Parents’ Use of Digital Literacies to Support their Children with Disabilities in Online Learning Environments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i3.2407Keywords:
K-12 online learning, students with disabilities, virtual schools, parent roles in online learning, technological skillsAbstract
An emerging research base has highlighted various roles and responsibilities that parents of students with disabilities accept when they enroll their children in online schools. Since finding and using online texts and using various programs and applications that require search and evaluation skills to do work are typical for online learning, it follows that part of parent responsibilities in many families might involve using basic technological literacies or even more advanced digital ones. To focus on the range of technological literacies that parents employ, researchers gathered self-report data from parents about how they engage with online education technologies while working with their children with disabilities. Interviews with (n = 32) parents across six states in the West, Midwest, and Southern United States revealed that parents employ various skills with a specific set of purposes in mind. Literacies were used to (a) perform basic technological computing tasks, (b) evaluate information to supplement existing instructional materials, and (c) communicate with the school about children’s needs. Reported purposes for using these skills emerged as (a) instructing, (b) monitoring, (c) advocating, and (d) learning school expectations. Implications of this study include the potential for literacy-based approaches to parent preparation for supporting vulnerable children in online settings.
References
Alcena, F. M. (2014). Parental involvement and its impact on student achievement in Florida
virtual school. Distance Learning, 11(2), 25–32.
Auerbach, S. (2011). Conceptualizing leadership for authentic partnerships: A continuum to
inspire practice. In S. Auerbach (Ed.), School leadership for authentic family and com-munity partnerships: Research perspectives for transforming practice (pp. 29–52). Routledge.
Baquedano-Lopez, P., Alexander, R. A., & Hernandez, S. J. (2013). Equity issues in parental
and community involvement in schools: What teacher educators need to know. Review of Research in Education, 37(1), 149–182.
Basham, J.D., Stahl, S., Ortiz, K., Rice, M.F., & Smith, S. (2015). Equity matters: Digital &
online learning for students with disabilities. Center on Online Learning and Students with Disabilities. http://www.centerononlinelearning.res.ku.edu/equity-matters-digital-and-online-learning-for-students-with-disabilities/
Beck, D., Egalite, A., & Maranto, R. (2014). Why they choose and how it goes: Comparing
special education and general education cyber student perceptions. Computers & Education, 76, 70–79.
Litke, C. D. (1998). Virtual schooling at middle grades: A case study. University of Calgary.
Birks, M., & Mills, J. (2015). Grounded theory: A practical guide. Sage.
Black, E. W. (2009). An evaluation of family involvements’ influence on student achievement in
K-12 virtual schooling. [Unpublished dissertation]. The University of Florida, Gainesville, FL. https://www.proquest.com/docview/304883948?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true
Black, E. W., Ferdig, R. E. & DiPietro, M. (2008). An overview of evaluative instrumentation for virtual high schools. The American Journal of Distance Education, 22(1), 24–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640701713422
Brinkman, S., & Kvale, S. (2015). InterViews. Sage.
Boeije, H. (2009). Analysis in qualitative research. Sage.
Borup, J. (2016). Teacher perceptions of parent engagement at a cyber high school. Journal of
Research on Technology in Education, 48(2), 67–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2016.1146560
Borup, J., Graham, C. R., & Davies, R. S. (2013). The nature of parental interactions in an online
charter school. American Journal of Distance Education, 27(1), 40–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2013.754271
Borup, J., Stevens, M. A., & Waters, L. H. (2015). Parent and student perceptions of parent
engagement at a cyber charter high school. Online Learning, 19(5), 69–91.
Brinkman, S., & Kvale, S. (2015). InterViews. Sage.
Cooke, N. A. (2018). Fake news and alternative facts: Information literacy in a post-truth era.
American Library Association.
Dakers, J. (2006). Defining technological literacy. Palgrave Macmillan.
Digital Learning Collaborative. (2019). Snapshot 2019: A review of K-12 online, blended, and
digital learning. Evergreen Education Group. https://www.evergreenedgroup.com/keeping-pace-reports
Dong, C., Cao, S., & Li, H. (2020). Young children’s online learning during COVID-19 pandemic: Chinese parents’ beliefs and attitudes. Children and Youth Services Review, 118, 1–9.
East, T., Mellard, D., Stahl, W., Basham, J., & Smith, S. (2016). Response to OSEP request regarding the prevalence and experience of student in online instruction: May 25, 2016. Center on Online Learning and Students with Disabilities. University of Kansas. Author.
Epstein, J. L. (2011). School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and im-proving schools (2nd ed.). Westview Press.
Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., Koole, M., & Kappelman, J. (2006). Revisiting
methodological issues in transcript analysis: Negotiated coding and reliability. The Internet and Higher Education, 9(1), 1–8.
Gee, J. P., Hull, G., & Lankshear, C. (1997). The new work order. Westview Press.
Gwinnet County Public Schools. (2020). Results from spring 2020 digital learning days survey.
Gwinnet County, Georgia. https://publish.gwinnett.k12.ga.us/gcps/wcm/connect/ce9d31bb-377e-427c-a3f8-7dd8b943e512/Digital-Learning-Survey-Results-June-18-2020-BOE-Meeting.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CVID=nbezwrm
Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., & Sandler, H. M. (1995). Parental involvement in children’s
education: Why does it make a difference? Review of Educational Research, 67(1),
–42.
Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., & Sandler, H. M. (1997). Why do parents become involved in their
children’s education? Teachers College Record, 95, 310–331.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act [IDEA]. (2004). P.L. 108-446, 20 U.S.C. § 1400.
Ingersoll, B., Shannon, K., Berger, N., Pickard, K., & Holtz, B. (2017). Self-directed telehealth
parent-mediated intervention for children with autism spectrum disorder: Examination of the potential reach and utilization in community settings. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(7), e248. dpo: 10.2196/jmir.7484
Kellner, D. (2000). Multiple literacies and critical pedagogies: New paradigms. In P. P. Trifonas
(Ed.), In revolutionary pedagogies: Cultural politics, instituting education and the discourse of theory (pp. 196–221), Routledge.
Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the New Media Age. Routledge.
Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage.
Luke, A. (2003). Literacy and the other: A sociological approach to literacy research and policy
in multilingual societies. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(1), 132–141.
Martin, A., & Grudziecki, J. (2006). DigEuLit: Concepts and tools for digital literacy
development. Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences, 5(4), 249–267. https://doi.org/10.11120/ital.2006.05040249
Martin, A., & Rader, R. (2003). Information and IT literacy: Enabling learning in the
st Century. Facet.
Márton, S. M., Polk, G., & Fiala, D. R. C. (2013). Convention on the rights of persons with
disabilities. Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, United Nations.
Martzoukou, K., & Abdi, E. S. (2017). Towards an everyday life information literacy mind-set: A review of literature. Journal of Documentation, 73(4), 634–665.
McLennan, K. (1967). The manager and his job skills. Academy of Management Journal, 10(3),
–245.
Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching:
Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31(2), 132–141.
Molnar, A. Huerta, L., Shafer, S. R., Barbour, M. K., Miron, G., Gulosino, C. (2015).
Virtual schools in the U.S. 2015: Politics, performance, policy, and research evidence. National Education Policy Center. http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/virtual-schools-annual-2015; http://www.centerononlinelearning.res.ku.edu/wp-content/uploads/ParentReport3_SocSkills_Feb2018Update.pdf
Ortiz, K., Smith, S., Rice, M., & Mellard, D. (2017). Roles and responsibilities of parents of
online school students with disabilities. Center on Online Learning and
Students with Disabilities. http://www.centerononlinelearning.res.ku.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/ParentReport1_April2017.pdf
Parsippany-Troy Township Schools. (2020). Distance learning parent survey data. https://pthsd.k12.nj.us/UserFiles/Servers/Server_27012/File/For%20ParentsStudents/covid19/ParentSurveyResults.pdf
Rice, M. (2015). A rhetorical perspective of parental role construction of online learning testimonials. In M. Rice (Ed.), Exploring pedagogies for diverse learners online (pp. 117–137). Emerald Group Publishing.
Rice, M., & Carter, Jr., R. A. (2015). When we talk about compliance it’s because we lived it: Online educators’ experiences supporting students with disabilities. Online Learning, 19(5), 18-36. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1085761.pdf
Rice, M., & Deschaine, M., (2021). We need to help teachers withstand public criticism as they
learn to teach online. In R. E. Ferdig, & K. Pytash (Eds.), What teacher educators should have learned from 2020 (pp. 101–110). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/p/219088/
Rice, M., & Ortiz, K. (2020). Perceptions of accessibility in online course materials: A
survey of teachers from six virtual schools. Journal of Online Learning Research, 6(3), 245–264. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/217628/
Rice, M., Ortiz, K., Curry, T., & Petropoulous, R. (2019). A case study of a foster parent
working to support a child with multiple disabilities in a virtual school. Journal of Online Learning Research, 5(2), 145–158. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/184933/
Rice, M., Ortiz, K., Smith, S., & Mellard, D. (2017). Parents’ perceptions of social/emotional
support for their children with disabilities in fully online schools. Center on Online Learning and Students with Disabilities. http://www.centerononlinelearning.res.ku.edu/wp-content/uploads/ParentReport3_SocSkills_Feb2018Update.pdf
Schultz, A. J. (2019). Why parents of students with disabilities enrolled their child in an
online virtual charter school: Using extant data [Doctoral dissertation]. California State Polytechnic University, Pomona. https://scholarworks.calstate.edu/downloads/rj430670m
Smith, S., Rice, M., Ortiz., K., & Mellard, D. (2017). Parents’ perceptions of special education
service delivery when their children move to fully online learning. Center on Online Learning and Students with Disabilities. http://www.centerononlinelearning.res.ku.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/ParentReport2_IEP_April2017.pdf
Sorensen, C. (2012). Learning online at the K-12 level: A parent/guardian perspective.
International Journal of Instructional Media, 39(4), 297–308.
Street, B. V., & Street, B. B. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice (Vol. 9). Cambridge
University Press.
Tonks, D., Kimmons, R., & Mason, S. L. (2021). Motivations among special education students
and their parents for switching to an online school: survey responses and emergent themes. Online Learning, 25(2), 171-189.
Trainor, A. (2013). Interview research. In A. Trainor and E. Graue (Eds.), Reviewing qualitative
research in the social sciences (pp. 125–138), Routledge.
van Joolingen, W. (2004). The PISA framework for assessment of ICT literacy [Powerpoint
slides]. https://www.slideshare.net/cristobalcobo/the-pisa-framework-for-assessment-of-ict-literacy
Webber, S., & Johnston, B. (2017). Information literacy: Conceptions, context and the formation
of a discipline. Journal of Information Literacy, 11(1), 156–18.
Yamauchi, L. A., Ponte, E., Ratliffe, K. T., & Traynor, K. (2017). Theoretical and conceptual
frameworks used in research on family-school partnerships. School Community Journal, 27(2), 9–34.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions
