The Use of Asynchronous Learning Networks in Nutrition Education: Student Attitude, Experiences and Performance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v4i1.1910Keywords:
ALN, Newsgroups, Infrastructure, Student ResistanceAbstract
In this study a change in teaching strategy to involve a greater emphasis on asynchronous learning networks (ALNs) was implemented and the views of students (n=51) to this change were evaluated through responses to an online questionnaire. In response to Likert-type questions the majority of students demonstrated a positive view of this new model. Sixty-one percent of students felt that other types of online material would benefit the learning process and 80 % would recommend this module to a friend. Students acknowledged that the use of ALN-supported learning made the material easier
to understand (52%), the lecturer more accessible (66%) and enabled them to take a more active role in the learning process (55%). Though only 10% of students utilized the asynchronous newsgroup more than 5 times, 77% found reading the contributions of others useful. Contrary to this 76% preferred the more familiar lecturebased environment for subject delivery. In response to open-ended questions students’ views were more reserved and highlighted a range of problems such as inadequate infrastructure, unreliable computers, and poor access to the online material as well as resistance to a new teaching paradigm. Student performance was influenced by age and contribution to the newsgroup. Those who were younger had a lower grade (47.8 ? 15.8) than those who were older (52.0 ? 11.4). Students with higher grades (56.2 ? 10.3) contributed to the newsgroup while students with lower grades (45.7 ?
12.5) did not. Based on these observations, it is apparent that students do appreciate the advantages of ALNsupported learning though for a shift toward this model to be effective problems of access and system failure must be resolved. Implications for future ALN-based modules are discussed.
References
Davies, M.L., and Crowther, D.E.A., The Benefits of Using Multimedia in Higher Education: Myths and Realities, Active Learning, Vol. 3, 1995. http://www.cti.ac.uk/publ/actlea/issue3/crowther/index.html
Sosabowski, M.H., Herson, K., and Lloyd, A.W., Enhancing Learning and Teaching Quality: Integration of Networked Learning Technologies into Undergraduate Modules. Active Learning, Vol. 8, 1998. http://www.cti.ac.uk/publ/actlea/al8pdf/sosabowski.pdf
Wright, N., and Cordeaux, C., Rethinking Video-conferencing: Lessons Learned From Initial Teacher Education, Innovations in Education and Training International, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 194-202, 1996.
Spennemann, D.R., Gender Imbalances in Computer Access Among Environmental Science Students, Journal of Instructional Science and Technology, Vol. 1, No. 2, 1996. http://www.usq.edu.au/electpub/ejist/penne.htm
Schutte, J., Virtual Teaching in Higher Education: The New Intellectual Superhighway or Just Another Traffic Jam? 1996. http://www.csun.edu/sociology/virexp.htm
Teh, G.P.L., and Fraser, B.J., An Evaluation of Computer-assisted Learning in Geography in Singapore, Australian Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 55-68, 1994.
Phipps, R., and Merisotis. J., What’s the Difference? A Review of Contemporary Research on the Effectiveness of Distance Learning in Higher Education. A report by The Institute for Higher Education Policy, Washington, DC, 1999.
Dearing, R., Higher Education in the Learning Society: Report of the National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education, London, HMSO and NCIHE Publications, 1997.
Brown, A., Designing for Learning: What Are the Essential Features of an Effective Online Course, Australian Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 115-126, 1997.
Harasim, L., Online Education, Perspectives on a New Environment, Praeger, New York, 1990.
Hiltz, S.R. Impacts of College-level Courses Via Asynchronous Learning Networks: Some Preliminary Results, Journal of Asynchronous Learning, Vol. 1, No. 2, 1997. http://www.aln.org/alnweb/journal/jaln_Vol1issue2.htm - Hiltz
Conole, G and Oliver, M., A Pedagogical Framework for Embedding C&IT Into the Curriculum, Association for Learning Technology Journal, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 4-16, 1998.
Likert, R.A., A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes, Archives of Psychology, Vol. 140, 1932.
Robinson, H., Smith, M., Galpin, F., Birchall, D., and Turner, I., As Good As IT Gets: Have We Reached the Limits of What Technology Can Do For Us? Active Learning, Vol. 9, pp. 50-53, 1998.
Pham, B., Quality Evaluation of Educational Multimedia Systems, Australian Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 107-121, 1998.
Foley, G., and Schuck, S., Web-based Conferencing: Pedagogical Asset or Constraint? Australian Journal of Educational Technology. Vol. 14, No. 2, pp 122-140, 1998.
Farquhar, J., McGinty, B., and Kotcho, C., The Internet As a Tool for Social Construction of Knowledge, Indianapolis, In: Association for Educational Communications and Technology, ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 397 793, 1996.
Blum, K.D., Gender Differences in Asynchronous Learning in Higher Education: Learning Styles, Participation Barriers, and Communication Patterns, Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, Vol. 3, No. 1, 1999. http://www.aln.org/alnweb/journal/Vol3_issue1/blum.htm
Ory, J.C., Gender Similarities in the Use of and Attitudes About ALN in a University Setting, Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1997. http://www.aln.org/alnweb/journal/issue1/ory.htm
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions