“We Overwhelm Them with Hope”: How Online Mentors Can Support Online Learners

Camey L. Andersen, Richard E. West

Abstract


This survey research study analyzed responses from 143 mentors from around the world participating in a global higher education initiative. Results confirmed the effectiveness of four mentoring domains identified in the literature, reporting the most success from providing emotional and psychological support for students. This article provides mentoring strategies including student goal setting, identifies characteristics of an online role model, and shows the importance of online mentors’ confidence in students gaining technology skills. The study has additionally contributed to the literature supporting (a) benefits of online mentoring for nontraditional students, (b) influence of technology on mentoring challenges, and (c) role assumption in online mentoring. Additionally, the study provided a literature review of the background of online mentoring and mentoring practices, the benefits and challenges of online mentoring, and lessons learned from research. This work presents a comprehensive understanding of online mentoring, providing support for mentors seeking to improve their performance as well as recommendations for creating mentoring programs to improve organizations.


Keywords


best practices, higher education, mentors, online education, social support, technology

Full Text:

PDF

References


Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2013). Changing course: Ten years of tracking online education in the United States. Sloan Consortium. (ED541571). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED541571.pdf

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-141886_2

Ambrose, G. A., & Williamson Ambrose, L. (2013). The blended advising model: Transforming advising with ePortfolios. International Journal of ePortfolio, 3(1), 75–89.

Barbuto, J. E., Story, J. S., Fritz, S. M., & Schinstock, J. L. (2011). Full range advising: Transforming the advisor–advisee experience. Journal of College Student Development, 52(6), 656–670. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2011.0079

Bear, S., & Jones, G. (2017). Students as protégés: Factors that lead to success. Journal of Management Education, 41(1), 146–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562916658688

Bettinger, E. P., Fox, L., Loeb, S., & Taylor, E. S. (2017). Virtual classrooms: How online college courses affect student success. American Economic Review, 107(9), 2855–285575. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20151193

Bierema, L. L., & Merriam, S. B. (2002). E-mentoring: Using computer mediated communication to enhance the mentoring process. Innovative Higher Education, 26(3), 211–227.

Bolliger, D. U., & Inan, F. A. (2012). Development and validation of the online student

connectedness survey (OSCS). The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(3), 41–65. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i3.1171

Borup, J., Graham, C. R., West, R. E., Archambault, L., & Spring, K. J. (2020). Academic

communities of engagement: An expansive lens for examining support structures in

blended and online learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(2), 807–832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09744-x

Boston, W. E., & Ice, P. (2011). Assessing facilitator performance as an influence on student satisfaction. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 14(2), 1–5.

Bowers, J., & Kumar, P. (2015). Students' perceptions of teaching and social presence: A comparative analysis of face-to-face and online learning environments. IJWLTT, 10(1), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijwltt.2015010103

Bowser, A., Hux, A., McBride, J., Nichols, C., & Nichols, J. (2014). The roles of site-based mentors in educational leadership programs. College Student Journal, 48(3), 468–472.

Braun, J., & Zolfagharian, M. (2016). Student participation in academic advising:

Propensity, behavior, attribution and satisfaction. Research in Higher Education, 57(8), 968–989. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-016-9414-2

Braun, V., Clarke, V., Hayfield, N., & Terry, G. (2019). Thematic analysis. In C. Willig & W. S. Rogers (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology (pp. 843–860). Sage.

BYU-Pathway Worldwide. (2019, April 1). https://www.byupathway.org

BYU-Pathway Worldwide, (2021, October 1). Facts and Stats,

https://www.byupathway.org/facts-stats

Cass, D., & Hammond, S. (2014). Bridging the gap: Technology and veteran academic

success. Online Learning, 19(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v19i1.517

Dawson, P. (2014). Beyond a definition: Toward a framework for designing and specifying mentoring models. Educational Researcher, 43(3), 137–45.

https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14528751

Ensher, E. A., Heun, C., & Blanchard, A. (2003). Online mentoring and computer-mediated communication: New directions in research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63(2), 264–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-8791(03)00044-7

Fink, A. (2003). The survey handbook. Sage.

Gravel, C. A. (2012). Student-advisor interaction in undergraduate online degree programs: A factor in student retention. NACADA Journal, 32(2), 56–67.

Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). Sage.

Halupa, C., & Henry, M. (2015). Using VineUp to match students with alumni industry

mentors in engineering: A pilot study. International Journal of Higher Education,

(4), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v4n4p105

Hamilton, B. A., & Scandura, T. A. (2003). E-mentoring: Implications for organizational

learning and development in a wired world. Organizational Dynamics, 31(4), 388–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-2616(02)00128-6

Healy, M. A., Lancaster, J. M., Liddell, D. L., & Stewart, D. L. (2012). The role of the campus professional as a moral mentor. New Directions for Student

Services, 2012(139), 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1002/ss

Henry, J., Bruland, H. H., & Sano-Franchini, J. (2011). Course-embedded mentoring

for first-year students: Melding academic subject support with role modeling, psycho-social support, and goal setting. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 5(2). https://doi.org10.20429/ijsotl.2011.050216

Hernandez, P. R., Estrada, M., Woodcock, A., & Schultz, P. W. (2017). Protégé perceptions of high mentorship quality depend on shared values more than on demographic match. Journal of Experimental Education, 85(3), 450–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2016.1246405

Homitz, D. J., & Berge, Z. L. (2008). Using e‐mentoring to sustain distance training and education. The Learning Organization, 15(4), 326–335. https://doi.org/10.1108/09696470810879574

Houck, C. (2011). Multigenerational and virtual: How do we build a mentoring

program for today’s workforce? Performance Improvement, 50(2), 25–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.20197

Jacobi, M. (1991). Mentoring and undergraduate academic success: A literature review. Review of Educational Research, 61(4), 505–532. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543061004505

Jansen, H. (2010). The logic of qualitative survey research and its position in the field

of social research methods. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 11(2). https://doi.org/

17169/fqs-11.2.1450

Johnson, N., Veletsianos, G., & Seaman, J. (2020). U.S. faculty and administrators’

experiences and approaches in the early weeks of the COVID-19 pandemic. Online

Learning, 24(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i2.2285

Krause, J., Dias, L. P., Schedler, C., Krause, J., Dias, L. P., & Schedler, C. (2015).

Competency-based education: A framework for measuring quality courses.

Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 18(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/

1080/02701367.2016.1213610

Lenear, P. E. (2007). E-mentoring interaction models. [Paper presentation]. International Research Conference in the Americas of the Academy of Human Resource Development, Indianapolis, IN. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED504399

Murphy, W. M. (2011). From e-mentoring to blended mentoring: Increasing students’

developmental initiation and mentors' satisfaction. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 10(4), 606–622. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2010.0090

Natanson, H. (2020, November 24). Failing grades spike in Virginia’s largest school system as online learning gap emerges nationwide. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/fairfax-schools-more-failing-grades/2020/11/24/1ac2412e-2e34-11eb-96c2-aac3f162215d_story.html

Neely, A. R., Cotton, J., & Neely, A. D. (2017). E-mentoring: A model and review of the literature. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 9(3), 220–242. https://doi.org/10.17705/1thci.00096

Nora, A., & Crisp, G. (2007). Mentoring students: Conceptualizing and validating the multi-dimensions of a support system. Journal of College Student Retention, 9(3), 337–356.

Ormston, R., Spencer, L., Barnard, M., & Snape, D. (2014). The foundations of qualitative

research. In J. Ritche, J. Lewis, C. McNaughton Nicholls, & R. Ormston (Eds.), A guide

for social science students and researchers. SAGE.

Poor, C. J., & Brown, S. (2013). Increasing retention of women in engineering at WSU:

A model for a women’s mentoring program. College Student Journal, 47(3),

–428.

Purcell, K. (2004). Making e-mentoring more effective. American Journal of Health-

System Pharmacy, 61(3), 284–286. https://doi.org/ 10.1093/ajhp/61.3.284

Rees Lewis, D., Harburg, E., Gerber, E., & Easterday, M. (2015). Building support tools to connect novice designers with professional coaches. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition (pp. 43–52). ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/2757226.2757248

Sanyal, C., & Rigby, C. (2017). E-mentoring as a HRD intervention: An exploratory action research study within an international professional mentoring scheme. Human Resource Development International, 20(1), 18–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2016.1220156

Seaman, J. E., Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2018). Grade increase: Tracking distance education in the United States. The Babson Survey Research Group.

Shandley, T. C. (1989). The use of mentors for leadership development. NASPA Journal, 27(1), 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1989.11072135

Shrestha, C. H., May, S., Edirisingha, P., Burke, L., & Linsey, T. (2009). From face-to-face to e-mentoring: Does the “e” add any value for mentors? International Journal on Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(2), 116–124.

Spradley, J. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. Holt, Reinhardt & Winston.

Stake, R. E. (2010). Qualitative research: Studying how things work. Guilford Press.

Thompson, L., Jeffries, M., & Topping, K. (2010). E‐mentoring for e‐learning development. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(3), 305–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2010.498182

Tyran, K. L., & Garcia, J. E. (2015). Reciprocal learning and management education: The

example of using university alumni and other business executives as “virtual” mentors to

business students. Journal of the Academy of Business Education, 16, 54–72.

U.S. Department of Education ED COVID-19 Handbook (2021)

https://www2.ed.gov/documents/coronavirus/reopening-3.pdf

Williams, S., Sunderman, J., & Kim, J. (2012). E-mentoring in an online course: Benefits and challenges to e-mentors. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 10(1), 109–123.

Xu, D., & Jaggars, S. (2013). Adaptability to online learning: Differences across types of students and academic subject areas. Columbia University, Community College Research Center. https://doi.org/10.7916/D82N59NB

Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i4.2440



Copyright (c) 2021 Camey L. Andersen, Richard E. West

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/