Early Patterns of Faculty Compensation for Developing and Teaching Distance Learning Courses

Gary A. Berg

Abstract


This paper is an investigation into compensation practices for faculty developing and teaching distance learning courses. The research divides itself into two basic lines of inquiry: direct and indirect compensation (including royalties, training, and professional recognition). Also, economic models for distance learning are examined with a view towards understanding faculty compensation within attempts to reduce labor costs. The primary questions this research attempts to answer are: What are the current policies and practices in higher education for compensating faculty who develop and teach distance learning format courses? Will the increased use of distance learning format courses alter overall labor conditions for American faculty? If so, how? Although information is limited, it is found that faculty work in both developing and teaching distance learning format courses tends thus far in this early stage to be seen as work-for-hire under regular load with little additional indirect compensation or royalty arrangements.


Keywords


Distance Learning Courses,Faculty Compensation,Distance Learning Economics

Full Text:

PDF

References


National Center For Education Statistics, Statistical Analysis Report: Distance Education in Higher Education Institutions, U.S. Department of Education, 1997. http://nces.ed.gov/pubs98/distance/index.html

Maitland, C., and Rhoades, G., Technology Issues in Bargaining: The New Unionism, In The NEA 1999 Almanac of Higher Education, Washington, D.C., National Education Association, 1999.

Primary Research Group, Inc., The Survey of Distance Learning Programs in Higher Education: 1999 Edition, New York, 1999.

UCEA, Independent Study Catalog, Washington, D.C., University Continuing Education Association, 1998.

Bates, A. W., Technology, Open Learning and Distance Education, London, Routledge, 1995.

Daniel, J. S. Mega-universities and Knowledge Media: Technology Strategies for Higher Education. London, Kogan Page Limited, 1998.

Massy, W. F., and Zemsky, R., Using Information Technology to Enhance Academic Productivity, A Report from a June 1995 Educom Roundtable, EDUCAUSE, 1995. http://www.educause.edu/nlii/keydocs/massy.html

Twigg, C. A., Academic Productivity: The Case for Instructional Software, A Report from the Broadmoor Roundtable, Colorado Springs, Colorado, July 24-25, 1996. EDUCAUSE http://www.educause.edu/nlii/keydocs/broadmoor.html

Metlitzky, L., Bridging the Gap for the Mainstream Faculty: Understanding the use of technology in instruction Unpublished dissertation. Claremont, CA, Claremont Graduate University, 1999.

Jewett, F., A Framework for the Comparative Analysis of the Costs of Classroom Instruction Vis-À- Vis Distributed Instruction, Presented at Executive Forum on Managing the Cost of Information Technology in Higher Education sponsored by the NJICTL, Princeton, NJ, April 16, 1999. http://www.shu.edu/depts/itcosts/papers.html

Snowden, B. L. and Daniel, J. S., The Economics and Management of Small Post-secondary Distance Education Systems, Distance Education. 1, 1, 68-91, 1980.

Arvan, L., Ory, J.C., Bullock, C.D., Burnaska, K.K., Hanson, M., The SCALE Efficiency Projects. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network, Volume 2, Issue 2, September 1998. http://www.aln.org/alnweb/journal/vol2_issue2/arvan2.htm

Edwards, R. and Minich, E., Faculty Compensation and Support Issues in Distance Education, Washington, DC, The Instructional Telecommunication Council, 1998.

NEA, Bargaining Technology Issues in Higher Education: NEA Higher Education Contract Analysis System (HECAS) 1998-99 version, Higher Education Research Center, 1999.

Green, K. C., Campus Computing 1998: The Ninth National Survey of Desktop Computing and Information Technology in Higher Education, Encino, CA, The Campus Computing Project, 1999.

Finkelstein, M. J., Seal, R. K. and Schuster, J. H., The New Academic Generation: A Profession in Transformation, Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins University, 1998.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v4i1.1912



Copyright (c) 2019 Gary A. Berg