Creating a Social Presence Measure: Self-Rated Behaviors that Indicate Mediated Presence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v26i3.2202Keywords:
Social Presence, Online LearningAbstract
This study involved the creation and validation of a self-rated social presence measure. Study 1 utilized focus groups to create items. The focus group participants were presented with a set of items based upon past literature; through discussion of these items, a preliminary measure was created. Study 2 involved an exploratory factor analysis on the preliminary measure to eliminate items that did not work well with each other. This reduced the measure from 54 to 23 items. Study 3 validated a 21-item self-rated measure of creating a social presence (PSP), which can be used to determine if people have difficulty projecting themselves as real individuals willing to interact with other online communicators.
References
Allen, M., Titsworth, S., & Hunt, S. K. (2009). Quantitative research in communication. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Armellini, A., & De Stefani, M. (2016). Social presence in the 21st century: An adjustment to the community of inquiry framework. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47, 1202-1216. doi:10.1111/bjet.12302
Bangert, A. W. (2009). Building a validity argument for the community of inquiry survey instrument. The Internet and Higher Education, 12, 104-111. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.06.001
Berger, C. R., & Chaffee, S. H. (1987). Handbook of communication science. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Biocca, F., Burgoon, J. K., Harms, C., & Stoner, M. (2001, May). Criteria and scope conditions for a theory and measure of social presence. Paper presented at the Presence 2001: 4th International Workshop Philadelphia, Philadelphia. Available at: http://www.cmi.arizona.edu/AFOSR/Docs/BioccaBurgoonHarmsStoner_CriteriaAndScopeConditionsForATheoryAndMeasureOfSocialPresence_UNK_2004.pdf
Biocca, F., & Harms, C. (2002). Defining and measuring social presence: Contribution to the networked minds theory and measure. Proceedings of the Fifth Annual International Presence Workshop, 7-36. Porto, Portugal: Universidade Fernando Pessoa Press.
Biocca, F., Harms, C., & Burgoon, J. K. (2003). Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: Review and suggested criteria. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 12, 456-480. doi:10.1162/105474603322761270
Biocca, F., Harms, C., & Gregg, J. (2001). The networked minds measure of social presence: Pilot test of the factor structure and concurrent validity. Media Interface & Network Design Labs. Available at https://astro.temple.edu/~lombard/ISPR/Proceedings/2001/Biocca2.pdf
Brown, S. A., Fuller, R. M., & Vician, C. (2004). Who's afraid of the virtual world? Anxiety and computer-mediated communication. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 5, 79-107. doi:10.17705/1jais.00046
Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Caples, R. K. (2006). The role of social presence in online communities. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland ]. College Park, MD. Available at http://hdl.handle.net/1903/3768
Collins, K., Groff, S., Mathena, C., & Kupczynski, L. (2019).
Asynchronous video and the development of instructor social presence and student engagement. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education. 20, 53-70. Availabe at https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1201970.pdf
Cunningham, J. M. (2015). Mechanizing people and pedagogy: Establishing social presence in the online classroom. Online Learning, 19, 34-47. doi:10.24059/olj.v19i3.476
Driscoll1, A., Jicha1, K. Hunt, A. N., Tichavsky, & Thompson, G., (2012). Can Online Courses Deliver In-class Results? A Comparison of Student Performance and Satisfaction in an Online versus a Face-to-face Introductory Sociology Course. Teaching Sociology 40, 312–331. doi:10.1177/0092055X12446624
Easton, G., Easton, A., & Belch, M. (2003). An experimental investigation of electronic focus groups. Information & Management, 40, 717-727. doi:10.1016/S0378-7206(02)00098-8
Fall, L. T., Kelly, S., & Angle, M. (2010). To infinity and beyond: An empirical analysis of communication immediacy among online learners. Paper presented at the 18th Annual Bollinger-Rosado Symposium on Teaching & Learning Effectiveness / Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Worldwide Online Conference.
Garret, R. (2018). Does online higher education reduce inequality? Exploring the geography of the market. Eduventure Summit. Available at: https://www.insidehighered.com/sites/default/server_files/media/Eduventures%20Summit_Garrett_Online%20and%20Inequality_15%20June%202018.pdf
Garrison, D., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2, 87-105. doi:10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
Garrison, D., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2003). A theory of critical inquiry in online distance education. In M. G. Moore &
W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 113-127). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hair, J. F. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Harms, C., & Biocca, F. (2004). Internal consistency and reliability of the networked minds social presence measure. Proceedings of the Seventh Annual International Presence Workshop (pp. 246-251). Valencia, Spain: Universidad.
Jones, S., Madden, M. A., Clarke, L. N., & Pew Internet & American Life Project. (2002). The Internet goes to college: How students are living in the future with today's technology. Washington, D.C: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Avaliable at: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED472669.pdf
Kaufmann, R., Sellnow, D. D., & Frisby, B. N. (2016). The development and validation of the online learning climate scale (OLCS). Communication Education, 65, 307-321. doi:10.1080/03634523.2015.1101778
Kear, K., Chetwynd, F., & Jefferis, H. (2014). Social presence in online learning communities: The role of personal profiles. Research in Learning Technology, 22, 1-17. doi:10.3402/rlt.v22.19710
Kehrwald, B. (2008). Understanding social presence in text-based online learning environments. Distance Education, 29, 89-106. doi:10.1080/01587910802004860
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Kozan, K. (2016). A comparative structural equation modeling investigation of the relationships among teaching, cognitive and social presence. Online Learning, 20, 210-227. doi:10.24059/olj.v20i3.654
Lowenthal, P.R., & Dunlap, J. C. (2018) Investigating students; perceptions of instructional strategies to establish social presence. Distance Education 39, 281-298. doi:10.1080/01587919.2018.1476844
Lowenthal, P.R., & Snelson, C. (2017). In search of better understanding of social presence: An investigation into how researchers define social presence. Distance Education 38, 141-159. doi:10.1080/01587919.2017.1324727
Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA.: Sage.
National Center for Educational Statistics (2017). Fast facts: Distance learning. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Available at: https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=80
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Onwuegbuzie, A., & Leech, N. (2007). Validity and qualitative research: An oxymoron? Quality and Quantity, 41, 233-249. doi:10.1007/s11135-006-9000-3
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Paquette, P. (2016). Instructing the instructors: Training instructors to use social presence cues in online courses. Journal of Educators Online, 13, 80-108. doi:10.9743/JEO.2016.1.4
Pett, M. A., Lackey, N. R., & Sullivan, J. J. (2003). Making sense of factor analysis: The use of factor analysis for instrument development in health care research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Richardson, J. C., Maeda, Y., Ly, J., & Caskurlu, S. (2017). Social presence in relation to students' satisfaction and learning in the online environment: A meta-analysis. Comupters in Human Behavior, 71, 401-417. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.001
Ritchie, J., & Lewis, J. (2005). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. London, UK: Sage.
Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (1999). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education, 14, 50-71. Available at https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/58774853.pdf
Russell, S. S., Spitzmüller, C., Lin, L. F., Stanton, J. M., Smith, P. C., & Ironson, G. H. (2004). Shorter can also be better: The abridged job in general scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 878-893. doi:10.1177/0013164404264841
Scott, C. R., & Timmerman, C. E. (2005). Relating computer, communication, and computer-mediated communication apprehensions to new communication technology use in the workplace. Communication Research, 32, 683-725. doi:10.1177/0093650205281054
Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London, UK: Wiley.
Song, H., Kim, J., & Park, N. (2019). I know my professor: Teacher self-disclosure in online education and mediating role of social presence. International Journal of Human-Computer interaction, 35, 448-455. doi:10.1080/10447318.2018.1455126
Stewart, D. W., Shamdasani, P. N., & Rook, D. W. (2007). Focus groups: Theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Swan, K., & Shih, L. (2005). On the nature and development of social presence in online course discussions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9, 115-136. doi:10.24059/olj.v9i3.1788
Titsworth, S., Quinlan, M., & Mazer, J. (2010). Emotion in teaching and learning: Development and validation of the classroom emotions scale. Communication Education, 59, 431-452. doi:10.1080/03634521003746156
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2000). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Watson, B. R. (2007). Speaking up in the 21st century: The effects of communication apprehension and internet self-efficacy on use of social networking websites. Columbia, Mo: University of Missouri-Columbia. doi:10.32469/10355/4951
Wegerif, R. (1998). The social dimension of asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 2, 34-49. doi:10.24059/olj.v2i1.1928
Wrench, J. S., & Punyanunt-Carter, N. M. (2007). The relationship between computer-mediated-communication competence, apprehension, self-efficacy, perceived confidence, and social presence. Southern Communication Journal, 72, 355-378. doi:10.1080/10417940701667696
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions
