Virtually Authentic: Graduate Students’ Perspective Changes toward Authentic Learning while Collaborating in a Virtual World

Songhee Han, Paul E. Resta

Abstract


This qualitative case study investigates graduate students’ perspective changes apropos their cross-national collaborative learning experience while participating in an online teaching and learning course jointly taught by graduate schools in the United States and Israel. The participants met virtually, on a weekly basis between November and December 2018, on a platform called Second Life, to design and participate in collaborative learning activities. On completion of the course, interviews were conducted with a small sample of student-participants regarding their experiences. During the design phase, participants’ dominant perceptions of their learning experiences were characterized by genuine “excitement” at the novelty of collaborating virtually with colleagues on the other side of the world. Their initial perceptions evolved during the participation phase to realization as learning communities emerged and students’ roles expanded beyond the scope of mere participants. In this study, the authors argue that participants’ construction of new knowledge resulted in authentic learning from the standpoints of social constructivism and online collaborative learning theory and further discuss the factors that enabled the participants’ authentic learning experience.


Keywords


virtual world, collaborative learning, cross-cultural collaborative learning, authentic learning, computer-supported collaborative learning, learning perspective change, three-dimensional learning environment, social constructivism, online collaborative l

Full Text:

PDF

References


Baker, S. C., Wentz, R. K., & Woods, M. M. (2009). Using virtual worlds in education: Second Life® as an educational tool. Teaching of Psychology, 36(1), 59-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986280802529079

Boniello, A., Paris, E., & Santoianni, F. (2019). Virtual worlds in geoscience education: Learning strategies and learning 3D environments. In Virtual Reality in Education: Breakthroughs in Research and Practice (pp. 781-800). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-8179-6.ch037

Boulos, M. N. K., Hetherington, L., & Wheeler, S. (2007). Second Life: An overview of the potential of 3‐D virtual worlds in medical and health education. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 24(4), 233-245. Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18005298/

Broadribb, S., & Carter, C. (2009). Using second life in human resource development. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(3), 547-550. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00950.x

Bronack, S., Sanders, R., Cheney, A., Riedl, R., Taschner, J., & Matzen, N. (2008). Presence pedagogy: Teaching and learning in a 3D virtual immersive world. International journal of teaching and learning in higher education, 20(1), 59-69. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ895226.pdf

Brown, J., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/1176008

Burbules, N. C. (2002). Like a version: Playing with online identities. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 34(4), 387-393. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013185022000011781

Chanprasitchai, O. A., & Khlaisang, J. (2016). Inquiry-based learning for a virtual learning community to enhance problem-solving ability of applied Thai traditional medicine students. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 15(4), 77-87. Retrieved from http://www.tojet.net/articles/v15i4/1549.pdf

Collins, A. (1988). Cognitive apprenticeship and instructional technology (Technical Report 6899). Cambridge, MA: BBN Labs Inc.

Collins, A., Brown, J.S., & Newman, S.E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L.B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning and instruction: Essays in honour of Robert Glaser (pp. 453-494). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.

De Lucia, A., Francese, R., Passero, I., & Tortora, G. (2009). Development and evaluation of a virtual campus on Second Life: The case of Second DMI. Computers and Education, 52, 220-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.08.001

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2008). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (p. 1–43). Sage Publications, Inc.

Dickey, M. D. (2005). Three‐dimensional virtual worlds and distance learning: Two case studies of Active Worlds as a medium for distance education. British journal of educational technology, 36(3), 439-451. https://bera-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00477.x

Dillenbourg, P., Järvelä, S., & Fischer, F. (2009). The evolution of research on computer supported collaborative learning: From design to orchestration. In: Balacheff N, Ludvigsen S, de Jong T, et al. (Eds.) Technology Enhanced Learning: Principles and Products. New York: Springer, pp. 3–19.

Gee, J. P. (2004). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Computers in Education, 1(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1145/950566.950595

Greenwald, S., Kulik, A., Kunert, A., Beck, S., Frohlich, B., Cobb, S., …Newbutt, N. (Eds.). (2017). Technology and applications for collaborative learning in virtual reality. Paper presented at Making a Difference: Prioritizing Equity and Access in CSCL, 12th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL). Retrieved from https://repository.isls.org//handle/1/210

Heath, S. B., & Mclaughlin, M. W. (1994). Learning for anything everyday, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 25(5), 471-489. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027940260501

Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2000). An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), 23–48. Retrieved from https://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=1031&context=edupapers

Heyward, M. (2002). From international to intercultural: Redefining the international school for a globalized world. Journal of Research in International Education, 1(1), 9–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/147524090211002

Hiebert, J., Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Fuson, K., Human, P., Murray, H., Oliver, A., & Wearne, D. (1996). Problem solving as a basis for reform in curriculum and instruction: The case of mathematics, Educational Researchers, 25(4), 12-21. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/1176776

Honebein, P.C., Duffy, T.M., & Fishman, B.J. (1993). Constructivism and the design of learning environments: Context and authentic activities for learning. In T.M. Duffy, J. Lowyck, & D.H. Jonassen (Eds.), Designing environments for constructive learning (pp. 87-108). Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

John-Steiner, V., & Mahn, H. (1996). Sociocultural approaches to learning and development: A Vygotskian framework. Educational Psychologist, 31(3-4), 191-206. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3103&4_4

Kostarikas, I., Varlamis, I., & Giannakoulopoulos, A. (2016). Blending distance learning platforms and 3D virtual learning environments. Διεθνές Συνέδριο για την Ανοικτή & εξ Αποστάσεως Εκπαίδευση, 6(1Α). http://dx.doi.org/10.12681/icodl.699

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York and Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Lee, K. M. (2004). Presence, explicated. Communication Theory, 14(1), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00302.x

Lee, M. J. W. (2009). How can 3D virtual worlds be used to support collaborative learning? An analysis of cases from the literature. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 5(1), 149-158. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/43518/

Mercer, N. (1996). The quality of talk in children's collaborative activity in the classroom. Learning and instruction, 6(4), 359-377. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(96)00021-7

Mercer, N., & Howe, C. (2012). Explaining the dialogic processes of teaching and learning: The value and potential of sociocultural theory. Learning, Culture, and Social Interaction, 1(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2012.03.001

Monahan, C., Ullberg, L., & Harvey, K. (2009, July). Virtual emergency preparedness planning using second life. In 2009 IEEE/INFORMS International Conference on Service Operations, Logistics and Informatics (pp. 306-310). IEEE. International Conference on Service Operations, Logistics and Informatics. https://doi.org/10.1109/SOLI.2009.5203950

Murray, J. A., Littleton, F., & Dozier, M. (2015). Use and perception of Second Life by distance learners: The effects of orientation session timing. International Journal of E-learning and Distance Education, 30(1). Retrieved from http://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/898/1575

Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms. Children, Computers and Powerful Ideas. New York: Basic books.

Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1967). The Child's Conception of Space. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.

Resta, P., & Shonfeld, M. (2014, March). Challenges and Strategies in Designing Trans-National Learning Team Projects in Virtual Worlds. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 403-409). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/147335/

Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, K., & Lamon, M. (1994). The CSILE project: Trying to bring the classroom into world 3. In: McGilly K (Ed.) Classroom Lessons: Integrating Cognitive Theory and Classroom Practice. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books; MIT Press, pp. 201–228.

Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage Publications, Inc.

Stott, D. (2007). Learning the second way. British Medical Journal, 335(7630), 1122-1123. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39400.460139.941

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc.

Titus, S. (2014). Using wikis and blog to mediate authentic learning: a case of teaching sport science education. New York: Routledge.

Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: identity in the age of the Internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Van Oers, B., & Wardekker, W. (1999). On becoming an authentic learner: Semiotic activity in the early grades, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31(2), 229-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/002202799183241

von Wright, J. (1992). Reflections on reflection. Learning and Instruction, 2(1), 59-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(92)90005-7

Vuopala, E., Hyvönen, P., & Järvelä, S. (2016). Interaction forms in successful collaborative learning in virtual learning environments. Active Learning in Higher Education, 17(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787415616730

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Warburton, S. & Perez-Garcia, M. (2009). 3D Design and Collaboration in Massively Multi-User Virtual Environments (MUVEs). In D. Russel, Cases on collaboration in Virtual Learning Environments: Processes and interactions. Hershey, PA, IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-878-9.ch002

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511803932.018

Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Young, M.F. (1993). Instructional design for situated learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41(1), 43-58. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02297091




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i4.2326



Copyright (c) 2020 Songhee Han, Paul E. Resta

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/