Community of Inquiry Framework: Research Trends Between 2000-2020

Authors

  • Yusuf Ziya Olpak

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v26i2.2737

Keywords:

community of inquiry, social presence, cognitive presence, teaching presence, bibliometric mapping analysis, systematic review

Abstract

The current study aimed to understand the trend in the community of inquiry that many researchers have been working on for over 20 years. Within the scope of this aim, 102 studies were reviewed with regards to some variables: most preferred keywords and words in abstract, year of publication, authors, journals, geographical distribution, academic disciplines, research methods, course delivery methods, participant type, and references. The findings demonstrate that the articles reviewed were from 216 authors in 20 countries. Most of the studies were from the Social Sciences field, and the continent with the most studies was North America. Quantitative research methods were mostly preferred in the studies, and the study group of a great of majority the studies were higher education students. Finally, various recommendations were made for future research after determining gaps that exist in the current literature.

References

Akçayır, M., & Akçayır, G. (2017). Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Research Review, 20, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.11.002

Akçayır, G., & Akçayır, M. (2018). The flipped classroom: A review of its advantages and challenges. Computers & Education, 126, 334–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.021

Akyol, Z., Garrison, D. R., & Ozden, M. Y. (2009). Online and blended communities of inquiry: Exploring the developmental and perceptional differences. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(6), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i6.765

Ammon, U. (Ed.). (2011). The dominance of English as a language of science: Effects on other languages and language communities (Vol. 84). Mouton de Gruyter.

Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v5i2.1875

Annand, D. (2011). Social presence within the community of inquiry framework. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(5), 40–56. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i5.924

Arbaugh, J. B., Bangert, A., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2010). Subject matter effects and the community of inquiry (CoI) framework: An exploratory study. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.006

Arbaugh, J. B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S. R., Garrison, D. R., Ice, P., Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. P. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the community of inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3), 133–136.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.003

Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

Babić, D., Kutlača, Đ., Živković, L., Štrbac, D., & Semenčenko, D. (2016). Evaluation of the quality of scientific performance of the selected countries of Southeast Europe. Scientometrics, 106(1), 405–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1649-8

Boston, W., Diaz, S. R., Gibson, A. M., Ice, P., Richardson, J., & Swan, K. (2009). An exploration of the relationship between indicators of the community of inquiry framework and retention in online programs. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13(3), 67–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v13i3.1657

Bozkurt, A., Akgun-Ozbek, E., Yilmazel, S., Erdogdu, E., Ucar, H., Guler, E., … Aydin, C. H. (2015). Trends in distance education research: A content analysis of journals 2009-2013. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 16(1), 330–363. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i1.1953

Carlon, S., Bennett-Woods, D., Berg, B., Claywell, L., LeDuc, K., Marcisz, N., … Zenoni, L. (2012). The community of inquiry instrument: Validation and results in online health care disciplines. Computers & Education, 59(2), 215–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.01.004

Caskurlu, S. (2018). Confirming the subdimensions of teaching, social, and cognitive presences: A construct validity study. The Internet and Higher Education, 39, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.05.002

Castellanos-Reyes, D. (2020). 20 years of the community of inquiry framework. TechTrends, 64, 557–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00491-7

Choy, J. L. F., & Quek, C. L. (2016). Modelling relationships between students’ academic achievement and community of inquiry in an online learning environment for a blended course. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 32(4), 106–124. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2500

Cohen, A., & Holstein, S. (2018). Analysing successful massive open online courses using the community of inquiry model as perceived by students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(5), 544–556. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12259

CoI (2020). The Community of inquiry framework theory, methodology and instruments. https://coi.athabascau.ca/

Cooper, V. A., Forino, G., Kanjanabootra, S., & von Meding, J. (2020). Leveraging the community of inquiry framework to support web-based simulations in disaster studies. The Internet and Higher Education, 47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100757

Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2018). The use of mobile learning in higher

education: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 123, 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.007

Fiock, H. (2020). Designing a community of inquiry in online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(1), 135–153. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i5.3985

Garrison, D. R. (2006). Online collaboration principles. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 10(1), 25–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v10i1.1768

Garrison, D. R. (2009). Communities of inquiry in online learning. In P. Rogers (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Distance Learning (2nd ed., pp. 352–360). IGI Global.

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2010). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.003

Garrison, D. R., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.04.001

Gaudino, M., Morsi, M., Hameed, I., Naik, A., Robinson, N. B., Benedetto, U., & Ruel, M. (2020). Publication of cardiac surgery research papers in top cardiovascular journals. Journal of Cardiac Surgery, 35(10), 2734–2736. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocs.14894

González-Alcaide, G., Valderrama-Zurián, J. C., & Aleixandre-Benavent, R. (2012). The impact factor in non-English-speaking countries. Scientometrics, 92(2), 297–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0692-y

Gunawardena, C. N., & Zittle, F. J. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment. American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 8–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649709526970

Hamel, R. E. (2007). The dominance of English in the international scientific periodical literature and the future of language use in science. AILA Review, 20(1), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.20.06ham

Harrell, K. B., & Wendt, J. L. (2019). The impact of blended learning on community of inquiry and perceived learning among high school learners enrolled in a Public Charter School. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 51(3), 259–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2019.1590167

Heersmink, R., van den Hoven, J., van Eck, N. J., & van den Berg, J. (2011). Bibliometric mapping of computer and information ethics. Ethics and Information Technology, 13(3), 241–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-011-9273-7

Heilporn, G., & Lakhal, S. (2020). Investigating the reliability and validity of the community of inquiry framework: An analysis of categories within each presence. Computers & Education, 145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103712

Hilliard, L. P., & Stewart, M. K. (2019). Time well spent: Creating a community of inquiry in blended first-year writing courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 41, 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.11.002

Hung, J. L., & Zhang, K. (2012). Examining mobile learning trends 2003–2008: A categorical meta-trend analysis using text mining techniques. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 24, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-011-9044-9

Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014

Ke, F. (2010). Examining online teaching, cognitive, and social presence for adult students. Computers & Education, 55(2), 808–820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.03.013

Kim, G. C., & Gurvitch, R. (2020). Online education research adopting the community of inquiry framework: A systematic review. Quest, 72(4), 395–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2020.1761843

Kim, J., Kwon, Y., & Cho, D. (2011). Investigating factors that influence social presence and learning outcomes in distance higher education. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1512–1520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.005

Kovanović, V., Joksimović, S., Poquet, O., Hennis, T., de Vries, P., Hatala, M., … Gašević, D. (2019). Examining communities of inquiry in massive open online courses: The role of study strategies. The Internet and Higher Education, 40, 20–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.09.001

Kozan, K., & Caskurlu, S. (2018). On the Nth presence for the community of inquiry framework. Computers & Education, 122, 104–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.010

Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., … Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(10), e1–e34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006

Lowenthal, P. R., & Dunlap, J. C. (2010). From pixel on a screen to real person in your students’ lives: Establishing social presence using digital storytelling. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1), 70–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.004

OECD. (2007). Working Party of National Experts on Science and Technology Indicators. Revised field of science and technology (FoS) classification in the Frascati manual. https://unstats.un.org/unsd/EconStatKB/KnowledgebaseArticle10269.aspx.

Olpak, Y. Z., & Kılıç Çakmak, E. (2018). Examining the reliability and validity of a Turkish version of the community of inquiry survey. Online Learning, 22(1), 147–161. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.990

Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: A best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70(1), 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803

Stenbom, S. (2018). A systematic review of the community of inquiry survey. The Internet and Higher Education, 39, 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.06.001

Tan, H. R., Chng, W. H., Chonardo, C., Ng, M. T. T., & Fung, F. M. (2020). How chemists achieve active learning online during the COVID-19 pandemic: Using the community of inquiry (CoI) framework to support remote teaching. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 2512–2518. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00541

Tsai, C.-W., & Chiang, Y.-C. (2013). Research trends in problem-based learning (PBL) research in e-learning and online education environments: A review of publications in SSCI-indexed journals from 2004 to 2012. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(6), E185–E190. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12038

Watts, J. (2017). Beyond flexibility and convenience: Using the community of inquiry framework to assess the value of online graduate education in technical and professional communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 31(4), 481–519. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651917713251

Wicks, D. A., Craft, B. B., Mason, G. N., Gritter, K., & Bolding, K. (2015). An investigation into the community of inquiry of blended classrooms by a Faculty Learning Community. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.12.001

Zhang, R. (2020). Exploring blended learning experiences through the community of inquiry framework. Language Learning & Technology, 24(1), 38–53.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-01

Issue

Section

Review of Literature