Faculty Satisfaction in ALNs: A Dependent or Independent Variable?

Joel Hartman, Charles Dziuban, Patsy Moskal


The authors describe relationships among infrastructure, student outcomes, and faculty satisfaction at the University of Central Florida (UCF). The model focuses on developmental process that progresses from courses with some Web presence to those that are driven by ALN. Faculty receive support for online teaching in the form of release time for training and development, upgraded hardware, and complete course development services. Students receive assistance in the form of orientation, around-the-clock help services, a Pegasus Connections CD-ROM, and a learning on-line Web site. The results of the impact evaluation at UCF indicate that faculty feel that their teaching is more flexible and that interaction increases in the ALN environment. On the other hand, they are concerned that on-line teaching may not fit into the academy culture. The authors argue that faculty satisfaction and student outcomes are strongly related and that their interaction is the most important outcome. Finally, the authors conclude that faculty satisfaction is both a dependent and independent variable that is nested within colleges, departments,
and program areas.


Faculty Satisfaction,ALN

Full Text:



Lewis, L., Alexander, D., and Farris, E. Distance education in higher education institutions. National Center for Education Statistics, NCES 98–062. U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC, 1997.

Moore, M. G., and Kearsley, G. Distance Education: A Systems View. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1996.

Oblinger, D. G., and Maruyama, M. K. Distributed learning. CAUSE Professional Paper Series #14 [PUB3014]. Available on-line at http://www.educause.edu/pub/profess.html, 1996.

Daigle, S., and Jarmon, C. Building the campus infrastructure that really counts. Educom Review, Vol. 32, Issue 4, pp. 35-38, 1997.

Sorg, S., and Truman, B. Learning about teaching through the Internet: lessons learned, technology and teacher education annual. In Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, Orlando, 1997.

Lauzon, A. C. Integrating computer-based instruction with computer conferencing: an evaluation of a model for designing on-line education. American Journal of Distance Education, Vol. 6, Issue 2, pp. 32-46, 1992.

Ocker, R., Hiltz, H. R., Turoff, M., and Fjermestad, J. The effects of distributed group support and process structuring on software requirements development teams: results on creativity and quality. Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 12, Issue 3, p. 127, 1995.

Noam, E. Electronics and the dim future of the university. Science, Vol. 270, pp. 247-249, 1995.

Etzioni, A., and Etzioni, 0. Communities: virtual vs. real. Science, Vol. 277, p. 295, 1997.

Williams, A. E. Integrating courses with the Internet: preparing the teacher as well as the learner. 1996 ASCUE Proceedings, ERIC Document ED405839, 1996.

Auter, P. J., and Hannah, M. S. The Challenge of Developing On-line Courses, ERIC Document ED406701, 1996.

Twigg, C., and Oblinger, D. The virtual university. A report from a joint Educom/IMB Roundtable, Washington, DC, November 5-6, 1996.

Willis, B. Enhancing faculty effectiveness in distance education. In Distance Education: Strategies and Tools, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications, 1994.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v4i3.1892

Copyright (c) 2019 Joel Hartman, Charles Dziuban, Patsy Moskal