Impactful Leadership Traits of Virtual Leaders in Higher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i3.2113Keywords:
Virtual leader, online virtual leadership, virtual higher education, educational leadership, academic leadership, higher education, online learning.Abstract
Universities are increasingly leveraging virtual teams into the organizational structure and strategic framework for many functions including academic administration and faculty leadership. One benefit of a virtual workforce is the ability to hire the most qualified individuals regardless of where they are physically located. As the virtual workforce expands, leaders may intuitively rely on traditional face-to-face approaches and strategies for employee oversight and motivation. These techniques may be ineffective or challenging to use in the virtual environment necessitating new approaches. Leaders of virtual teams need to understand the intricacies associated with these groups and be cognizant of factors that assist in creating cohesiveness, trust, and communication amongst virtual teams.
This qualitative phenomenological study explores leaders’ perceptions surrounding competencies needed to effectively lead virtual teams in online education. A decisive sampling method was used to identify 10 experienced academic leaders who supervise virtual teams. As a result of the interviews, seven major themes emerged: (a) training and development; (b) trust; (c) emotional intelligence; (d) communication/team building/technology; (e) employee recognition and motivation; (f) leadership styles; and (g) virtual leadership competencies unique to higher education. Based on these themes and further evaluation the need for specific soft skills and robust technology emerged. Specifically, organizational success partially hinges on comprehensive training for virtual leaders, the significance of trust, emotional intelligence, and effective, respectful communication.
References
References
Allen, I. E. & Seaman, J. (2017). Digital learning compass: Distance education enrollment report 2017. Retrieved from the Digital Learning Compass website at https://onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/digtiallearningcompassenrollment2017.pdf
Avolio, B. J., Sosik, J. J., Kahai, S. S., & Baker, B. (2014). E-leadership: Re-examining transformations in leadership source and transmission. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 105-131. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.003
Azderska, T. & Jerman-Blazic, B. (2013). A holistic approach for designing humancentric trust systems. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 26(5), 417-450. doi:10.1007/s11213-012-9259-3
Bergold J., Thomas S. (2012). Participatory research methods: A methodological approach in motion. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 13(1), 1–35.
Berry, G. R. (2011a). A Cross-Disciplinary Literature Review: Examining Trust on Virtual Teams. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 24(3), 9-28.
Berry, G. R. (2011b). Enhancing effectiveness on virtual teams. Journal of Business Communications, 48(2), 186-206. doi:10.1177/0021943610397270
Bjorn, P. & Ngwenyama, O. K. (2009). Virtual team collaboration: Building shared meaning, resolving breakdowns, and creating translucence. Information Systems Journal, 19, 227-253.
Bonatti, A. & Horner, J. (2011). Collaborating. American Economic Review, 101. 632-663. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.2.632
Booth, B. (2011). Examining the critical factors of success in virtual team performance (Order No. 3442987). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (855031361). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/855031361?accountid=35812
Bryant, N. (2013). Leadership development as a relational process: A grounded theory investigation of leader experiences (Order No. 3558719). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1352008659). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.proxy1.ncu.edu/docview/1352008659?accountid=28180
Caillier, J. G. (2014). Toward a better understanding of the relationship between transformational leadership, public service motivation, mission valence, and employee performance: A preliminary study. Public Personnel Management, 43(2), 218-239. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/1665117205?accountid=35812
Carmeli, A., Sheaffer, Z., Binyamin, G., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Shimoni, T. (2014). Transformational leadership and creative problem-solving: The mediating role of psychological safety and reflexivity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 48(2), 115–135. doi:10.1002/jocb.43
Casebier, M. W. (2014). Exploring leadership styles involved in preventing deviant behaviors that affect the sustainability of virtual teams (Order No. 3618654). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1531330494). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.proxy1.ncu.edu/docview/1531330494?accountid=28180Consortium Journal of Hospitality & Tourism, 14(1), 89-97.
Chen, C. C., Wu, J., Ma, M., & Knight, M. B. (2011). Enhancing virtual learning team performance: A leadership perspective. Human Systems Management, 30(4), 215-228.
Cho, Y. J. & Lee, J. W. (2012). Performance management and trust in supervisors. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 32(3), 236-259.doi:10.1177/0734371X114214960
Creswell, J. W. (2009) Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. ISBN: 9781412965576
Crisp, G. & Cruz, I. (2009). Mentoring college students: A critical review of the literature between1990 and 2007. Research in Higher Education, 50(6), 525-545. doi: 10.1007/s11162-009-9130-2
Crisp, C. & Jarvenpaa, S. (2013). Swift trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 12(1), 45-56. doi:10.1027/1866-5888-a000075
Curry, S. P. (2016). Effects of the virtual environment on online faculty perceptions of
leadership: A grounded theory study (Order No. 10110291). Available from ProQuest Central; ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1797424474). Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/1797424474?accountid=35812
Eubanks, D., Eubanks. D.L., Palanski, M., Olabisi, J., Joinson, A., & Dove, J. (2016). Team
dynamics in virtual, partially distributed teams: Optimal role fulfillment. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 556-568. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.035
Feldman, M. S., Sködberg, K., Brown, R. N., & Homer, D. (2004). Making sense of stories: A rhetorical approach to narrative analysis. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 14(2), 147-170. doi:10.1 093/jopart/muh010
Fincham, D. (2013). Introducing online learning in higher education: An evaluation. Creative Education, 4(9), 540-548. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.proxy1.ncu.edu/docview/1448244965?accountid=28180
Fraenkel, J.R. & Wallen, N.E. (2007). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Goudy, K. (2015). A qualitative case study of manager trustworthiness of employees in the virtual workplace (Order No. 3685661). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1666453299). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.proxy1.ncu.edu/docview/1666453299?accountid=28180
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(59), 59-81.
Hill, N., Kang, J., & Seo, M. (2014). The interactive effect of leader–member exchange and electronic communication on employee psychological empowerment and work outcomes. Leadership Quarterly, 25(4), 772-783
Hirschy, M. (2011). Virtual Team Leadership: A Case Study in Christian Higher Education.
Christian Higher Education, 10(2), 97-111.
Jackson, M. R. (2015). Resistance to qual/quant parity: Why the ‘paradigm’ discussion can’t be avoided. Qualitative Psychology, 2, 181–198. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/qup0000031
Jang, C. (2013). Facilitating trust in virtual teams: The role of awareness. Advances in Competitiveness Research, 21(1/2), 61-77. Retrieved from http://www.eberly.iup.edu/ASCWeb/journals_acr.html
Kirkman, B., Rosen, B., Gibson, C. B., Tesluk, P. E., & McPherson, S. O. (2002). Five challenges to virtual team success: Lessons from saber, inc. Academy of Management Executive, 16(3), 67-79.
Krause, S. F. (2017). Leadership: Underrepresentation of women in higher education (Order No. 10259477). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1882307015). Retrieved from https://search-proquest-com.contentproxy.phoenix.edu/docview/1882307015?accountid=35812
Martin, F., Budhrani, K., Kumar, S., & Ritzhaupt, A. (2019). Award-winning faculty online teaching practices: Roles and competencies. Online Learning, 23(1), 184-205. doi:10.24059/olj.v23i1.1329.
McFarlane, D. A. (2011). Are there differences in the organizational structure and pedagogical approach of virtual and brick-and-mortar schools? Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 3(2), 83-98. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.proxy1.ncu.edu/docview/876712912?accountid=28180
McInnis, C., Ramsden, P., & Maconachie, D. (2012). A handbook for executive
leadership of learning and teaching in higher education. HERSDA News, 34(2), 26-27. Retrieved from https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?directe=true&AuthType=shib&db=eue&AN=79790385&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Mohr, S., & Shelton, K. (2017). Best practices framework for online faculty professional
development: A Delphi study. Online Learning, 21(4), 123-140. doi:10.24059/olj.v21i4.1273
Morgan, L., Paucar-Caceres, A., & Wright, G. (2014). Leading effective global virtual teams: the consequences of methods of communication. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 27(5), 607-624. doi:10.1007/s11213-014-9315-2
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. ISBN: 978-0-8039-5798-5.
Mukherjee, D., Hanlon, S. C., Kedia, B. L., & Srivastava, P. (2012). Organizational identification among global virtual team members: The role of individualism collectivism and uncertainty avoidance. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 19(4), 526-545. doi:10.1108/13527601211270002
Mukherjee, Debmalya., Lahiri, S., Mukherjee, Deepraj., & Billing, T. K., (2012). Leading virtual teams: how do social, cognitive, and behavioral capabilities matter? Management Decision, 50(2). 273-290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00251741211203560
Nydegger, R. & Nydegger, L. (2010). Challenges in managing virtual teams. Journal of Business
& Economics Research, 8(3), 69-82.
Ogren, T. A. (2016). A qualitative multi-case study of leadership and inter-team collaboration among higher education distributed employees (Order No. 10111447). Available from Dissertations & Theses @ Northcentral University. (1798489537). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.proxy1.ncu.edu/docview/1798489537?accountid=28180
Orcutt, J.M. & Dringus, L.P. (2017). Beyond being there: Practices that establish presence,
engage students and influence intellectual curiosity in a structured online learning environment. Online Learning 21(3), 15-35. doi: 10.24059/olj.v%vi%i.1231
Peart, D. (2014). The relationship between emotional intelligence and transformational leadership behavior in virtual academic leaders (Order No. 3617865). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1528557765). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.proxy1.ncu.edu/docview/1528557765?accountid=28180
Peñarroja, V., Orengo, V., Zornoza, A., & Hernández, A. (2013). The effects of virtuality level on task-related collaborative behaviors: The mediating role of team trust. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 967-974. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.020
Roussin, C. J. & Webber, S. S. (2012). Impact of organizational identification and psychological safety on initial perceptions of coworker trustworthiness. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27(3), 317-329. doi:10.1007/s10869-011-9245-2
Saafein, O. (2013). Exploring the relationship between mode of operation and performance of support teams in telecommunication companies (Order No. 3572889). Available from Dissertations & Theses @ University of Phoenix. (1434107386). Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/1434107386?accountid=35812
Schilke, O. & Cook, K. S. (2013). A cross-level process theory of trust development in interorganizational relationships. Strategic Organization, 11(3), 281-303. doi:10.1177/1476127012472096
Silvas, S. (2016). Leader-follower attachment, psychological safety, transformational leadership practices: Adjunct faculty (Order No. 10169564). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1848277155). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.proxy1.ncu.edu/docview/1848277155?accountid=28180
Sorsa, M. A., Kiikkala, I., & Åstedt-Kurki, P. (2015). Bracketing as a skill in conducting unstructured qualitative interviews. Nurse Researcher, 22(4), 8-12. doi: 10.7748/nr.22.4.8.e1317
Thaly, P. & Sinha, V. (2013). To Prevent Attrition in Business Process Outsourcing, Focus on People. Global Business & Organizational Excellence, 32(3), 35-43. doi:10.1002/joe.21483
Vega, R. P., Anderson, A. J., & Kaplan, S. A. (2015). A within-person examination of the effects of telework. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30(2), 313-323. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10869-014-9359-4
Weichun, Z., Sosik, J. J., Riggio, R. E., & Baiyin, Y. (2012). Relationships between transformational and active transactional leadership and followers’ organizational identification: The role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Behavioral &Applied Management, 13(3), 186–212. Retrieved from http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/76581079/relationships- betweentransformational-active-transactional-leadership- followersorganizationalidentification-role-psychological-empowerment
Williams, T., Layne, M., & Ice, P. (2014). Online faculty perceptions on effective faculty
mentoring: A qualitative study. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration,
(2), 1-19. Retrieved from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/summer172/Williams_Layne_Ice172.html
Ziek, P. & Smulowitz, S. (2014). The impact of emergent virtual leadership competencies on team effectiveness. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 35(2), 106-120
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions
