Faculty Perceptions of Online Teaching at a Mid-Sized Liberal Arts University

Dana L Shreaves, Yu-Hui Ching, Lida Uribe-Florez, Jesús Trespalacios

Abstract


This mixed-methods study examined faculty perceptions of online teaching at a mid-sized liberal arts university in order to understand faculty acceptance and participation in online teaching at the university. Seventy-nine participants responded to a survey that collected qualitative and quantitative data. Content analysis examined faculty perceptions of online teaching and identified six themes. An examination of 21 quantitative factors identified 17 factors reported by more than 50% of respondents to influence their decision to teach or not teach online. Study participants perceived online learning as attractive to students but they wanted any online courses carefully regulated, in part because online learning was seen as contrary to their teaching values. Participants were influenced by personal preferences but also the desire for robust faculty resources, and more effective technology and infrastructure. Implications and directions for future research were discussed.


Keywords


online teaching, liberal arts, faculty perceptions, incentives, barriers, mixed methods, survey

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ajjan, H. & Hartshorn, R. (2008). Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests. The Internet and Higher Education 11(2), 71-80.

Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2008). Staying the course: Online education in the United States, 2008. Needham, MA: Sloan-C. Retrieved from https://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/staying-the-course.pdf

Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2015). Grade level: Tracking online education in the United States. Babson Park, MA: Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group. Retrieved from http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/gradelevel.pdf

Allen, I. E., Seaman, J., Lederman, D. & Jaschik, S. (2012). Conflicted: Faculty and online education. Inside Higher Ed, Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group. Retrieved from https://onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/conflicted.pdf

Bacow, L. S., Bowen, W. G., Guthrie, K. M., Lack, K. A., & Long, M. P. (2012). Barriers to adoption of online learning systems in US higher education. New York, NY: Ithaka S+R.

Baker, V., & Baldwin, R. (2015). A case study of liberal arts colleges in the 21st century: Understanding organizational change and evolution in higher education. Innovative Higher Education, 40(3), 247–261.

Berge, Z. L. (1998). Barriers to online teaching in post-secondary institutions: Can policy changes fix it? Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 1(2).

Berge, Z. L. (2002). Obstacles to distance training and education in corporate organizations. Journal of Workplace Learning, 14(5), 182-189.

Berge, Z. L., Muilenburg, L. Y., & Haneghan, J. V. (2002). Barriers to distance education and training: Survey results. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3(4), 409-418.

Betts, K., & Heaston, A. (2014). Build it but will they teach?: Strategies for increasing faculty participation & retention in online & blended education. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 17(2).

Birch, D., & Burnett, B. (2009). Bringing academics on board: Encouraging institution-wide diffusion of e-learning environments. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(1) 117-134.

Bouwma-Gearhart, J. (2012). Research university STEM faculty members' motivation to engage in teaching professional development: Building the choir through an appeal to extrinsic

motivation and ego. Journal Of Science Education & Technology, 21(5), 558-570.

Clark, B. (1987). The Academic Life: Small Worlds, Different Worlds. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

Clark, B. (1997). Small worlds, different worlds: The uniquenesses and troubles of American academic professions. Daedalus, 126(4), 21-42.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.

Dos Santos. L. M. R., & Okazaki, S. (2013). Understanding e-learning adoption among Brazilian universities: An application of the decomposed theory of planned behavior. Journal of

Educational Computing Research, 49(3), 363-379.

Feldman, K. A., & Paulsen, M. B. (1999). Faculty motivation: The role of a supportive teaching culture. New Directions for Teaching & Learning, 1999(78), 71.

Haber, J., & Mills, M. (2008). Perceptions of barriers concerning effective online teaching and policies: Florida community college faculty. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 32(4-6), 266–283.

Herman, J. (2013). Faculty incentives for online course design, delivery, and professional development. Innovative Higher Education, 38(5), 397–410.

Hoyt, J. E., & Oviatt, D. (2013). Governance, faculty incentives, and course ownership in online education at doctorate-granting universities. American Journal Of Distance Education,

(3), 165-178.

Johnson, R., Stewart, C., & Bachman, C. (2015). What drives students to complete online courses? What drives faculty to teach online? Validating a measure of motivation orientation in university students and faculty. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(4), 528-543.

Lavrakas, P. J. (2008). Encyclopedia of survey research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Lee, J. (2001). Instructional support for distance education and faculty motivation, commitment, and satisfaction. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(2), 153-160.

Lloyd, S., Byrne, M., & McCoy, T. (2012). Faculty-perceived barriers of online education. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching. 8(1).

Maguire, L. L. (2005). Literature review–faculty participation in online distance education: Barriers and motivators. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 8(1).

Miller, M. T., & Husmann, D.E. (1999, Fall). Faculty incentives to participate in distance education. The Michigan Community College Journal, 35-42.

Mitchell, L. D., Parlamis, J.D., & Claiborne, S.A. (2015). Overcoming faculty avoidance of online education: From resistance to support to active participation. Journal of Management Education, 39(3), 350–371.

Rourke, L., & Anderson, T. (2004). Validity in quantitative content analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development,52(1), 5-18.

Seaman, J.E., Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2018). Grade increase: Tracking distance education in the United States. Babson Park, MA: Babson Survey Research. Retrieved from

http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/highered.html

Schopieray, S. E. (2006). Understanding faculty motivation to teach online courses (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (305307371)

Shea, P. (2007). Bridges and barriers to teaching online college courses: A study of experienced online faculty in thirty-six colleges. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(2),

-128.

Shea, P., Pickett, A., & Li, C. S. (2005). Increasing access to higher education: A study of the diffusion of online teaching among 913 college faculty. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 6(2).

Schifter, C. (2000). Faculty motivators and inhibitors for participation in distance education. Educational Technology, 40(2), 43-46.

Shiue, Y.-M. (2007). Investigating the sources of teachers' instructional technology use through the decomposed theory of planned behavior. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 36(4), 425-453.

Taylor, S., Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research 6(2), 144–176.

Thompson, C. (2015). On the decline and fall of the liberal arts. Academic Questions, 28(4), 417–427.

Vivolo, J. (2016). Understanding and combating resistance to online learning. Science Progress, 99(4), 399–412.

Wasilik, O., & Bollinger, D. (2009). Faculty satisfaction in the online environment: An institutional study. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(3), 173-178.

Wells, C. A. (2016). A distinctive vision for the liberal arts: General education and the flourishing of Christian higher education. Christian Higher Education, 15(1/2), 84-94.

Wingo, N. P., Ivankova, N. V., & Moss, J. A. (2017). Faculty perceptions about teaching online: Exploring the literature using the technology acceptance model as an organizing framework. Online Learning, 21(1).

Wolcott, L. L., & Betts, K. S. (1999). What's in it for me? Incentives for faculty participation in distance education. Journal of Distance Education, 14(2), 34-49.

Zhen, Y., Garthwait, A., & Pratt, P. (2008). Factors affecting faculty members’ decision to teach or not to teach online in higher education. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 11(3).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i3.2199



Copyright (c) 2020 Dana L Shreaves, Yu-Hui Ching, Lida Uribe-Florez, Jesús Trespalacios

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/