FACE-TO-FACE VERSUS THREADED DISCUSSIONS: THE ROLE OF TIME AND HIGHER-ORDER THINKING

Katrina A. Meyer

Abstract


This study compares the experiences of students in face-to-face (in class) discussions with threaded discussions and also evaluates the threaded discussions for evidence of higher-order thinking. Students were enrolled in graduate-level classes that used both modes (face-to-face and online) for course-related discussions; their end-of-course evaluations of both experiences were grouped for analysis and themes constructed based on their comments. Themes included the “expansion of time,” “experience of time,” “quality of the discussion,” “needs of the student,” and “faculty expertise.” While there are advantages to holding discussions in either setting, students most frequently noted that using threaded discussions increased the amount of time they spent on class objectives and that they appreciated the extra time for reflection on course issues. The face-to-face format also had value as a result of its immediacy and energy, and some students found one mode a better “fit” with their preferred learning mode. The analysis
of higher-order thinking was based on a content analysis of the threaded discussions only. Each posting was coded as one of the four cognitive-processing categories described by Garrison and colleagues: 18% were triggering questions, 51% were exploration, 22% were integration, and 7% resolution. A fifth category – social – was appropriate for 3% of the responses and only 12% of the postings included a writing error. This framework provides some support for the assertion that higher-order thinking can and does occur in online discussions; strategies for increasing the number of responses in the integration and resolution categories are discussed.


Keywords


Online Learning,Evaluation,Content Analysis,Higher-Order Thinking

Full Text:

PDF

References


Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., and Archer, W. Critical Thinking, Cognitive Presence, and Computer Conferencing in Distance Education. The American Journal of Distance Education, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp 7-23, 2001.

Palloff, R. M., and Pratt, K. Building Learning Communities in Cyberspace. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1999.

Palloff, R. M., and Pratt, K. Lessons from the Cyberspace Classroom: Realities of Online Teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2001.

Weinberger, D. Small pieces loosely joined. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Publishing, 2002.

Lakoff, G., and Johnson, M. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.

Dutton, J., Dutton, M., and Perry, J. How Do Online Students Differ from Lecture Students? JALN, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2002. http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v6n1/index.asp

Gunawardena, C. N., and Zittle, F. J. (1997). Social Presence as a Predictor of Satisfaction within a Computer-Mediated Conferencing Environment. The American Journal of Distance Education, Vol. 11, No. 3, 1997.

Arbaugh, J. B. How Instructor Immediacy Behaviors Affect Student Satisfaction and Learning in Web-Based Courses, Business Communication Quarterly, Vol. 64, No. 4, pp 42-54, 2001. http://www.alnresearch.org/data_files/articles/full_text/arbaugh01.pdf

Klemm, W. R. Extending the Pedagogy of Threaded-Topic Discussions. The Technology Source, September/October. 2002. http://ts.mivu.org/default.asp?show=article&id=1015

Turoff, M., and Hiltz, S. R. Software Design and the Future of the Virtual Classroom. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, Vol. 4, 197-215, 1995.

Picciano, A. G. Beyond Student Perceptions: Issues of Interaction, Presence, and Performance in an Online Course. JALN, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2002. http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v6n1/v6n1_picciano.asp

Spiceland, J.D., and Hawkins, C. P. The Impact on Learning of an Asynchronous Course Format. JALN, Vol 6, No. 1, 2002.

Edelstein, S., and Edwards, J. If You Build It, They Will Come: Building Learning Communities through Threaded Discussions. The Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2002. http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/spring51/edelstein51.html

Curtis, D. D., and Lawson, M. J. Exploring Collaborative Online Learning, JALN, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp 21-34, 2001.

Paskey, J. A Survey Compares 2 Canadian MBA Programs, One Online and One Traditional. The Chronicle of Higher Education, April 26, 2001. http://chronicle.com/free/2001/04/2001042601u.htm

Newman, D. R., Webb, B., and Cochrane, C. A Content Analysis Method to Measure Critical Thinking in Face-to-Face and Computer Supported Group Learning, 1999. http://www.qub.ac.uk/mgt/papers/methods/contpap.html

Shapley, P. On-line Education to Develop Complex Reasoning Skills in Organic Chemistry. JALN, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2000. http://sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v4n2/v4n2_shapley.asp

Eklund, J., and Eklund, P. Integrating the Web and the Teaching of Technology: Cases across Two Universities, 1996. http://ausweb.scu.edu.au/aw96/educn/eklund2/paper.htm




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v7i3.1845