THE IMPACT ON LEARNING OF AN ASYNCHRONOUS ACTIVE LEARNING COURSE FORMAT

Authors

  • David Spiceland
  • Charlene P. Hawkins

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v6i1.1873

Keywords:

nternet, Accounting, Learning Effectiveness, Active learning

Abstract

Among the many differences between asynchronous interactions and traditional classroom communication, the most critical differences involve those that may affect a student’s ability to learn. The efficacy of courses in facilitating instruction and learning is a key concern of all educators involved in or contemplating conducting such courses. This paper explores the impact on learning in asynchronous internet courses compared to learning in a traditional classroom setting. Specifically, the study examines student perceptions of the effectiveness of an active-learning, asynchronous internet course relative to that of a traditional classroom-based course. Students were asked to compare effectiveness on a variety of dimensions. The study yields results consistent with previous research related to learning outcomes along several measures, particularly with regard to students’ positive attitudes about their learning in an online computer course. However, the findings here offer new evidence that learning can also be enhanced with an active learning format in an online course.

References

Berge, A. L. Interaction in Post-Secondary Web-Based Learning. Educational Technology, 18 (1), 5-11, February, 1999.

Edelson, P. J. The Organization of Courses Via the Internet, Academic Aspects, Interaction, Evaluation, and Accreditation. Educational Resources Information Center, 2-15. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, ERIC No: ED421644, 1998.

Stringer, S. B. and Thomson, J. S. Evaluating for distance learning: Feedback from students and faculty. Educational Resources Information Center, 2-7. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, ERIC No: ED422879, 1998.

Winiecki, D. J. and Chyung, Y. Keeping the Thread: Helping Distance Students and Instructors Keep Track of Asynchronous Discussions. Educational Resources Information Center, 2-9. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, ERIC No: ED422886, 1998.

Jaffe, D. Asynchronous Learning: Technology and Pedagogical Strategy in a Distance Learning Course. Teaching Sociology, 25 (3), 262-277, October, 1997.

Wegner, S., Holloway, K. C., and Garton, E. M. The Effects of Internet-Based Instruction on Student Learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning: JALN, 3 (2), 1-9, November, 1999.

Larison, R. D. The Lecture Really Is Dead: Using Electronic Media to Teach On-Campus Courses. Educational Resources Information Center, 2-8. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, ERIC No: ED430525, 1997.

Rowntree, D. Teaching Through Self-Instruction. New York: Nichols Publishing Company, 1986.

Vieville, C. and Hoogstoel, F. Organizing Distance Learning Process Thanks to Asynchronous Structured Conversations. Educational Resources Information Center, 2-7. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, ERIC No: ED429550, 1997.

Soo, K. and Bonk, C. Interaction: What Does It Mean In Online Distance Education? Educational Resources Information Center, 2-8. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, ERIC No: ED428724, 1998.

Irani, T. Communication potential, information richness and attitude: A study of computer mediated communication in the ALN classroom. ALN Magazine, 2 (1), 1-12 pages, December, 1998.

Cheng, H. Lehman, C. J. and Armstrong, P. Comparison of Performance and Attitude in Traditional and Computer Conferencing Classes. The American Journal of Distance Education, 5 (3), 51-64, May, 1991.

Sandercock, G. and Shaw, G. Learners’ performance and evaluation of attitudes towards web course tools in the delivery of an applied sports science module. ALN Magazine, 3 (2), 1-10, December, 1999.

Downloads

Published

2019-03-19

Issue

Section

Empirical Studies