TAKING E-MODERATING SKILLS TO THE NEXT LEVEL: REFLECTING ON THE DESIGN OF CONFERENCING ENVIRONMENTS

Shelagh M. Ross, Agnes Kukulska-Hulme, Helen Chappel, Brian Joyce

Abstract


This paper reports an analysis of computer conference structures set up for a distance education course in which major components of the teaching and learning involve group discussions and collaboration via asynchronous text-based conferencing. As well as adopting traditional e-moderator roles, tutors were required to design appropriate online spaces and navigation routes for students. Tutors’ views concerning conference structures focussed on tensions between enabling easy access to conference areas, facilitating the successful running of activities, and addressing students’ subsequent needs for retrieval of conference material for assessment tasks. The geographically dispersed course tutors initially explored these issues in reflective online conversations. Comparisons were made between structures that were set up differently but all used for essentially the same tasks and purposes. Evidence from conference messages, from student feedback given in questionnaire and interview responses, as well as from students’ written assignments, provided insights into the impact such structures may have on the student learning experience. Students found conference areas for their own group easy to navigate, but they had concerns about managing the large number of messages; these concerns centred on the volume, threading, linking, length, and language of messages.


Keywords


Networked Learning Environments,Collaborative Learning,Online Tutoring,Virtual Spaces,Message Threading,Reflective Practice

Full Text:

PDF

References


Thorpe, M. Rethinking Learner Support, the Challenge of Collaborative Online Learning. Open Learning 17(2): 105–119, 2002.

Tait, A. Student Support in Open and Distance Learning. In: Lockwood, F. (Ed.), Open and Distance Learning Today. London: Routledge, 1995.

Jones, C. Evaluating a Collaborative Online Learning Environment. Active Learning 9: 31–35, 1998.

Noakes, N. Collaboration and Community Constituents: An Investigation into the Key Elements that Build, Nurture and Sustain a Collaborative Learning Community in Networked Spaces. Online Paper, Fourth Annual TCC Online Conference: Best Practices in Delivering, Supporting, and Managing Online Learning, 1999. Available online:http://leahi.kcc.hawaii.edu/org/tcon99/papers/noakes.html.

McKenzie, W. and Murphy, D. “I hope this goes somewhere”: Evaluation of an Online Discussion Group. Australian Journal of Educational Technology 16(3): 239–257, 2000. Available online: http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet16/mckenzie.html.

Curtis, D. D. and Lawson, M. J. Exploring Collaborative Online Learning. JALN 5(1): 2001. Available online: http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v5n1/v5n1_curtis.asp.

Salmon, G. E-Moderating, the Key to Teaching and Learning Online. London: Kogan Page, 2000.

Cox, S., Clark, W.P., Heath, H. and Plumpton, B. Key Facilitation Skills for Effective Online Discussion Groups: Herding Cats through Piccadilly Circus. Paper presented at Competition, Collaboration, Continuity, Change: Distance Education—An Open Question? University of South Australia, Adelaide, 11–13 September 2000. Available online:

http://www.com.unisa.edu.au/cccc/papers/refereed/paper11/Paper11-1.htm.

Goodyear, P. Environments for Lifelong Learning, 2000. Available online: http://soeweb.syr.edu/Faculty/Spector/courses/Ide-714/Notes/goodyear-28Jul00.pdf.

Goodyear, P. Psychological Foundations for Networked Learning. In C. Steeples and C. Jones (eds.), Networked Learning: Perspectives and Issues. London: Springer, 2002.

Cicognani, A. Architectural Design for Online Environments. In B. Kolko, Virtual Commons: Policy and Community in an Electronic Age. New York: Columbia University Press, 2002.

Putz, P., Arnold, P. Communities of Practice: Guidelines for the Design of Online Seminars in Higher Education. Education, Communication & Information 1(2): 2001.

McKenree, J., and Mayes, J.T. “The Vicarious Learner”: Investigating the Benefits of Observing Peer Dialogues, 1997. Available online: http://www.media.uwe.ac.uk/masoud/cal-97/papers/mckenre.html.

Hewitt, J. Beyond Threaded Discourse. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications 7(3): 207–221, 2001. Available online: http://www.aace.org/dl/index.cfm/fuseaction/View/paperID/6473.

Kear, K. Following the Thread in Computer Conferences. Computers and Education 37: 81–99, 2001.

Goodyear, P. Pedagogical Frameworks and Action Research in Open and Distance Learning, Ref 99041: 1999. Available online: http://domino.lancs.ac.uk/edres/csaltdocs.nsf.

Foley, G. & Schuck, S. Web-Based Conferencing: Pedagogical Asset or Constraint? Australian Journal of Educational Technology 14(2): 121–140, 1998. Available online: http://www.cleo.murdoch.edu.au/ajet/ajet14/foley.html.

Bonk, C. J., Malinowski, S., Angeli, C. & East, J. Web-Based Conferencing for Pre-Service Teacher Education: Electronic Discourse From the Field. Journal of Educational Computing Research 19(3): 269–306, 1998.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v8i2.1831



Copyright (c) 2019 Shelagh M. Ross, Agnes Kukulska-Hulme, Helen Chappel, Brian Joyce