How Can We Improve Online Learning at Community Colleges?: Voices from Online Instructors and Students

Qiujie Li, Xuehan Zhou, Brad Bostian, Di Xu

Abstract


With the rapid growth of online learning at community colleges and the low course completion and performance associated with it, there has been increasing need to identify effective ways to address the challenges in online teaching and learning at this setting. Based on open-ended survey responses from 105 instructors and 365 students from multiple community colleges in a state, this study examined instructors’ and students’ perceptions of effective and ineffective instructional practices and changes needed in online coursework. By combining structural topic modelling techniques with human coding, we identified instructional practices that were perceived by both instructors and students as effective in supporting online learning as well as ineffective and needing improvement. Moreover, we identified a handful of misalignments between instructors and students in their perceptions of online teaching, including course workload and effective ways to communicate.


Keywords


Online instruction, community college, instructor perception, student perception

Full Text:

PDF

References


Baran, E., & Correia, A. P. (2014). A professional development framework for online teaching. TechTrends: Linking Research and Practice to Improve Learning, 58(5), 95–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-014-0791-0

Bambara, C. S., Harbour, C. P., Davies, T. G., & Athey, S. (2009). Delicate engagement: The lived experience of community college students enrolled in high-risk online courses. Community College Review, 36(3), 219–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091552108327187

Bawa, P. (2016). Retention in online courses: Exploring issues and solutions—A literature review. Sage Open, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015621777

Bolliger, D. U., & Martin, F. (2018). Instructor and student perceptions of online student engagement strategies. Distance Education, 39(4), 568–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1520041

Bork, R. H., & Rucks-Ahidiana, Z. (2013). Role ambiguity in online courses: An analysis of student and instructor expectations [CCRC Working Paper No. 64]. Columbia University. https://doi.org/10.7916/D8C24TGV

Brenden, S., Deil-Amen, R., & Rios-Aguilar, C. (2015). Anyone like me? Identity and social media among nontraditional-age community college students. bepress.

Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.007

Bowen, W. G., Chingos, M. M., Lack, K. A., & Nygren, T. I. (2014). Interactive learning online at public universities: Evidence from a six‐campus randomized trial. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 33(1), 94–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21728

Carnevale, A., Jayasundera, T., Repnikov, D., & Gulish, A. (2015). State online college job market: ranking the states. Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED558165

Cunningham, J. M. (2015). Mechanizing people and pedagogy: Establishing social presence in the online classroom. Online Learning, 19(3), 34–47. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1067482.pdf

Chen, Y., Yu, B., Zhang, X., & Yu, Y. (2016, April). Topic modeling for evaluating students' reflective writing: A case study of pre-service teachers’ journals. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (pp. 1–5). https://doi.org/10.1145/2883851.2883951

Croxton, R. A. (2014). The role of interactivity in student satisfaction and persistence in online learning. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 314–325. https://jolt.merlot.org/vol10no2/croxton_0614.pdf

Cox, R. D. (2006). Virtual access. In T. Bailey & V. S. Morest (Eds.), Defending the community college equity agenda. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Cox, R. D. (2009). The college fear factor. Harvard University Press.

Delen, E., & Liew, J. (2016). The use of interactive environments to promote self-regulation in online learning: A literature review. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 15(1), 24–33. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/194882/

Destin, M. (2018). Leveraging psychological factors: A necessary component to improving student outcomes. Third Way. https://www.thirdway.org/report/leveraging-psychological-factors-a-necessary-component-to-improving-student-outcomes

Fendler, R. J., Ruff, C., & Shrikhande, M. M. (2018). No significant difference—Unless you are a jumper. Online Learning, 22(1), 39–60. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1179646.pdf

Fike, D. S., & Fike, R. (2008). Predictors of first-year student retention in the community college. Community College Review, 36(2), 68–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091552108320222

Fry, R., & Cilluffo, A. (2019). A rising share of undergraduates are from poor families, especially at less selective colleges. Pew Research Center. https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/handle/10919/92670

Grandzol, C. J., & Grandzol, J. R. (2010). Interaction in online courses: More is not always better. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 13(2). https://www2.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/summer132/Grandzol_Grandzol132.html

Hart, C. M. D., Friedmann, E., & Hill, M. (2018). Online course-taking and student outcomes in California community colleges. Education Finance and Policy, 13(1), 42–71. https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp_a_00218

Hollenbeck, C. R., Mason, C. H., & Song, J. H. (2011). Enhancing student learning in marketing courses: An exploration of fundamental principles for website platforms. Journal of Marketing Education, 33(2), 171–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475311410850

Hrastinski, S. (2008). The potential of synchronous communication to enhance participation in online discussions: A case study of two e-learning courses. Information & Management, 45(7), 499–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2008.07.005

Hsiao, E. L. (2012). Synchronous and asynchronous communication in an online environment: Faculty experiences and perceptions. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 13(1), 15–30. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/131977/

Ives, K. S. (2006). Community colleges and distance learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 10(3), 85–94. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/67b0/f42a69e3a64a5c070e8a94516f9f27457383.pdf

Jackson, L. C., Jones, S. J., & Rodriguez, R. C. (2010). Faculty actions that result in student satisfaction in online courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 14(4), 78–96. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ909918.pdf

Jaggars, S. S., & Xu, D. (2016). How do online course design features influence student performance? Computers and Education, 95, 270–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.014

Johnson, G., & Davies, S. (2014). Self-regulated learning in digital environments: Theory, research, praxis. British Journal of Research, 1(2), 1–14. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/45935

Johnson, H. P., & Mejia, M. C. (2014). Online learning and student outcomes in California's community colleges. Public Policy Institute. https://www.luminafoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/r-514hjr.pdf

Joyce, T., Crockett, S., Jaeger, D. A., Altindag, O., & O'Connell, S. D. (2015). Does classroom time matter? Economics of Education Review, 46, 64–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2015.02.007

Karp, M. M., & Bork, R. H. (2012). “They never told me what to expect, so I didn’t know what to do”: Defining and clarifying the role of a community college student [CCRC Working Paper No. 47]. Columbia University. https://doi.org/10.7916/D8W09F54

Kear, K., Chetwynd, F., & Jefferis, H. (2014). Social presence in online learning communities: The role of personal profiles. Research in Learning Technology, 22. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v22.19710

Kozakowski, W. (2019). Moving the classroom to the computer lab: Can online learning with in-person support improve outcomes in community colleges? Economics of Education Review, 70, 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2019.03.004

Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310.

Li, L., Finley, J., Pitts, J., & Guo, R. (2011). Which is a better choice for student-faculty interaction: synchronous or asynchronous communication? Journal of Technology Research, 2, 1. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.467.7214&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Martin, F., Wang, C., & Sadaf, A. (2018). Student perception of helpfulness of facilitation strategies that enhance instructor presence, connectedness, engagement and learning in online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 37, 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.01.003

Martin, F., Wang, C., & Sadaf, A. (2020). Facilitation matters: Instructor perception of helpfulness of facilitation strategies in online courses. Online Learning, 24(1), 28–49. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i1.1980

Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (1998). A split-attention effect in multimedia learning: Evidence for dual processing systems in working memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 312–320. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.2.312

McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276–282. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3900052/

McKenna, K., Gebhardt, K., & Altringer, L. (2019). Exploring community in discussion board activities. The Online Journal of Distance Education and e-Learning, 7(3), 185. https://tojdel.net/journals/tojdel/volumes/tojdel-volume07-i03.pdf#page=43

Moallem, M. (2015). The impact of synchronous and asynchronous communication tools on learner self-regulation, social presence, immediacy, intimacy and satisfaction in collaborative online learning. The Online Journal of Distance Education and e-Learning, 3(3), 55–77. http://www.tojdel.net/journals/tojdel/volumes/tojdel-volume03-i03.pdf#page=62

Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (1999). Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role of modality and contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 358–368. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.2.358

Moser, C. A., & Kalton, G. (2017). Survey methods in social investigation. Routledge.

Qiang, J., Chen, P., Wang, T., & Wu, X. (2017, May). Topic modeling over short texts by incorporating word embeddings. In Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 363–374). Springer, Cham. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-57529-2_29

Rhode, J. (2009). Interaction equivalency in self-paced online learning environments: An exploration of learner preferences. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i1.603

Roberts, M. E., Stewart, B. M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder‐Luis, J., Gadarian, S. K., ... & Rand, D. G. (2014). Structural topic models for open‐ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 1064–1082. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12103

Schneider, M., & Clark, K. (2018). Completion reforms that work: How leading colleges are improving the attainment of high-value degrees. Third Way. https://www.thirdway.org/report/completion-reforms-that-work-how-leading-college-are-improving-the-attainment-of-high-value-degrees

Shieh, R. S., Gummer, E., & Niess, M. (2008). The quality of a web-based course: Perspectives of the instructor and the students. TechTrends: Linking Research and Practice to Improve Learning, 52(6), 61. https://search.proquest.com/openview/89ec4562b11c35d18bbfb08f36af9f23/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=40581

Stanford-Bowers, D. E. (2008). Persistence in online classes: A study of perceptions among community college stakeholders. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 4(1), 37–50. https://jolt.merlot.org/vol4no1/stanford-bowers0308.pdf

Tello, S. F. (2007). An analysis of student persistence in online education. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 3(3), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.4018/jicte.2007070105

Wladis, C., Conway, K. M., & Hachey, A. C. (2016). Assessing readiness for online education--Research models for identifying students at risk. Online Learning, 20(3), 97–109. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1113351.pdf

Walker, C. E., & Kelly, E. (2007). Online instruction: Student satisfaction, kudos, and pet peeves. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8(4), 309–319. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/106669/.

Xu, D., Li, Q., & Zhou, X. (2020). Online course quality rubric: A tool box. Online Learning Research Center. https://par.nsf.gov/servlets/purl/10232436.

Xu, D., & Jaggars, S. S. (2013). The impact of online learning on students’ course outcomes: Evidence from a large community and technical college system. Economics of Education Review, 37, 46–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2013.08.001

Xu, D., & Jaggars, S. S. (2014). Performance gaps between online and face-to-face courses: differences across types of students and academic subject areas. The Journal of Higher Education, 85(5), 633–659. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2014.11777343

Xu, D., Solanki, S., & Harlow, A. (2019). Examining the relationship between 2-year college entry and baccalaureate aspirants’ academic and labor market outcomes: Impacts, heterogeneity, and mechanisms. Research in Higher Education, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-019-09559-7

Xu, D., & Xu, Y. (2019). The promises and limits of online higher education: Understanding how distance education affects access, cost, and quality. American Enterprise Institute. http://hdl.voced.edu.au/10707/505263




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i3.2362



Copyright (c) 2021 Qiujie Li, Xuehan Zhou, Brad Bostian, Di Xu

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/