Understanding the Roles of Personalization and Social Learning in a Language MOOC Through Learning Analytics

Napat Jitpaisarnwattana, Hayo Reinders, Pornapit Darasawang

Abstract


In the last decade, there has been a great deal of interest in language MOOCs (LMOOCs) and their potential to offer learning opportunities for large audiences, including those in disadvantaged communities. However, experiences and research have shown MOOCs to suffer from several challenges. Chief among these have been low participation and completion rates, which are often attributed to limitations in how opportunities for personalisation and social interaction are implemented. For the current study, a dedicated LMOOC was designed and implemented, called the “Social and Personal Online Language Course (SPOLC).” This language learning environment incorporates a recommendation system and emphasizes personalisation and social interaction. The study identified the types of learning behaviour that were related to course completion and observed how 270 learners in the LMOOC used the various course features. The data were collected using learning analytical methods and analysed using binary logistic regression and feature extraction prediction model. The results demonstrated that working in groups and creating a learning plan were important factors associated with course completion, while interacting with other learners online was not. We conclude with several suggestions and implications for future LMOOC design, implementation, and research.   


Keywords


Language MOOCs, Personalisation, Social Learning, Learning analytics

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Shabandar, R., Hussain, A., Laws, A., Keight, R., Lunn, J., & Radi, N. (2017, May). Machine learning approaches to predict learning outcomes in Massive open online courses. In 2017 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) (pp. 713-720). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN.2017.7965922

Attwell, G. 2007. Personal learning environments—the future of eLearning? eLearning Papers 2(1): 1–8.

Barcena, E., & Martin-Monje, E. (2014). Language MOOCs: An Emerging Field. In E. Martin-Monje & E. Barcena (Eds.), Language MOOCs: Providing learning, transcending boundaries (pp. 1–10). Berlin: De Gruyter Open. https://doi.org/10.2478/9783110420067.1

Bayeck, R. Y. (2016). Exploratory study of MOOC learners’ demographics and motivation: The case of students involved in groups. Open Praxis, 8, 223–233. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.8.3.282

Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Borokhovski, E., Wade, C. A., Tamim, R. M., Surkes, M. A. & Bethel, E. C. (2009). A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1243–1289. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309333844

Blake, C. (2009). Potential of text-based internet chats for improving oral fluency in a second language. The Modern Language Journal, 93(2), 227–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00858.x

Bull, S., & Wasson B. (2016). Competence visualisation: Making sense of data from 21st-century technologies in language learning. ReCALL, 28(2), 147–165. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344015000282

Devedzic, V. (2016). Not fade away? Commentary to paper education and the semantic web. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(1), 378–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-015-0051-2

Downes, S. (2016). Personal and Personalized Learning. EMMA Newsletter, Online, European Multiple MOOCs Aggregator. https://www.downes.ca/cgi-bin/page.cgi?post=65065

Ducate, L., & Lomicka, L. (2008). Adventures in the blogosphere: From blog readers to blog writers. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(1), 9–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220701865474

Godwin-Jones, R. (2009). Personal learning environments. Language Learning & Technology, 13(2), 3–9.

Godwin-Jones, R. (2014). Global reach and local practice: The promise of MOOCS. Language Learning & Technology, 18(3), 5–15.

Godwin-Jones, R. (2017). Scaling up and zooming in: Big data and personalization in language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 21(1), 4–15

Goldwasser, M., Mankoff, C., Manturuk, K., Schmid, L., & Whitfield, K. (2016). Who is a student? Completion in Coursera courses at Duke University. Current Issues in Emerging eLearning, 3, 125–137.

Harrison, R., & Thomas, M. (2009). Identity in online communities: Social networking sites and language learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society, 7(2), 109–124.

Hill, P. (2012). Four Barriers That MOOCs Must Overcome to Build a Sustainable Model. http://mfeldstein.com/four-barriersthat-moocs-must-overcome-to-become-sustainable-model/

Hsu, C.K., Hwang, G.-J., & Chang, C.-K. (2013). A personalized recommendation-based mobile learning approach to improving the reading performance of EFL students. Computers & Education, 63, 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.004

Loizzo, J., Ertmer, P., Watson, W., & Watson, S. (2017). Adults are self-directed and determined to set and achieve personal learning goals in MOOCs: learners’ perceptions of MOOC motivation, success, and completion. Online Learning, 21(2) https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i2.889

Martın-Monje, E., & Barcena, E. (Eds.). (2014). Language MOOCs: Providing learning, transcending boundaries. Berlin: De Gruyter Open. https://doi.org/10.2478/9783110420067

Martın-Monje, E. (2017). Mind the L in LMOOCs: The importance of language learning in massive courses. Paper presented at the DILLE Conference, Venice, Italy. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313368938_Mind_the_L_in_LMOOCs_The_importance_of_language_learning_in_massive_courses

Martin-Monje, E., Castrillo, M. D., & Mañana-Rodigrez, J. (2018) Understanding online interaction in language MOOCs through learning analytics. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(3), 251–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1378237

Moore, M. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923648909526659

Moreira Teixeira, A., & Mota, J. (2014). A proposal for the methodological design of collaborative language MOOCs. In E. Martin-Monje & E. Bárcena (Eds.), Language MOOCs: providing learning, transcending boundaries (pp. 33–47). Berlin: De Gruyter Open. https://doi.org/10.2478/9783110420067.3

Nikiforovs, P., & Bledaite, L. (2012), Personalized sequential language vocabulary learning recommender system. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.o/d901 /b5dcf47db028f1e56b60b931b72d8767cb6a.pdf

Onah, D.F.O., Sinclair, J., & Boyatt. (2014). Dropout rates of massive open online courses: behavioral patterns Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (EDULEARN14): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2402.0009

Pegrum, M. (2014). Mobile learning: Languages, literacies, and cultures. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137309815

Perifanou, M. (2015). Research report on the current state of language learning MOOCs worldwide: exploration, classification and evaluation. LangMOOC project. http://www.langmooc.com/?cat=7

Reinders, H. (2010). Towards a classroom pedagogy for learner autonomy: A framework of independent language learning skills. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(5), 40-55.

Reinders, H. (2014). Personal learning environments for supporting out-of-class language learning. ELT Forum, 52(4), 14-19.

Rubio, F. (2015). The role of interaction in MOOCs and traditional technology-enhanced language courses. In E. Dixon & M. Thomas (Eds.), Researching language learner interactions online: From social media to MOOCs. Computer Assisted Language Instruction Consortium Series, 13 (pp. 63–68). CALICO.

Sallam, H., Martín-Monje, E., & Yan, L. (2020). Research trends in language MOOC studies: a systematic review of the published literature (2012-2018), Computer Assisted Language Learning. 33 1-28. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09588221.2020.1744668

Sanz-Martínez, L., Martínez-Monés, A., BoteLorenzo, M., L., Muñoz-Cristóbal, J. A., y Dimitriadis, Y. (2017). Automatic group formation in a MOOC based on students’ activity criteria. Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, EC-TEL 2017. 179-193. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66610-5_14

Sokolik, M. (2014). What constitutes an effective language MOOC? In E. Martin-Monje & E. Barcena (Eds.), Language MOOCs: Providing learning, transcending boundaries. (pp. 6–32). Berlin: De Gruyter Open. https://doi.org/10.2478/9783110420067.2

Schulze, M., & Scholz, K. (2018). Learning trajectories and the role of online courses in a language program. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(3), 185–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1360362

Wu, W., Yen, L. L., & Marek, M. (2011). Using online EFL interaction to increase confidence, motivation, and ability. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 14(3), 118-129.

Yang, Y. F. (2011). Engaging students in an online situated language learning environment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(2), 181-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2010.538700




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i4.2509



Copyright (c) 2021 Napat Jitpaisarnwattana, Hayo Reinders, Pornapit Darasawang

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/