The Use of Asynchronous Learning Networks in Nutrition Education: Student Attitude, Experiences and Performance

Authors

  • Graham Paul Shaw
  • Willy Pieter

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v4i1.1910

Keywords:

ALN, Newsgroups, Infrastructure, Student Resistance

Abstract

In this study a change in teaching strategy to involve a greater emphasis on asynchronous learning networks (ALNs) was implemented and the views of students (n=51) to this change were evaluated through responses to an online questionnaire. In response to Likert-type questions the majority of students demonstrated a positive view of this new model. Sixty-one percent of students felt that other types of online material would benefit the learning process and 80 % would recommend this module to a friend. Students acknowledged that the use of ALN-supported learning made the material easier
to understand (52%), the lecturer more accessible (66%) and enabled them to take a more active role in the learning process (55%). Though only 10% of students utilized the asynchronous newsgroup more than 5 times, 77% found reading the contributions of others useful. Contrary to this 76% preferred the more familiar lecturebased environment for subject delivery. In response to open-ended questions students’ views were more reserved and highlighted a range of problems such as inadequate infrastructure, unreliable computers, and poor access to the online material as well as resistance to a new teaching paradigm. Student performance was influenced by age and contribution to the newsgroup. Those who were younger had a lower grade (47.8 ? 15.8) than those who were older (52.0 ? 11.4). Students with higher grades (56.2 ? 10.3) contributed to the newsgroup while students with lower grades (45.7 ?
12.5) did not. Based on these observations, it is apparent that students do appreciate the advantages of ALNsupported learning though for a shift toward this model to be effective problems of access and system failure must be resolved. Implications for future ALN-based modules are discussed.

References

Davies, M.L., and Crowther, D.E.A., The Benefits of Using Multimedia in Higher Education: Myths and Realities, Active Learning, Vol. 3, 1995. http://www.cti.ac.uk/publ/actlea/issue3/crowther/index.html

Sosabowski, M.H., Herson, K., and Lloyd, A.W., Enhancing Learning and Teaching Quality: Integration of Networked Learning Technologies into Undergraduate Modules. Active Learning, Vol. 8, 1998. http://www.cti.ac.uk/publ/actlea/al8pdf/sosabowski.pdf

Wright, N., and Cordeaux, C., Rethinking Video-conferencing: Lessons Learned From Initial Teacher Education, Innovations in Education and Training International, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 194-202, 1996.

Spennemann, D.R., Gender Imbalances in Computer Access Among Environmental Science Students, Journal of Instructional Science and Technology, Vol. 1, No. 2, 1996. http://www.usq.edu.au/electpub/ejist/penne.htm

Schutte, J., Virtual Teaching in Higher Education: The New Intellectual Superhighway or Just Another Traffic Jam? 1996. http://www.csun.edu/sociology/virexp.htm

Teh, G.P.L., and Fraser, B.J., An Evaluation of Computer-assisted Learning in Geography in Singapore, Australian Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 55-68, 1994.

Phipps, R., and Merisotis. J., What’s the Difference? A Review of Contemporary Research on the Effectiveness of Distance Learning in Higher Education. A report by The Institute for Higher Education Policy, Washington, DC, 1999.

Dearing, R., Higher Education in the Learning Society: Report of the National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education, London, HMSO and NCIHE Publications, 1997.

Brown, A., Designing for Learning: What Are the Essential Features of an Effective Online Course, Australian Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 115-126, 1997.

Harasim, L., Online Education, Perspectives on a New Environment, Praeger, New York, 1990.

Hiltz, S.R. Impacts of College-level Courses Via Asynchronous Learning Networks: Some Preliminary Results, Journal of Asynchronous Learning, Vol. 1, No. 2, 1997. http://www.aln.org/alnweb/journal/jaln_Vol1issue2.htm - Hiltz

Conole, G and Oliver, M., A Pedagogical Framework for Embedding C&IT Into the Curriculum, Association for Learning Technology Journal, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 4-16, 1998.

Likert, R.A., A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes, Archives of Psychology, Vol. 140, 1932.

Robinson, H., Smith, M., Galpin, F., Birchall, D., and Turner, I., As Good As IT Gets: Have We Reached the Limits of What Technology Can Do For Us? Active Learning, Vol. 9, pp. 50-53, 1998.

Pham, B., Quality Evaluation of Educational Multimedia Systems, Australian Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 107-121, 1998.

Foley, G., and Schuck, S., Web-based Conferencing: Pedagogical Asset or Constraint? Australian Journal of Educational Technology. Vol. 14, No. 2, pp 122-140, 1998.

Farquhar, J., McGinty, B., and Kotcho, C., The Internet As a Tool for Social Construction of Knowledge, Indianapolis, In: Association for Educational Communications and Technology, ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 397 793, 1996.

Blum, K.D., Gender Differences in Asynchronous Learning in Higher Education: Learning Styles, Participation Barriers, and Communication Patterns, Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, Vol. 3, No. 1, 1999. http://www.aln.org/alnweb/journal/Vol3_issue1/blum.htm

Ory, J.C., Gender Similarities in the Use of and Attitudes About ALN in a University Setting, Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1997. http://www.aln.org/alnweb/journal/issue1/ory.htm

Downloads

Published

2019-03-19

Issue

Section

Empirical Studies