BEYOND STUDENT PERCEPTIONS: ISSUES OF INTERACTION, PRESENCE, AND PERFORMANCE IN AN ONLINE COURSE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v6i1.1870Keywords:
Distance Learning, Interaction, Presence, Social Presence, Learning Effectiveness, Outcomes, Student Performance, Asynchronous Learning, Computer-Mediated Learning, Computer-Mediated Communications, Education AdministrationAbstract
The research literature on Web-based learning supports the assumption that interaction is important for a successful course, yet questions exist regarding the nature and extent of the interaction and its effects on student performance. Much of the research is based on student perceptions of the quality and quantity of their interactions and how much they have learned in an online course. The purpose of this study is to examine performance in an online course in relationship to student interaction and sense of presence in the course. Data on multiple independent (measures of interaction and presence) and dependent (measures of performance) variables were collected and subjected to analysis. An attempt was made to go beyond typical institutional performance measures such as grades and withdrawal rates and to examine measures specifically related to course objectives.
References
Galt Global Review. Education news: Virtual classrooms booming. (December 2001). http://www.galtglobalreview.com/education/virtual_classrooms.html
Phipps, R.A. and Merisotis, J. P. What's the difference: A review of contemporary research on the effectiveness of distance learning in higher education. Washington, D.C.: The Institute for Higher Education Policy, 1999. http://www.chea.org/Events/QualityAssurance/98May.html
Phipps, R.A., Wellman, J.V., and Merisotis, J. P. Assuring quality in distance learning: A report prepared for the Council for Higher Education Accreditation. Washington, D.C.: The Institute for Higher Education Policy, 1998.
Stubbs, M. Language, Schools, and Classrooms. London: Methuen, 1976.
Sener, J. Bringing ALN into the mainstream: NVCC case studies. In Online Education: Proceedings of the 2000 Sloan Summer Workshop on Asynchronous Learning Networks. Volume 2 in the Sloan-C series, J. Bourne and J. Moore, Editors, Needham, MA: Sloan-C Press, 2001.
Chickering A.W. and Gamson, A.F. Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. Racine, WI: The Johnson Foundation, Inc., 1987.
Kumari, D.S. Connecting graduate students to virtual guests through asynchronous discussions: analysis of an experience. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 2001. http://www.aln.org/alnweb/journal/Vol5_issue2/Kumari/Kumari.htm.
Fulford, C.P. and Zhang, S. Perceptions of interaction: The critical predictor in distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education 7(3): 8-21,1993.
Kearsley, G. The nature and value of interaction in distance education. Distance Education Symposium 3: Instruction. University Park, PA: American Center for the Study of Distance Education, 1995.
Sherry, L. Issues in distance learning. International Journal of Distance Education, 1(4), 337-365, 1996.
Picciano, A.G. Distance Learning: Making Connections across Virtual Space and Time. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 2001.
Picciano, A.G. Developing an asynchronous course model at a large, urban university. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 2(1), 1998. http://www.aln.org/alnweb/journal/vol2_issue1/picciano.htm
Shea, P., Fredericksen, E., Pickett, A., Pelz, W., and Swan, K. Measures of learning effectiveness in the SUNY Learning Network. In Online Education: Proceedings of the 2000 Sloan Summer Workshop on Asynchronous Learning Networks. Volume 2 in the Sloan-C series, J. Bourne and J. Moore, Editors, Needham, MA: Sloan-C Press, 2001.
Hartman, J. L. and Truman-Davis, B. Factors related to the satisfaction of faculty teaching online courses at the University of Central Florida. In Online Education: Proceedings of the 2000 Sloan Summer Workshop on Asynchronous Learning Networks. Volume 2 in the Sloan-C series, J. Bourne and J. Moore, Editors, Needham, MA: Sloan-C Press, 2001.
Dziuban, C. and Moskal, P. Emerging research issues in distributed learning. Orlando, FL: Paper delivered at the 7th Sloan-C International Conference on Asynchronous Learning Networks, 2001.
Ruberg, L. F., Taylor, C.D., and Moore, D.M. Student participation and interaction on-line: A case study of two college classes: Freshman Writing and Plant Science Lab. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 2(1), 69-92, 1996.
Sproull, L.S. and Kiesler, S. Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT, 1991.
Mackay, W.E. Diversity in the Use of Electronic Mail: A preliminary inquiry.” ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 6(4), 380-397, 1989.
Varian, H. “The Information Economy.” Scientific American, 273(3), 200-202, 1995.
Beaudoin, M. Learning or lurking? Tracking the ‘invisible’ online student. Orlando, FL: Paper delivered at the 7th Sloan-C International Conference on Asynchronous Learning Networks, 2001.
Mehrabian, A. Some referents and measures of nonverbal behavior. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 1(6), 205-207, 1969.
Short, J., Williams, E. and Christie, B. The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. London: John Wiley and Sons, 1976.
Lombard, M. and Ditton, T. At the heart of it all: The concept of presence. Journal of Computer Mediated Communications, 3(2), 1997. http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol3/issue2/lombard.html
Tammelin, M. From telepresence to social presence: The role of presence in a network-based learning environment. In Aspects of Media Education: Strategic Imperatives in the Information Age. Tella, S., Editor. Media Education Centre. Department of Teacher Education. University of Helsinki. Media Education Publications 8, 1998.
Moore, G. Sharing faces, places, and spaces: The Ontario Telepresence Project Field Studies. In Video- Mediated Communication. Finn, K. E., Sellen, A. J. and Wilbur, S. B., Editors. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 301–321, 1997.
Buxton, W. A. S. Telepresence: Integrating shared task and person spaces. In Readings in Groupware and Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. Baecker, R. M. Editors. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, 816–822, 1993.
Biocca, F. Presence. Presentation at a workshop on Cognitive Issues in Virtual Reality, VR ‘95 Conference and Expo, San Jose, CA, 1995.
Rourke, L., Anderson, T. Garrison, D.R, and Archer, W. Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education/Revue de l'enseignement à distance, 2001. http://cade.athabascau.ca/vol14.2/rourke_et_al.html
Keegan, D. Foundations of Distance Education (3rd ed.). London: Routledge, 1996.
Healy, P. Harvard figures show most of its grades are A's or B's. The Boston Globe, p. B6, November 21, 2001).
Hanson, D., Maushak, N.J., Schlosser, C.A., Anderson, M.L., Sorenson, C., and Simonson, M. Distance education: Review of the literature, 2nd Edition. Washington, D.C.: Association For Educational Communications and Technology, 1997.
Tu, Chih-Hsiung. How Chinese perceive social presence: An examination of interaction in an online learning environment. Educational Media International; v38 n1 p. 45-60, 2001.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions
