Student Perceptions of Their Interactions with Peers at a Cyber Charter High School
Keywords:K-12 online learning, learner-learner interactions, peer engagement
K-12 online students are increasingly communicating and collaborating with their peers; however, research on the topic is limited—especially research examining students’ perceptions and experiences. Guided by the Adolescent Community of Engagement framework’s concept of peer engagement, this case study examined learner-learner interactions at a cyber charter high school. Ten students were selected by teachers based on their ability to independently engage in learning activities—five students were more independent and five required more support from others. Each student took part in two, hour-long interviews for a total of 20 interviews. The interviewers covered students’ perceptions an experiences regarding teachers, parents, and peers. This report only focuses on peers. Students found that their interactions with peers allowed them to develop friendships, improve their motivation, receive peer instruction, and collaborate effectively with others. Challenges are also covered. The article concludes with recommendations for research and practice.
Anderson, T. (2009). A rose by any other name : Still distance education — a response to D . R . Garrison : Implications of online and blended learning for the conceptual development and practice of distance education. Journal of Distance Education, 23(3), 111–116.
Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1–17.
Archer, W. (2010). Beyond online discussions: Extending the community of inquiry framework to entire courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.005
Beck, D. E., Maranto, R., & Lo, W.-J. (2013). Determinants of student and parent satisfaction at a cyber charter school. The Journal of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2013.807494
Beck, D., Egalite, A., & Maranto, R. (2014). Why they choose and how it goes: Comparing special education and general education cyber student perceptions. Computers & Education, 76, 70–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.03.011
Beldarrain, Y. (2008). Engaging the 21st century learner: An exploratory study of the relationship between interaction and achievement in the virtual high school. Capella University, Minnesota.
Carver, D. L. & Kosloski, M. F. (2015). Analysis of student perceptions of the psychosocial learning environment in online and face-to-face career and technical education courses. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 16(4), 7-21.
Dawley, L., Rice, K., & Hinck, G. (2010). Going virtual! 2010: The status of professional development and unique needs of K-12 online teachers. Learning. Retrieved from http://edtech.boisestate.edu/goingvirtual/goingvirtual1.pdf
Digital Learning Collaboration. (2019). Snapshot 2019: A review of K-12 online, blended, and digital learning. Retrieved from https://www.evergreenedgroup.com/s/DLC-KP-Snapshot2019.pdf
Garrett Dikkers, A., Whiteside, A. L., & Lewis, S. (2013). Virtual high school teacher and student reactions to the social presence model. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 12(3), 156–170.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
Garrison, R. (2009). Implications of online learning for the conceptual development and practice of distance education. Journal of Distance Education, 23(2), 93–104.
Gemin, B., & Pape, L. (2017). Keeping pace with K-12 online learning 2016. Evergreen Education Group. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED576762.pdf
Gill, B., Walsh, L., Wulsin, C. S., Matulewicz, H., Severn, V., Grau, E., … Kerwin, T. (2015). Inside online charter schools. Cambridge, MA: Walton Family Foundation and Mathematica Policy Research. Retrieved from http://www.mathematica-mpr.com/~/media/publications/pdfs/education/inside_online_charter_schools.pdf
Harvey, D., Greer, D., Basham, J., & Hu, B. (2014). From the student perspective: Experiences of middle and high school students in online learning. American Journal of Distance Education, 28(1), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2014.868739
Johnston, S. C., Greer, D., & Smith, S. J. (2014). Peer learning in virtual schools. Journal of Distance Education, 28(1), 1–31.
Lin, C., Zheng, B., & Zhang, Y. (2017). Interactions and learning outcomes in online language courses. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(3), 730–748. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12457
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education: Revised and expanded from case study research in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Moore, M. G. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1–6.
National Education Association. (n.d.). Preparing 21st Century students for a global society: An educator’s guide to the “Four Cs". Retrieved from http://www.nea.org/assets/docs/A-Guide-to-Four-Cs.pdf
Oliver, K., Osborne, J., & Brady, K. (2009). What are secondary students’ expectations for teachers in virtual school environments? Distance Education, 30(1), 23–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910902845923
Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education, 14(2), 51–70. Retrieved from http://www.jofde.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/153/341
Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
Thomas, R. A., West, R. E., & Borup, J. (2017). An analysis of instructor social presence in online text and asynchronous video feedback comments. The Internet and Higher Education, 33, 61–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.01.003
Velasquez, A., Graham, C. R., & West, R. E. (2013). An investigation of practices and tools that enabled technology-mediated caring in an online high school. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(5), 277–299. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1465/2758
Watson, J., Pape, L., Murin, A., Gemin, B., & Vashaw, L. (2014). Keeping pace with K-12 online learning. Retrieved from http://www.kpk12.com/wp-content/uploads/EEG_KP2014-fnl-lr.pdf
Zhang, Y., Liu, H., and Lin, C. H. (2018) Research on class size in K-12 online learning. In K. Kennedy and R. Ferdig (Eds.), Handbook of research on K-12 online and blended learning (2nd ed.). (pp. 423-442). ETC Press. Retrieved from: http://repository.cmu.edu/etcpress/82/
Zeneli, M., Thurston, A., & Roseth, C. (2016). The influence of experimental design on the magnitude of the effect size -peer tutoring for elementary , middle and high school settings : A meta-analysis. International Journal of Educational Research, 76, 211–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.11.010
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions