Student Initiative Empowers Engagement for Learning Online
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i3.2414Keywords:
Distance education, student engagement, pedagogical issuesAbstract
Assessing the degree to which students engage and learn from their online courses will be important as online courses are becoming more ubiquitous. This study sought to capture student perceptions of their independence as learners, their level of engagement, their effort exerted, and the amount of information they learned in online courses. The study was conducted over three years with 455 students who completed a self-assessment at the end of an intensive summer online course. Results showed an equal number of students agreeing and disagreeing that online courses help students learn the same amount of information encountered in a face-to-face course. The majority of students reported they were more independent (84.4%), were more engaged (54.5%) and exerted more effort (57.4%), in their online course than a typical face-to-face class. Recommendations are made for faculty creating online courses who have the opportunity to coach students on how to succeed in the online learning environment.
References
Al Tawil, R. (2019). Nonverbal communication in text-based, asynchronous online education. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(1), 144–164.
Allen, I. E., J. Seaman, R. Poulin, & T. T. Straut. (2016). Online report card:
Tracking online education in the United States, Babson Survey Research Group.
http://onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/onlinereportcard.pdf
Bawa, P. (2016). Retention in online courses: Exploring issues and solutions – a literature review, Sage Open, (Jan.-Mar), 1-11.
Bednar, J. (2018). Screen test: Why is online learning seeing a surge in popularity?, BusinessWest, 34(26), 32–36.
Bolton, E. C., & S. Gregory (2015). Minimizing attrition in online degree
courses, Journal of Educators Online, 12(1), 62-90.
Buelow, J. R., T. Barry, & L. E. Rich (2018). Supporting learning
engagement with online students, Online Learning, 22(4), 313–340.
Chen, B., Y. Chang, F. Ouyang, & W. Zhou (2018). Fostering student engagement in online
discussion through social learning analytics, The Internet and Higher Education, (37), 21-30.
Choi, B. (2016). How people learn in an asynchronous online learning environment: The
relationships between graduate students’ learning strategies and learning
satisfaction, Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 42(1), 1-15.
Cohen, J. & D. Jackson-Haub (2019). Designing learning for student engagement: An
online first year higher education experience, International Journal of Technologies
in Learning, 26(2), 35–41.
Collins, K., S. Groff, C. Mathena, & L. Kupczynski (2019). Asynchronous
video and the development of instructor social presence and student engagement,
Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 20(1), 53–70.
Cox, E. (2015). Coaching and adult learning: Theory and practice, New Directions for Adult
and Continuing Education, 148(Winter), 27-38.
Cundell, A., & E. Sheepy (2018). Student perceptions of the most effective and
engaging online learning activities in a blended graduate seminar, Online Learning,
(3), 87–102.
Davis, D., G. Chen, C.Hauff, G.-J. Houben (2018). Activating learning at
scale: A review of innovations in online learning strategies, Computers and Education, 125(Oct), 327-344.
Deschaine, M. E. & D. E. Whale (2017). Increasing student engagement in online
educational leadership courses, Journal of Educators Online, 14(1), 36-47.
Dixson, M. (2010). Creative effective student engagement in online courses: What do
students find engaging?, Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(2), 1-13.
Dumford, A. D. & A. L. Miller (2016). Learning online: Unintended consequences for
engagement?, Hawaii International Conference on Education, Honolulu, HI, January.
https://scholarworks.iu.edu/dspace/handle/2022/24109.
Everett, D. R. (2015). Adding value: Online student engagement, Information Systems
Education Journal, 13(6), 68-76.
Fosnacht, K., K. Copridge, & S. Sarraf (2017). Peering into the box of grit: How
does grit influence engagement in undergraduates? Paper presented at the Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference.
Gall, M.D., W.R. Borg, & J.P. Gall. (1996). Educational research: An introduction. Longman.
Groccia, J. E. (2018). What is student engagement?, New Directions for Teaching &
Learning, 154, 11–20.
Halverson, L. R. & C. R. Graham (2019). Learner engagement in blended learning
environments: A conceptual framework, Online Learning, 23(2), 145–78.
Jackson, Z. (2019). Online education 2.0, Perspectives on History, 57(2), 12–14.
Khan, A., O. Egbue, B. Palkie, & J. Madden (2017). Active learning:
Engaging students to maximize learning in an online course, Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 15(2), 107–115.
Kahn, P., L. Everington, K.Kelm, I. Reid, & F. Watkins (2017).
Understanding student engagement in online learning environments: The role of reflexivity, Educational Technology Research & Development, 65(1), 203–218.
Knowles, M. S., R. A. Swanson, & E. F. Holton (2005). The adult learner.
(6th ed.) Amsterdam: Routledge.
Kucuk, S., & J. C. Richardson (2019). A structural equation model of predictors of
online learners’ engagement and satisfaction, Online Learning, 23(2),
–216.
Lawrence, J., A. Brown, P. Redmond & M. Basson (2019). Engaging the
disengaged: Exploring the use of course-specific learning analytics and nudging to
enhance online student engagement, Student Success, 10(2), 47-58.
Leedy, P.D. & J.E. Ormrod. (2001). Practical research planning and design.
Merrill Prentice Hall.
Lehman R. M., & S. C. O. Conceição (2014). Motivating and retaining online
students: Research-based strategies that work, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Martin, F., C. Wang, & A. Sadaf (2018). Student perceptions of helpfulness of
facilitation strategies that enhance instructor presence, connectedness, engagement and learning in online courses, The Internet and Higher Education, 37, 52-65.
Martin, F., & D. U. Bolliger (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the
importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment, Online
Learning, 22(1), 205–222.
Ng, H. Z., & S. S. Baharom (2018). An analysis on adult learners’ satisfaction in online
education programmes, International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 12(7), 70–85.
Nortvig, A.-M., A. K. Petersen, & S. H. Balle (2018). A literature review of the factors
influencing e-learning and blended learning in relation to learning outcome, student satisfaction and engagement, Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 16(1), 46–55.
NSSE (2019). Annual results. Indiana University School of Education.
https://nsse.indiana.edu/NSSE_2019_Results/pdf/NSSE_2019_Annual_Results.pdf
Palmer, P. J. (1993). To know as we are known: Education as a spiritual journey. San
Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco.
Redmond, P., L.-A. Abawi, A. Brown, R. Henderson, & A. Heffernan (2018). An online
engagement framework for higher education, Online Learning, 22(1), 183–204.
Sadaf, A., F. Martin, & L. Ahlgrim-Delzell (2019). Student perceptions of
the impact of quality matters-certified online courses on their learning and engagement, Online Learning, 23(4), 214–233.
Sarraf, S., J. Kinzie, & B. Burch (2019). Measuring quality in online education: A NSSE-QM
collaboration, Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Presentation.
Sato, T., D. W. Ellison, & E. Tsuda (2019). Study habits and learning experiences of
undergraduate students in a physical education major online kinesiology course, The
Physical Educator, 76, 440-466.
Schroeder-Moreno M. S. (2010). Enhancing active and interactive learning online -
lessons learned from an online introductory agroecology course, North American
Colleges and Teachers of Agriculture Journal, 54(1), 21-30.
Seaman, J. E., I. E. Allen, & J. Seaman. (2018). Grade increase: Tracking distance
education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group.
Shrivastava, R., & P. S. Shrivastava (2017). Employing adult learning theories in designing a
module. Research and Development in Medical Education, 6(2), 64,65.
Shulman, L. (2002). Making differences: A table of learning, Change, 34(6), 36-44.
Smith, S.P. (2017). Adult learning: Effective training methods, Professional Safety, 62(12),
-25.
Stevenson, T. (2013). Online student persistence: What matters is outside the classroom,
Journal of Applied Learning Technology, 3(1), 21-25.
Stone, C. & M. Springer (2019). Interactivity, connectedness and ‘teacher-presence’:
Engaging and retaining students online, Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 59(2), 146-169.
Stott, P. (2016). The perils of a lack of student engagement: Reflections of a ‘lonely,
brave, and rather exposed’ online instructor, British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(1), 51–64.
Technavio Research (2019). Global academic e-learning market 2019-2023: Growing
popularity of online microlearning to boost growth, Business Wire.
Xiao, J. (2017). Learner-content interaction in distance education: The weakest link in
interaction research, Distance Education, 38(1), 123–135.
Yang, Y., Y. Cho, S. Mathew & S. Worth (2011). College student effort expenditure in online
versus face-to-face courses: The role of gender, team learning orientation, and sense of
classroom community, Journal of Advanced Academics, 22(4), 619-638.
Yarbrough, J. R. (2018). Adapting adult learning theory to support innovative,
advanced, online learning, Research in Higher Education Journal, 35, 1-15.
You, J. W. (2016). Identifying significant indicators using LMS data to predict course
achievement in online learning, The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 23-30.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions
