Examining Student Reported Interaction and Satisfaction in Higher Education Administration Graduate Seminar-Style Blended Courses

Derek Thurber, Lois Trautvetter

Abstract


The purpose of this case study was to examine how a professional graduate program in higher education administration developed seminar-style courses in a blended format. Blended courses involved two extended in-person weekend sessions with synchronous online sessions, and other asynchronous coursework in between. This study explored the importance of interaction, student satisfaction, and motivation to student success. Data were collected through student surveys and faculty interviews from 11 courses within the same graduate degree program at a private, highly-selective research university from spring 2016 through spring 2018. Class size was the biggest factor relating to student interaction. This study also found synchronous online discussions had a greater impact than other learning activities and that satisfaction and interaction had a slight increase over time as students and instructors became more comfortable with the format.


Keywords


Blended Learning, Graduate, Seminar-Style, Community of Inquiry, Interaction

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2008). The development of a community of inquiry over time in an online course: Understanding the progression and integration of social, cognitive and teaching presence. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 12, 3-22.

Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2011). Understanding cognitive presence in an online and blended community of inquiry: Assessing outcomes and processes for deep approaches to learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(2), 233-250.

Ali, A., & Ahmad, I. (2011). Key Factors for Determining Students' Satisfaction in Distance Learning Courses: A Study of Allama Iqbal Open University. Contemporary Educational Technology, 2(2).

Anderson, T., Liam, R., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context.

Arbaugh, J. Ben, Bangert, A., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2010). Subject matter effects and the community of inquiry (CoI) framework: An exploratory study. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 37–44.

Arbaugh, J. B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S. R., Garrison, D. R., Ice, P., Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. P. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the community of inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. The internet and higher education, 11(3), 133-136.

Arslanyilmaz, A., Science, C., State, U., Moore, T., & States, U. (2016). Effects of instructor participation on the level of student participation and performance in an online course, 0(3), 1–7. http://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12512

Bettinger, E., Doss, C., Loeb, S., Rogers, A., & Taylor, E. (2017). The effects of class size in online college courses: Experimental evidence. Economics of Education Review, 58, 68–85. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2017.03.006

Bolliger, D. U., & Martindale, T. (2004). Key factors for determining student satisfaction in online courses. International Journal on E-learning, 3(1), 61-68.

Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. University Rochester Press.

Debourgh, G. A. (1999). Technology Is the Tool, Teaching Is the Task: Student Satisfaction in Distance Learning.

Garrison, R. D., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). CoI Framework | CoI. Retrieved November 7, 2018, from https://coi.athabascau.ca/coi-model/

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23.

Garrison, D. R., & Arbaugh, J. Ben. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 157–172.

Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2000). A Transactional Perspective on Teaching and Learning: A Framework for Adult and Higher Education. Advances in Learning and Instruction Series. New York, NY: Elsevier Science, Inc.

Garrison, D. R. (2017). E-Learning in the 21st Century: A Community of Inquiry Framework for Research and Practice (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Rutledge.

Gunawardena, C. (1995). Social presence theory and implications of interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferencing. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1(2–3), 147–166. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01694.x

Hillman, D. C. A., Willis, D. J., & Gunawardena, C. N. (1994). Learner-interface interaction in distance education: An extension of contemporary models and strategies for practitioners. American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 30–42.

Jung, I., Choi, S., Lim, C., & Leem, J. (2002). Effects of different types of interaction on learning achievement, satisfaction and participation in web-based instruction. Innovations in education and teaching international, 39(2), 153-162.

Kineshanko, M., Arthur, P., Garrison, R., & Graham, C. (2016). A Thematic Synthesis of Community of Inquiry Research 2000 to 2014 (Doctoral Dissertation). Athabasca University, Athabasca, Alberta, Canada.

Kolowich, S. (2012). Online learning and liberal arts colleges. Inside Higher Education, June 29. Retrieved from: www.insidehighereducation/news/2012/06/29/liberal-arts-college-explore-uses-blended-online-learning

Kuo, Y. C., Walker, A. E., Schroder, K. E. E., & Belland, B. R. (2014). Interaction, Internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses. Internet and Higher Education, 20, 35–50. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.001

Lee, J. (2012). Patterns of interaction and participation in a large online course: Strategies for fostering sustainable discussion. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), 260.

Lee, S. J., Srinivasan, S., Trail, T., Lewis, D., & Lopez, S. (2011). Examining the relationship among student perception of support, course satisfaction, and learning outcomes in online learning. Internet and Higher Education, 14(3), 158-163.

Lepper, M. R. (1988). Motivational considerations in the study of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 5(4), 289–309.

Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2009). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. US Department of Education. Retrieved September 20, 2018 from: ww2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf

Ouzts, K. (2006). Sense of community in online courses. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 7(3).

Picciano, A. G., & Dziuban, C. D. (Eds.). (2007). Blended Learning Research Perspectives (Vol. 1). The Sloan Consortium. http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Richardson, J. C., Maeda, Y., Lv, J., & Caskurlu, S. (2017). Social presence in relation to students’ satisfaction and learning in the online environment: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 402–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2017.02.001

Shea, P., Li, C. S., Swan, K., & Pickett, A. (2005). Developing learning community in online asynchronous college courses: The role of teaching presence. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(4), 59-82.

Swan, K., Garrison, D. R., & Richardson, J. C. (2009). A constructivist approach to online learning: the Community of Inquiry framework. In Information technology and constructivism in higher education: Progressive learning frameworks (pp. 43-57). IGI Global.

Ubell, R. (2017). Perspectives on Digital Learning. New York, NY: Routledge.

Vaughan, N. D., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Garrison, D. R. (2013). Teaching in Blended Learning Environments: Creating and Sustaining Communities of Inquiry. Athabasca University Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i3.2102



Copyright (c) 2020 Derek Thurber, Lois Trautvetter

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/