Moving Assessment Online: Experiences within a School of Pharmacy

Authors

  • Kelsey Morgan Shenandoah University Bernard J. Dunn School of Pharmacy
  • Erin Adams Shenandoah University Bernard J. Dunn School of Pharmacy
  • Teresa Mary Elsobky Shenandoah University Bernard J. Dunn School of Pharmacy
  • Marcia Brackbill Shenandoah University Bernard J. Dunn School of Pharmacy
  • Amber Darr Shenandoah University Bernard J. Dunn School of Pharmacy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i1.2580

Keywords:

Pandemic, pharmacy, assessment, proctoring, simulated examinations, student preference

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic required academic institutions to quickly transition to online learning and make changes to assessment procedures. This study examines how a school of pharmacy creatively approached the challenge of online assessment while maintaining the standards necessary to prepare practice-ready student pharmacists. To conduct traditional exams, instructors deployed two different types of methods utilizing testing software: a video conferencing technology approach which mimicked pre-pandemic, on-campus proctored exams; or open-book, internet access-enabled exams that ensured academic integrity and rigor through various testing strategies. To assess students’ clinical skills, faculty used a combination of techniques such as physical examinations, patient interviews, and patient presentations. To understand the student experience with these assessments, students were surveyed using a 12-item questionnaire. Overall, online video proctoring maintained consistency in exam structure and administration, but required extensive instruction for both students and proctors. Students preferred unproctored, open-book, internet access-enabled, standard time exams versus proctored, closed-book, internet-access disabled, extended time exams. Changes to testing procedures, whether with proctored or unproctored methods, appeared to increase student stress.

Author Biographies

Kelsey Morgan, Shenandoah University Bernard J. Dunn School of Pharmacy

Department of Pharmacy Practice

Assistant Professor rank, Acute Care - Neurology

Erin Adams, Shenandoah University Bernard J. Dunn School of Pharmacy

Department of Pharmacy Practice

Associate Professor rank, Ambulatory Care

Vice Chair of Pharmacy Practice Department

Teresa Mary Elsobky, Shenandoah University Bernard J. Dunn School of Pharmacy

Department of Pharmacy Practice

Associate Professor rank, Psychiatry

Director of Student Affairs

Marcia Brackbill, Shenandoah University Bernard J. Dunn School of Pharmacy

Department of Pharmacy Practice

Professor of Pharmacy rank

Amber Darr, Shenandoah University Bernard J. Dunn School of Pharmacy

Department of Pharmacy Practice

Assistant Professor rank

Director, Continuing Professional Development

References

Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education. (n.d.). Update on Covid-19. Retrieved August 11, 2020, from https://www.acpe-accredit.org/

Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education. (2015). Accreditation Standards and Key Elements for the Professional Program in Pharmacy Leading to the Doctor of Pharmacy Degree. https://www.acpe-accredit.org/pdf/Standards2016FINAL.pdf.

Carter, L. (2020). NAPLEX MPJE 2020 Candidate Application Bulletin. National Association of Boards of Pharmacy.

Engle, J. P. (2020). Assuring Quality in Pharmacy Education During a Time of Crisis. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 84(6), 646–650. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe8135

ExamSoft Worldwide, Inc. (n.d.).

Jan Engle. (2020, March 17). Guidance from ACPE [Personal communication].

Ray, M. E., Daugherty, K. K., Lebovitz, L., Rudolph, M. J., Shuford, V. P., & DiVall, M. V. (2018). Best Practices on Examination Construction, Administration, and Feedback. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 82(10), 1127–1132. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7066

Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (2020).

Downloads

Published

2021-03-01

Issue

Section

Section II: Brief Case Studies on the Pivot to Emergency Remote Teaching