Exploring Student Perceptions of Flipgrid in Online Courses

Patrick R. Lowenthal, Robert L. Moore

Abstract


Asynchronous video-based discussions have affordances that can address some of the constraints of asynchronous text-based discussions. However, little research has been conducted on the use of asynchronous video-based discussions in online courses. As a result, the purpose of this exploratory study was to investigate students’ perceptions of using Flipgrid for asynchronous video-based discussions in fully online courses. We used a cross-sectional survey design to survey 79 students who used Flipgrid in a fully online course. Students overall reported that they liked using Flipgrid, it was easy to use, and that it helped improve social presence. In this paper, we will report the results of our inquiry and implications for research and practice.


Keywords


Video, Asynchronous Video, Interaction, Engagement, Discussions, Social Presence, Connectedness

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aloni, M., & Harrington, C. (2018). Research based practices for improving the effectiveness of asynchronous online discussion boards. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 4(4), 271–289. http://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000121

Arend, B. (2009). Encouraging critical thinking in online threaded discussions. The Journal of Educators Online, 6(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2009.1.1

Bolliger, D. U., & Martin, F. (2018). Instructor and student perceptions of online student engagement strategies. Distance Education, 39(4), 568–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1520041

Borup, J., West, R. E., & Graham, C. R. (2012). Improving online social presence through

asynchronous video. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(3), 195-203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.11.001

Borup, J., West, R. E., & Graham, C. R. (2013). The influence of asynchronous video communication on learner social presence: A narrative analysis of four cases. Distance Education, 34(1), 48-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2013.770427

Boston, W., Díaz, S. R., Gibson, A. M., Ice, P., Richardson, J., & Swan, K. (2009). An

exploration of the relationship between indicators of the Community of Inquiry framework and retention in online programs. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13(3), 67-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v13i3.1657

Boston, W. E., Ice, P., & Gibson, A. M. (2011). Comprehensive assessment of student retention

in online learning environments. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 14(4). http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/spring141/boston_ice_gibson141.html

Ching, Y. -H. (2014). Exploring the impact of role-playing on peer feedback in an online

case-based learning activity. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i3.1765

Ching, Y.-H., & Hsu, Y.-C. (2013). Collaborative learning using VoiceThread in an online graduate course. Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 5(3), 298–314. https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2013.05.021

Clark, C., Strudler, N., & Grove, K. (2015). Comparing asynchronous and synchronous video vs. text based discussions in an online teacher education course. Online Learning, 19(3), 48–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v19i3.668

Dyer, T., Aroz, J., & Larson, E. (2018). Proximity in the online classroom: Engagement, relationships, and personalization. Journal of Instructional Research, 7, 108–118.

Garrett Dikkers, A., Whiteside, A. L., & Lewis, S. (2012). Get present: Build community and connectedness online. Learning & Leading with Technology, 40(2), 22-25.

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23. http://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071

Gray, J. A., & DiLoreto, M. (2016). The effects of student engagement, student satisfaction, and perceived learning in online learning environments. NCPEA International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 11(1), 98–119.

Green, T., & Green, J. (2018). Flipgrid: Adding voice and video to online discussions. TechTrends, 62, 128–130. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-017-0241-x

Harasim, L. (1987). Teaching and learning on-line: Issues in computer-mediated graduate

courses. Canadian Journal of Educational Communication, 16(2), 117-135.

Howard, C. D., & Myers, R. (2010). Creating Video-annotated discussions: An asynchronous alternative. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.14434/ijdl.v1i1.853

Hrastinski, S. (2008). Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 31(4), 51-55.

Johnson, G. (2008). The relative learning benefits of synchronous and asynchronous text-based discussion. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(1), 166-169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00739.x

Jones-Roberts, C. (2018). Increasing social presence online: Five strategies for instructors. Distance Learning, 15(2), 47-50.

Khan, A., Egbue, O., Palkie, B., & Madden, J. (2017). Active learning: Engaging students to maximize learning in an online course. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 15(2), 107–115.

Koricich, A. (2013). Technology review: Multimedia discussions through VoiceThread. The Community College Enterprise, 19, 76–79.

Ludwig-Hardman, S., & Dunlap, J. C. (2003). Learning support services for online students:

Scaffolding for success. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v4i1.131

Maddix, M. A. (2012). Generating and facilitating effective online learning through discussion. Christian Education Journal, 9(2), 372-385. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/073989131200900209

Mahmoudi, L., & Gronseth, S. (2019). Video-based discussion: Promoting presence through interactions in online higher education courses. In E. Ossiannilsson (Ed.), Ubiquitous inclusive learning in a digital era: Advances in educational technologies and instructional design (1st ed., pp. 128–153). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. http://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-6292-4.ch006

Martin, F., Wang, C., & Sadaf, A. (2018). Student perception of helpfulness of facilitation strategies that enhance instructor presence, connectedness, engagement and learning in online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 37, 52-65. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.01.003

Nandi, D., Hamilton, M., & Harland, J. (2012). Evaluating the quality of interaction in asynchronous discussion forums in fully online courses. Distance Education, 33(1), 5–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2012.667957

Pacansky-Brock, M. (2012). Best practices for teaching with emerging technologies. New York, NY: Routledge.

Pacansky-Brock, M. (2014). Learning out loud: Increasing voluntary voice comments in online classes. In P. R. Lowenthal, C. S. York, & J. C. Richardson (Eds.), Online learning: Common misconceptions, benefits and challenges (pp. 99-114). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.

Picciano, A. G. (2002). Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1), 21-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v6i1.1870

Pinsk, R., Curran, M. J., Poirier, R., & Coulson, G. (2014). Student perceptions of the use of student-generated video in online discussions as a mechanism to establish social presence for non-traditional students: A case study. Issues in Information Systems, 15(I), 267–276.

Poll, K., Widen, J., & Weller, S. (2014). Six instructional best practices for online engagement and retention. Journal of Online Doctoral Education, 1(1), 56–72.

Richardson, J. C., Maeda, Y., Lv, J., & Caskurlu, S. (2017). Social presence in relation to students' satisfaction and learning in the online environment: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 402-417. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.001

Romero-Hall, E., & Vicentini, C. R. (2017). Multimodal interactive tools for online discussions and assessment. In P. Vu, S. Fredrickson, & C. Moore (Eds.), Handbook of research on blended learning pedagogies and professional development in higher education (pp. 85–105). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. http://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-1851-8.ch005

Rovai, A. P. (2002). Development of an instrument to measure classroom community. Internet and Higher Education, 5(3), 197-211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00102-1

Skylar, A. A. (2009). A comparison of asynchronous online text-based lectures and synchronous interactive web conferencing lectures. Issues in Teacher education, 18(2), 69-84.

Trespalacios, J., & Rand, J. (2015). Using asynchronous activities to promote sense of community and learning in an online course. International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design, 5(4), 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/IJOPCD.2015100101

Whiteside, A. L. (2015). Introducing the Social Presence Model to explore online and blended learning experiences. Online Learning Journal, 19(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v19i2.453

Whiteside, A. L., Garrett Dikkers, A., & Lewis, S. (2014). The power of social presence for learning. EDUCAUSE Review Online. http://er.educause.edu/articles/2014/5/the-power-of-social-presence-for-learning




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i4.2335



Copyright (c) 2020 Patrick R. Lowenthal, Robert L. Moore

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/