ACADEMIC REDESIGN: ACCOMPLISHING MORE WITH LESS

Authors

  • William H. Graves

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v8i1.1836

Keywords:

Academic Redesign, Course Redesign, Community Colleges, Technology, Flex Markets, Flex Programs

Abstract

Community colleges are under persistent pressure to spend more on technology. In lieu of bolting technology onto essential academic and administrative process at additional net cost, savvy community college leaders are planning and implementing academic service redesign strategies to achieve measurable outcomes constituting gains in academic productivity. This paper presents case studies of four higher education institutions that contracted with Collegis for a range of planning, marketing, student recruiting, academic, and technology management and support services. To be able to accomplish more with less, three strategies are discussed: (1) redesigning individual course sections to increase learning and convenience, (2) redesigning common courses to decrease costs and increase learning outcomes, and (3) redesigning program delivery to participate in flex markets.

References

Jones, S. The Internet Goes to College: How Students Are Living in the Future. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Philadelphia: Pew Charitable Trusts, September 2002.

Burd, S. “Republican Leaders Stress Accountability and Cost Issues in Hearing on Higher Education Act,” Chronicle of Higher Education. Washington DC, May 14, 2003.

Callan, P. and others. Measuring Up 2002: The State-by-State Report Card for Higher Education. San Jose, CA: National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education, 2002.

Farrell, E. F. “A Common Yardstick?” Chronicle of Higher Education. Washington, DC, August 15, 2003.

Jones, D. State Shortfalls Predicted Throughout the Decade, Policy Alert. San Jose, CA: The National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education, February 2003.

Symonds, W. C. “Colleges in Crisis.” Special Report, Business Week. New York, April 28, 2003.

von Zastrow, C., Jones, R. T., and others. The Business Leader’s Guide to Measuring Up, 2002. Washington: The National Alliance of Business, February 2003.

Information about the Center for Academic Transformation and its Course Redesign Program funded by the Pew Charitable Trusts, including detailed case studies, can be found at http://www.center.rpi.edu/PewGrant.html.

Distance Education at Degree-Granting Postsecondary Institutions: 2000-2001. National Center for Education Statistics. http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2003017

Urdan, T. A., Weggen, C. C., and Moe, M. T. Two Years to Life: Investment Themes in For-Profit, Post-Secondary Education. Industry Report. San Francisco: ThinkEquity Partners, 2002.

Graves, W. H. New Educational Wealth as a Return on Investment in Technology, EDUCAUSE Review 37(4): July/August 2002. http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/erm0242.pdf.

Downloads

Published

2019-03-19

Issue

Section

Empirical Studies