discourse. Mahawah, NJ: LEA Associates, 1998.
Meyer, K. A. Face-to face versus threaded discussions: the role of the time and higher order thinking. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 7(3): 55–65, 2003.
Sengupta, S. Exchanging ideas with peers in network-based classrooms: An aid or a pain? Language Learning and Technology 5(1): 103–134, 2001.
Ferrari, J. R., Keane, S. M., Wolfe, R. N. & Beck, B. L. The Antecedents and Consequences of Academic Excuse-making. Research in Higher Education 39(2): 199–215, 1998.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions
