David DiBiase


Detailed daily records of instructor effort in an established asynchronous online course over a three and one-half year period are analyzed. Student satisfaction data acquired from course evaluation surveys over the same period are also examined. In response to a three-fold increase in enrollment over the period, instructors realized a twelve percent gain in efficiency. Contrary to expectations, a modest economy of scale was achieved with no discernible decrease in student satisfaction.


Faculty Workload,Efficiency,Scalability,Student Satisfaction,Asynchronous Online Course,Distance Education

Full Text:



National Education Association. A Survey of Traditional and Distance Learning Higher Education Members, 2000. Accessed 19 May 2002:

SchWeber, C., Kelly, K. B., and Orr, G. J. Training, and Retaining, Faculty for Online Courses: Challenges and Strategies. Distance Learning '98. Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning, pp. 347-352. Madison WI, August 5–7, 1998.

Palloff, R. M. and Pratt, K. Building Learning Communities in Cyberspace: Effective Strategies for the Online Classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1999.

Rockwell, S. K., Schauer, J., Fritz, S. M. and Marx, D. B. Incentives and Obstacles Influencing Higher Education Faculty and Administrators to Teach via Distance. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration 2(4): Winter 1999. Accessed 19 May 2002:

Wolcott, L. L. and Betts, K. S. What’s In It for Me? Incentives for Faculty Participation in Distance Education. Journal of Distance Education 14(2): 34–49, 1999.

Ellis, E.E. Faculty Participation in the Pennsylvania State University World Campus: Identifying Barriers to Success. Open Learning 15(3): 2000.

Johnston, T. C., Alexander, L., and Fieser, J. Compensation Models for Online/Distance Education. Proceedings of the Mid-South Instructional Technology Conference, April 9-11 2000.

Johnston, T., Alexander, L. Conrad, C. and Fieser, J. Faculty Compensation Models for Online/Distance Education. Panel discussion at the April 2000 Mid-south Instructional Technology Conference: Extending the Frontiers of Teaching and Learning.

Weiner, R. S. Instructors Say Online Courses Involve More Work at Same Pay. New York Times on the Web, June 21, 2000. Accessed 27 May 2002:

Berge, Z. L. The Context of Distance Training: Predicting Change. In Z.L. Berge (Ed.) Sustaining Distance Training: Integrating Learning Technologies into the Fabric of the Enterprise, 3-12. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2000.

DiBiase, D. Is Distance Teaching More Work or Less Work? American Journal of Distance Education 14(3):6–20, 2000.

Visser, J. A. Faculty Work in Developing and Teaching Web-based Distance Courses: A Case Study of Time and Effort. American Journal of Distance Education 14(3): 21–32, 2000.

Hislop, G. W. Does Teaching Online Take More Time? Proceedings of the 31st ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, pp. T1F-23-27, 2001. Accessed 20 June 2002:

Glicksohn, J. Temporal Cognition and the Phenomenology of Time: a Multiplicative Function for Apparent Duration. Consciousness and Cognition 10(1): 1–25, 2001.

Schifter, C. C. Faculty Motivators and Inhibitors for Participation in Distance Education. Educational Technology XL(2): 43–46, 2000.

University of Illinois Faculty Seminar. Teaching at an Internet Distance: the Pedagogy of Online Teaching and Learning, 1999. Accessed 19 May 2002:

Twigg, C. A. Can Online Education Scale? The Learning Marketspace, April, 2003. Accessed 30 April 2003:

DiBiase, D. and Rademacher, H. Scaling Up: Faculty Workload, Class Size, and Student Satisfaction in a Distance Learning Course on Geographic Information Science. Forthcoming in Journal of Geography in Higher Education.

Lorenzo, G. and Moore, J. The Sloan Consortium Report to the Nation: Five Pillars of Quality Online Education. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, 2002. Accessed 8 August 2003:

Bransford, J. D. and others (Eds). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School. Washington DC: National Research Council, 2000.

National Survey of Student Engagement, 2003. Accessed 31 March 2003:

Twigg, C. A. It’s Not How Fast You Run. The Learning Marketspace, March, 2002. Accessed 31 March 2003:

DiBiase, D. and colleagues. Using e-Portfolios at Penn State to Enhance Student Learning: Status, Prospects, and Strategies, February 2002. Accessed 3 January 2004:

Yancey, K. B. General Patterns and the Future. In B. Cambridge and others (Eds), Electronic Portfolios: Emerging Practices in Student, Faculty, and Institutional Learning, 83-87. Washington, DC: American Association of Higher Education, 2001.

Linn, R. L. and Gronlund, N. E. Chapter 12: Portfolios. In Measurement and Assessment in Teaching, 8th Ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2000.

Outreach Office of Marketing Research and Planning. World Campus GIS Certificate Graduates Survey Report. July 2002. The Pennsylvania State University, Outreach and Cooperative Extension.

DiBiase, D. Is Distance Education a Faustian Bargain? Journal of Geography in Higher Education 24(1): 130-135, 2000.

Outreach Office of Marketing Research and Planning. World Campus Student Surveys—Demographics Survey—Longitudinal Study. The Pennsylvania State University, Outreach and Cooperative Extension. March, 2003.

Dorris, M. J. An Analysis of the Penn State Student Rating of Teaching Effectiveness, Report to the Penn State University Faculty Senate, 1997. Accessed 19 May 2002:

Blalock, H. M. Social Statistics, 2nd Ed. New York: McGraw-Hill. 1979.

Ragan, L. C. and Terheggen, S. L. Effective Workload Management Strategies for the Online Environment. The Pennsylvania State University World Campus, 2003. Accessed 4 January 2004:


Copyright (c) 2019 David DiBiase