Emotional Presence in Building an Online Learning Community Among Non-traditional Graduate Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i4.2307Keywords:
online learning, Community of Inquiry, emotional presence, non-traditional graduate studentsAbstract
The Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework posits that a collaborative online teaching and learning process can be achieved through three interdependent dimensions of presence: cognitive presence, social presence, and teaching presence. Emotion is considered an important factor in successful online learning. This study explored non-traditional graduate students’ perceived emotional presence that emerged in participants’ online learning experiences. Based on quantitative and qualitative data from 45 non-traditional graduate students in the field of education, the study showed that participants demonstrated both positive emotional expressions (e.g., enjoyment and happiness) and negative expressions (e.g., frustration and disappointment) in their responses. Emotional presence ratings were found be significantly lower than cognitive, teaching, and social presence ratings. Emotions serving different functions were also identified in responses. Direct affectiveness surfaced where participants showed a strong emotional need to make connections with instructors and peers. Outcome emotions were also identified where participants showed emotional responses in regard to their eventual learning outcome. We also found emotional presence by itself a significant predictor of non-traditional graduate students’ satisfaction with online learning. Implications for research and practice are discussed.
References
Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2008). The development of a community of inquiry over time in an online course: Understanding the progression and integration of social, cognitive and teaching presence. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 12(3), 3–23.
Akyol, Z., Ice, P., Garrison, R., & Mitchell, R. (2010). The relationship between course socio-epistemological orientations and student perceptions of community of inquiry. Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 66–68.
Angelaki, C., & Mavroidis, I. (2013). Communication and social presence: The impact on adult learners' emotions in distance learning. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 16(1), 78-93.
Arbaugh, J. B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S. R., Garrison, D. R., Ice, P., Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the Community of Inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. Internet and Higher Education, 11(3-4), 133–136.
Arghode, V. (2012). Role of empathy in instruction. Global Education Journal, 3, 128-143.
Artino, A. R. (2008). Motivational beliefs and perceptions of instructional quality: Predicting satisfaction with online training. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(3), 260-270.
Artino, A. R. (2012). Emotions in online learning environments: Introduction to the special issue. Internet and Higher Education, 15, 137-140.
Bean, J. P., & Metzner, B. S. (1985). A conceptual model of nontraditional undergraduate student attrition. Review of Educational Research, 55(4), 485–540. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543055004485
Borup, J., Graham, C. R., & Velasquez, A. (2013), Technology-mediated caring: Building relationships between students and instructors in online k-12 learning Environments. In M. Newberry, A. Gallant, & P. Riley (Eds.), Emotion and school: Understanding how the hidden curriculum influences relationships, leadership, teaching, and learning (Advances in research on teaching, Vol. 18), pp. 183-202, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-3687(2013)0000018014
Boston, W., Díaz, S., Gibson, A., Ice, P., Richardson, J., & Swan, K. (2019). An exploration of the relationship between indicators of the community of inquiry framework and retention in online programs. Online Learning, 13(3). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v13i3.1657
Cardullo, V., & Burton, M. (2016). Building relationship through earning communities and participation in online learning environments: Building interactions in online learning. In L. Kyei-Blankson, J. Blankson, E. Ntuli, & C. Agyeman (Eds.), Handbook of research on strategic management of interaction, presence, and participation in online courses (pp. 448-471). Hershey, PA : IGI Global. http://doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-9582-5.ch018
Castellanos-Reyes, D. (2020). 20 years of the community of inquiry framework. TechTrends. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00491-7
Cleveland-Innes, M., & Campbell, P. (2012). Emotional presence, learning, and the online learning environment. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(4), 269– 292.
Cleveland-Innes, M., & Garrison, D. R. (Eds.). (2010). An introduction to distance education: Understanding teaching and learning in a new era (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Derks, D., Fischer, A. H., & Bos, A. E. (2008). The role of emotion in computer-mediated communication: A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 766–785.
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. Boston: Heath.
Fiock, H. (2020). Designing a community of inquiry in online courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(1). doi:http://dx.doi.org.proxy.tamuc.edu/10.19173/irrodl.v20i5.3985
Fox, E. (2018). Perspectives from affective science on understanding the nature of emotion. Brain and Neuroscience Advances, 2. https://doi.org/10.1177/2398212818812628
Garrison, D. R. (2011). Article review - social presence within the community of inquiry framework. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(1), 250–252.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87–105.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2010a). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. The Internet and Higher Education, 13, 5–9.
Garrison, D. R., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.04.001.
Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Fung, T. S. (2010b). Exploring causal relationships among teaching, cognitive and social presence: Student perceptions of the community of inquiry framework. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1-2), 31-36.
Giesbers, B., Rienties, B., Tempelaar, D., & Gijselaers, W. (2014). A dynamic analysis of the interplay between asynchronous and synchronous communication in online learning: The impact of motivation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(1), 30-50.
Gilmore S., & Warren, S. (2007). Emotion online: Experiences of teaching in a virtual learning environment. Human Relations, 60(4), 581-608. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726707078351
Grbich, C. (2007). Qualitative data analysis: An introduction (1st ed.). London: Sage Publications.
Hall, D. P. (2016). Online counselor training: Challenges and success in the experiences of online counselor educators (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). The University of North Carolina at Greensboro. Greensboro, NC.
Holton, E., Swanson, R., & Naquin, S. (2001). Andragogy in practice: Clarifying the andragogical model of adult learning. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 14(1), 118-143.
Horzum, M. B. (2015). Online learning students` perceptions of the community of inquiry based on learning outcomes and demographic variables. Croatian Journal of Education, 17(2), 535–567.
Huang, X., & Hsiao, E. (2012). Synchronous and asynchronous communication in an online environment: Faculty experiences and perceptions. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 13(1), 15-30.
Knowles, M. S. (1970). The modern practice of adult education: Andragogy versus pedagogy. New York: New York Association Press.
Koo, K. (2019). Is it real or not? Experiences of synchronous learning and training for counseling graduate students. In P. Semingson & J. Yoon (Eds.), Educational technology and resources for synchronous learning in higher education (pp. 129-150). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Korpershoek, H., Harms, T., Boer, H. d., Kuijk, M. v., & Doolaard, S. (2016). A meta-analysis of the effects of classroom management strategies and classroom management programs on students' academic, behavioral, emotional, and motivational outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 86(3), 643-680. doi:10.3102/0034654315626799
Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in education (1st ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Majeski, R. A., Stover, M., & Valais, T. (2018). The community of inquiry and emotional presence. Adult Learning, 29(2), 53-61.
Marchand, G. C., & Gutierrez, A. P. (2012). The role of emotion in the learning process: Comparisons between online and face-to-face learning settings, Internet and Higher Education, 15, 150-160.
Micari, M. & Pazos, P (2012). Connecting to the professors: Impact of the student-faculty relationship in a highly challenging course. College Teaching, 60, 41-47.
Muilenburg, L. & Berge, Z. (2005). Student barriers to online learning: A factor analytic study. Distance Education, 26(1), 29-48.
Murphy, L. Shelley, M. White, C., & Baumann, U. (2012). Tutor and student perceptions of what makes an effective distance language teacher. Journal of Distance Education, 32(3), 397-419.
Nagai, A. (2015). Content analysis: It’s not bean-counting. Academic Quest, 28, 472-479.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2019). Fast facts: Back to school statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=372
Oztok, M., Zingaro, D., Brett, C., & Hewitt, J. (2013). Exploring asynchronous and Synchronous tool use in online courses. Computers & Education, 60(1), 87-94.
Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 315-341.
Phelps, E. A. (2006). Emotion, learning, and the brain: From classical conditioning to cultural bias. In P. B. Baltes, P. A. Reuter-Lorenz, & F. Rösler, (Eds.), Lifespan development and the brain: The perspective of biocultural co-constructivism (pp. 200-216). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rodrigues-Ardura, I. & Meseguer-Artola, A. (2016). What leads people to keep on e-learning? An empirical analysis of users' experiences and their effects on continuance intention. Journal of Interactive Learning Environments, 24(5), 1030-1053.
Rourke, L., Anderson, T. Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (1999). Assessing social presence in asynchronous, text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education, 14(3), 51-70.
Seaman, J. E., Allen, E., & Seaman J. (2018). Grade increase: Tracking distance education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group. Retrieved from http://onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/gradeincrease.pdf
Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2009). Community of inquiry as a theoretical framework to foster "epistemic engagement" and "cognitive presence" in online education. Computers and Education, 52(3), 543–553.
Stenbom, S. (2018). A systematic review of the Community of Inquiry Survey. Internet and Higher Education, 39, 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.06.001.
Stenbom, S., Hrastinski, S., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2012). Student-student online coaching as a relationship of inquiry: An exploratory study from the coach perspective. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network, 16(5), 37–48.
Stenbom, S., Hrastinski, S., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2016a). Emotional presence in a relationship of inquiry: The case of one-to-one online math coaching. Online Learning, 20(1), 1-16.
Stenbom, S., Jansson, M., & Hulkko, A. (2016b). Revising the community of inquiry framework for the analysis of one-to-one online learning relationships. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 17(3), 36-53.
Stone, P. (2001). Content Analysis. In Encyclopedia of Sociology (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 417-422). New York: Macmillan Reference USA.
Swan, K., & Ice, P. (2010). The community of inquiry framework ten years later: Introduction to the special issue. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1-2), 1-4.
Swerdloff, M. (2015). Online learning, multimedia, and emotions. In S. Y. Tettegah, R. E. Ferdig, & M. P. McCreery, (Eds.), Emotions, technology, and learning. (pp. 155-175). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Science & Technology.
Tettegah, S. Y., Ferdig, R. E., & McCreery, M. P. (2015). Emotions, technology, and learning. San Diego, CA: Elsevier Science & Technology.
Tyng, C. M., Amin, H. U., Saad, M. N. M., & Malik, A. S. (2017). The influences of emotion on learning and memory. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01454
Williams, L. S. (2017). The managed heart: Adult learners and emotional presence online. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 65(2), 124-131. doi:10.1080/07377363.2017.1320204
Woods, K., & Frogge, G. (2017). Preferences and experiences of traditional and non-traditional university Students. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 65(2), 94 – 105.
Xiao, J. (2012). Tutors’ influence on distance language students’ learning motivation: Voices from learners and tutors. Distance Education, 33(3), 365-380.
Zydney, J. M., Denoyelles, A., & Kyeong-Ju Seo, K. (2012). Creating a community of inquiry in online environments: An exploratory study on the effect of a protocol on interactions within asynchronous discussions. Computers and Education, 58(1), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.009.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions
